Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 12-17-2011, 09:40 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,900
Re: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

Hey Augustus, another instance for proof. Remember last summer when I came to your LR shoot? At station one one of the guys was missing that target by the gate over toward the little bluff. His Swaro was telling him it was 60 yards farther than it was so he was shooting over the top of it. I handed him my PLRF10 and he got the correct range and was then on the steel. The Swaro's huge beam was grabbing the little rock bluff beyond tha target and there was no way it could get an actual range on the steel. Perfect example at 1100 or so yards that resulted in a miss. Not the rifles, not the shooter or his program, simply bad data produced by the beam that is over 6 ft. at that distance.

Jeff
__________________

Last edited by Broz; 12-19-2011 at 06:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-17-2011, 11:33 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 420
Re: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

Broz, AugustIs is the man you were addressing in the last post. I am AugustUs. Confusing aint it. Anyway your point is spot on.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-17-2011, 11:38 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,900
Re: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by Augustus View Post
Broz, AugustIs is the man you were addressing in the last post. I am AugustUs. Confusing aint it. Anyway your point is spot on.
oops, my appologies, I will now know. Where are you from? Just for future reference.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-17-2011, 11:14 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 420
Re: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

Oklahoma.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-18-2011, 01:28 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,900
Re: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by Augustus View Post
Oklahoma.
Cool, Thanks, now I will keep you two straight.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-19-2011, 05:00 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Star, ID
Posts: 276
Re: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

Thanks so much for the responses. I reviewed the other posts, that you referred to. Very imformative. I must add though that a $7000 min purch price for the Vectronix will not happen, purely for economic reasons. Maybe someday. The fact is right now I doubt I need that as my immediate goal will be 800 yards on deer/elk, up from my current 600-650. I have run to the end of my Nikon 1200's abiliities, especially this year on my elk that was feeding in a burn. Rangefinder did not like that black surface even at 500 yards.

Anyway, I have been paying more attention to the Beam Divergence numbers. I get that they are quoted at Vertical(mrad) x Horiz(mrad). So that a 1.0 x 1.0 beam would be 3.6" high x 3.6" wide at 100 yards, and 36"x36" at 1000.

So, if I look at the Swaro, with a beam of 2.0x2.0, it would basically be a 6' square(72"x72") at 1000 yards. The Leica 1600 at .5x2.5, would be 18" tall x 90" wide at the same 1000 yards.

The interesting thing is that I routinely see reports of the Swaro having more reliable readings , especially in all kinds of conditions out to around 1000-1200 yards. Yes I also read that have longer max readings. I'm not really concerned with max yardage, but with consistency. I can see how you might assume a much shorter and only slightly wider beam may be more reliable, but is there any other factors such as optical clarity, laser quality/strength, etc. that may affect this. For example, the exit pupil of a bino has a direct affect on the low light viewing, but I know my 15x56 swaros can show me a deer at twilight as good or better than most 8x50 B brand bino's due to the glass and coatings.

Will the unit usually return the single largest item in the given field of view? For example at 1000 yards, a 6' beam is going to have a lot of elk in it if held steady. Not so much on a deer or wolf(i'm from Idaho).

So I ask, based on the high number of reports that the Swaro's are the best LRF under the price of the Victoronix, is there anything other than the size and dimension of the beam divergence that will regularly affect it's ability to get consistent readings, especially in that 800-1200 yard range?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-19-2011, 06:01 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,900
Re: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkondeff View Post
So I ask, based on the high number of reports that the Swaro's are the best LRF under the price of the Victoronix, is there anything other than the size and dimension of the beam divergence that will regularly affect it's ability to get consistent readings, especially in that 800-1200 yard range?
First, let me say I am a Swaro fan. I have a pair of their bino's I use daily. Plus I invested in a ATS 80 HD spotter with 20x60 eye pc. I think I have owned a total of 5 of the Swaro 8x30 laserguides. I had to return a few for repair. Some units had a glich that would cause the unit to freeze up. Then the battery had to be removed and replaced to get it going again. As you could imagine this would not be good if you wre ready to take a trophy.

The other things that I didn't like about the swaro's were.

Huge reticle circle. Hard to pinpoint a deer at 1000 as it it to large,

Also the reticle is hard to see at times. It is orange and if your eye relief is not perfect it can mysteriously disappear until you reposition.

Sloooow, when you push the button the reticle does this circlle , circle, circle thing and then it gives a reading.

I am not saying this is a terrible unit, it is just not "ALL" that you read after you use it in the field for a while.

The big problem with the taller reticle is like this. OK , think of a flashlight on the wall. Back up and it gets bigger...... Beam divergence. Now lay that flashlight level on a flat surface............. The larger the beam the more surface it picks up. My 200" WT deer in a cornfield was impossible to range. I kept getting corn stocks or the trees behind. This was at 875 to 950 yards or so. I didn't take the shot because I could never get a repeated distance and soon it was to dark. I will never forget this.

I also want to add. The Leica 1200 CRF's were very good and owning 3 or 4 of them I have not had a problem. They are fast. Have a small squae red reticle and if steadied on bags will range deer at 900 to 1000 in mid day and well past 1200 in morning or evening light. The 1200 CRF I kept for back up just ranged a dead elk on snow at 1341 the other night. Then I took out my Vectronix PLRF10 and confirmed that was corect. (while waiting for a wolf to show up)

As some have reported the Leica 1600 CRF's have had some issues. Simply some don't range as far as they should. So if you can buy from a reputable dealer that will replae if not happy. Or better yet take out side and try before you buy. The 1600's I have tested have ranged deer and elk at 1000 ~ 1200 easy on the flats. Pine trees at 1700 in the evening.

No matter what you get, remember the smaller beam units due to the precise beam need to be held steady. Would you shoot a deer at 800 yds plus off hand or across your knee? Take the RF and place it on a sand bag and hold it solid. I sometimes place a bag on top the scope while prone and steady the RF on that. Works good.

The larger beam units like the Swaro will definatly return reading easier. This is where the users get fooled. You take it out and it reads everything to 1400 or 1500 yards and I have ranged rock bluffs in the evening at 1999 yds. I believe it on the bluff, but if it is on a flat surface or rolling foothills, I have doubts. I have caught it lying to me many times.

The Vectronis units start at around $1900. That is the new Terripin.

Vectronics Terripin very Goodacious

The Vectronix I have is the PLRF10 and they sell now for about $3700.


If you want to accuratly range deer sized game to 800 or 1000 yds. I would grab a Leica 1200 CRF-Y for about $550, or a used one for $450 and be happy. If you have the budget and want a little better unit get a Leica 1600 CRF.


WheeeeW!!! Sorry for the long post, but I have done my homework as I was on a mission to know what really works after my Swaro cost me that WT Buck. PS, two days later I took a doe to fill my tag. She was on a hillside at 1137 yards and the Swaro worked fine that time.

Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Swaro Rangefinder Feedback
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swaro rangefinder warrenty/repair ??? bigbuck General Discussion 11 08-20-2010 11:43 PM
My new Swaro rangefinder is on the way!!! JARHEAD1371 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 10 08-19-2010 08:03 PM
Swaro rangefinder hard to read Varmint Hunter Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 1 10-27-2007 06:40 AM
Newer Swaro rangefinder vs. older Swaro rangefinder goodgrouper Equipment Discussions 10 08-02-2006 11:09 AM
Bushnell vs swaro rangefinder screech General Discussion 1 07-21-2006 07:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC