Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Swarovski vs. Zeiss, HELP

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2013, 10:49 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Swarovski vs. Zeiss, HELP

Looking to buy a new scope for a 300 WM and appreciate your comments.

Have been looking at the Swarovski Z5 3.5-18 x44 BT 4W and the Zeiss Conquest HD5 3-15 x 42 plex with a Kenton top nob.

About a $ 500.00 price difference between them and wanted to hear your comments on them scopes. Is the swarovski that much better ???

Thanks, Wille
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2013, 03:01 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 102
Re: Swarovski vs. Zeiss, HELP

I'v had that Z5 for a while now and had a good look at the Zeiss hd 5 recently. The better points of the Z5 for my liking are the 4w reticle, a little more mag, I have a personal preference for the swaro glass and they make a nice allloy flip up for the objective. On the HD 5 side its cheaper, has an extra 5 moa with its zero stop single turn over the Z5 and the turrets seemed a little more positive. If the internals of the zeiss are reliable Id be happy with either and still might pick up the hd5 for a little BSA .222 I have.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2013, 03:18 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Greencastle, PA
Posts: 275
Re: Swarovski vs. Zeiss, HELP

I have both and I think the Z5 is worth the extra money. The glass is super great. My HD5 is decent but not great.

As mentioned above the 4W reticle is the perfect thickness and windage holds are great. The only drawback to the z5 for me is the limited travel but with that said I can still get out to 700 yards with a 200 yard zero at 5000 feet. You can also use the bottom of the reticle which is 10.25 moa and add the 13.25 moa in the dial for a total of 23.5 which should get you close to 1000. The zeiss has 16.5 moa with the zero stop and the swaro has 13.25 moa. I put an MOA turret from the Outdoorsmans on my Z5 and I love it. The HD5 clicks do feel more positive but the swaro has been dead on out to 700 yards and back to 200 on many occasions so I completely trust it will dial properly.

If you are buying for your primary rifle I think the extra money will be well spent and you will enjoy the benefits of the glass every time you use it. I will not be buying another HD5 after owning the Z5.

I put my HD5 on my varmint/backup hunting rifle and it is fine for that purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-22-2013, 08:58 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,893
Re: Swarovski vs. Zeiss, HELP

Do I think the Swaro is a "better" scope?.....Yes! Do I think its worth the extra $$ over the Zeiss?.....NO WAY.

Any "better" feature the Swaro has...you're never going to see in any hunting situation
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-22-2013, 10:27 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 246
Re: Swarovski vs. Zeiss, HELP

I love these debates...but when you ask "is something worth the extra money?" that makes it such a relative topic. What's the cost of have a few more minutes of light to be able to take a shot as it's getting dark? Is that worth it? You tell us, is that worth the extra $$$ to you? The Swarovski is a better scope when comparing the two, but they weren't made to compete against each other. These are two different scopes made to appeal to their price point consumers. I personally always buy the best glass I can afford...I don't want to be holding off on a last minute shot at a trophy because I didn't want to spend the extra money for a better optical instrument. So to me, yes it's worth it to have those few extra features and to have better glass. Only you can answer for yourself if that's worth it.

Mac
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-23-2013, 01:46 AM
Official LRH Sponsor
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 794
I like both scopes, but they are not in the same class. The HD5 is a good 5:1 zoom ratio scope, but only offers a doublet objective lens. The resolution, especially at large elevation settings (greater than +/-25 MOA), suffers a bit from blur. It's not a big problem, but it's noticeable when compared against a good spotting scope. Even still, the contrast is good and it's a big step up from scopes that cost $500-700. The reticle choices are limited, however.

The Swaro Z5 uses a triplet objective lens. This lens design is apochromatic and provides a sharper image, especially at large elevation settings. The stray light is very low - the contrast stays high even when looking into shadows while facing a setting or rising sun. The Z5 scopes use the Z6 erector optics and coil spring design.

I use the 3.5-18x44 with the BRH reticle. The resolution is so good that I don't bother taking a spotting scope with me when hunting deer. I use my binos on a tripod for spotting and the Z5 for judging details like antler points.

Coincidentally, HighPowerOptics has a display sample of the Z5 3.5-18x44 BT 4W on sale. It's in like new condition. That narrows the price gap a bit. See the post further down on subforum for more information.
__________________

www.HighPowerOptics.com
Sports Optics
Rifle Scope Installation Tool Kits for Rent
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-23-2013, 09:55 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway, Buskerud
Posts: 333
Re: Swarovski vs. Zeiss, HELP

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackgee View Post
I love these debates...but when you ask "is something worth the extra money?" that makes it such a relative topic. What's the cost of have a few more minutes of light to be able to take a shot as it's getting dark? Is that worth it? You tell us, is that worth the extra $$$ to you? The Swarovski is a better scope when comparing the two, but they weren't made to compete against each other. These are two different scopes made to appeal to their price point consumers. I personally always buy the best glass I can afford...I don't want to be holding off on a last minute shot at a trophy because I didn't want to spend the extra money for a better optical instrument. So to me, yes it's worth it to have those few extra features and to have better glass. Only you can answer for yourself if that's worth it.

Mac
+! A 100 % correct. To compare both scopes is like comparing apples and pears. The Conquest has a 1- inch tube, the Z5 30mm, so it's no wonder that the light - transmission in the Swarovski is much better. The Z5 is in the luxury class due to price and design features, while the Conquest is an especially fabricated (decent) scope and reasonably prized for the US market. In catalogues for European countries, the Conquest is just missing! If there would be a fair comparison then between the Z5 and f. ex. the Zeiss Diavari Classic. The “low budget line“ for Zeiss in Europe is the so called Duralyt. The thread starter should take a deep look into the scope market because there many other top scopes to find like Steiner (Nightvision), Leica Magnus, the brand new S & B, Docter Optics, Meopta’s top line, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.31%
74 Votes
NO - 51.09%
117 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.59%
38 Votes
Total Votes: 229
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC