Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Swaro -- EL vs SLC

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:30 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5
Swaro -- EL vs SLC

Can someone explain to me why you would pay the extra $400-$500 for the Swarovoki EL 10x42 compared to the 10x42 SLC???? Is there a difference in the optics or is it just the weight difference. There is only 3oz difference btw the EL (27oz) and SLC (30oz). I just don't see the justification for the EL price. Or should I just go up to the 10x50SLC?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2009, 05:45 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Potomac River
Posts: 5,060
Re: Swaro -- EL vs SLC

If you run "search" using my name you will find I asked this question about 3 years ago. Some of the very best people responded. Good advice is hard to come by. You will have to make your own decision by the answers by the people were very good.
__________________
The Smokin Fur Rifle Club
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2009, 06:45 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5
Re: Swaro -- EL vs SLC

Thank Buffalobob......i found the thread.....excellent info. Now I've just got to bite the bullet and go buy some!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2009, 12:05 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,520
Re: Swaro -- EL vs SLC

Not everybody will see the same results so take what I say with a grain of salt.

I own a pair of El's. I have used SLC's extensivly. I also have access to several SCL models. My eyes can tell the difference with minimal comparison. The EL's are noticably brighter to me. Whether or not there is any resolution differences or not, I am not sure. But they are much brighter objective for objective. It doesnt hurt that they are much lighter either.

Are they worth the extra coin? Only you can answer that. If $$ isnt an issue, then my opinion is they are worth it. If it is the difference between making your mortgage or not, then maybe and maybe not.
__________________
Long range shooting is a process that ends with a result. Once you start to focus on the result (where the shot goes, how big the group is, what your buck will score, what your match score is, what place you are in...) then you loose the capacity to focus on the process.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2009, 01:55 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Potomac River
Posts: 5,060
Re: Swaro -- EL vs SLC

I will give you an example of how good the SLCs are. At 2300-2500 yards I found a lone cow elk in a clearcut that was dotted with tree stumps by the color difference alone. In a handheld mode using a shooting stick to steady them I could not verify that the thing I was seeing had legs and was actaully an elk but the color was certainly elk color and nto the color of the stumps. It was striking enough to get me to run for the spotting scope. With a spotting scope and the Night force rifle scope I was able to verify that it was indeed an elk and had no antlers.

In other words the color transmission is extraordinarily good. Resolution of fine detail at those ranges with it not on a tripod is problematic. I am sure Michael is correct that the ELs are better but as he says how good do you need and how good can you afford.
__________________
The Smokin Fur Rifle Club
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2009, 02:11 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,520
Re: Swaro -- EL vs SLC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffalobob View Post
I will give you an example of how good the SLCs are. At 2300-2500 yards I found a lone cow elk in a clearcut that was dotted with tree stumps by the color difference alone. In a handheld mode using a shooting stick to steady them I could not verify that the thing I was seeing had legs and was actaully an elk but the color was certainly elk color and nto the color of the stumps. It was striking enough to get me to run for the spotting scope. With a spotting scope and the Night force rifle scope I was able to verify that it was indeed an elk and had no antlers.

In other words the color transmission is extraordinarily good. Resolution of fine detail at those ranges with it not on a tripod is problematic. I am sure Michael is correct that the ELs are better but as he says how good do you need and how good can you afford.

Youre right on BB, I sure was not trying to down play the SLC's, they are truly some of the finest binos in the world. The EL's may be a bit brighter and lighter in weight but there is nothing wrong with the SLC's and nobody needs to feel second rate for owning or using them.
__________________
Long range shooting is a process that ends with a result. Once you start to focus on the result (where the shot goes, how big the group is, what your buck will score, what your match score is, what place you are in...) then you loose the capacity to focus on the process.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Swaro -- EL vs SLC
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTT Swaro ogallala_1 Optics For Sale 4 01-29-2010 12:49 AM
Swaro Laserguide chain Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 8 12-27-2009 09:34 AM
Zeiss or Swaro??? Bravo 4 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 1 11-05-2009 05:33 PM
Swaro Fliers daj Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 11 12-13-2006 08:45 AM
Newer Swaro rangefinder vs. older Swaro rangefinder goodgrouper Equipment Discussions 10 08-02-2006 11:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC