Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

schmidt&bender A8 reticle help

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2013, 09:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
schmidt&bender A8 reticle help

I have an older S&B 2.5-10 x 50 with an A8 reticle on a weatherby 270mag and I never really used it for range estimation but now I would like to learn how and what power I should use for ranging.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2013, 08:45 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,172
Re: schmidt&bender A8 reticle help

Yessir--looks like that's a plex-style reticle which is what i used for an example in this video of how to rangefind with any multi-stadia reticle system you may be using--

Reticle-Rangefinding Math Youtube
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2013, 03:22 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Re: schmidt&bender A8 reticle help

thanks for the reply. this is a FFP 2.5-10x56 that ive had for 20 years and I still like the clear glass and although I own 4 nightforce and they have the 2R which is a lot easier to use.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2013, 11:43 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,172
Re: schmidt&bender A8 reticle help

No problem using a plex reticle for rangefinding. In fact if the subtension is smaller than the milliradian, it will probably also be more accurately applied. Just remember to use it just like a 2-unit "mil-dot", i.e. 2 plex post tip to x-hair units. It'll be a bit more accurately applied this way than using it like a 1-unit mil-dot from plex post tip to plex post tip.

Don't expect "stadiametric rangefinding" to be accurately applied on game animals that vary in size a lot though--deer, elk, etc. Just today whilst hunting coyotes i had the opportunity to reticle-range a doe antelope at a guessed 14" back to brisket using the Burris Ballistic Plex reticle. I guessed .8 of the 1st to 2nd lines down (3.0 inch per hundred yds.) from the sitting position--not seaddy enough really for the most accurate "mil-reading". It lasered at 625 yds. Here's the equation--

14 x100 / 3.0 / .8 = 583 yds.--NOT CLOSE ENOUGH!

I have found stadiametric rangefinding accurate on most game spp to ~500 yds. max. Stadiametric Rangefinding is the best application of the SWAG acronym i've ever seen really.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2013, 12:04 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Re: schmidt&bender A8 reticle help

thanks for the info and reply .your post reminds me that I have MUCH more to learn about using my standard scopes for ranging. some or the terms you used I have never heard before and gives me a lot of new useful info to study and try to put to use
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2013, 06:24 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,172
Re: schmidt&bender A8 reticle help

Good lucka nd have fun with it--although it's not a perfect system, it's certainly better than guessing. I have already had feedback from 2 different guys who used it to range coyotes between 400-500 yds. and it worked for them. FYI, there are 2 important aspects to remember about reticle [and turret] applications, and that is--

1) Reticle subtension is ~inversely proportional to magnification [in 2FP optics], and

2) The mil-dot mil-ranging formula actually defines the math behind any multi-stadia reticle and turret rangefinding and downrange zeroing applications.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Have You Ever Backpack Hunted?
YES - 62.26%
1,046 Vote
NO - 37.74%
634 Votes
Total Votes: 1,680
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC