Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Rings & Mounts

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-08-2005, 04:25 PM
Bronze Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 69
Rings & Mounts

Although I am stile determining rifle and scope. I am strongly leaning toward a Rem 700 VS and a 16X Super Sniper Scope to do some target out to 500 yds. Can you all recommend some rings and bases that will kepp er' shootin straight. Thanks,
Ramses II
(sorry if this post is in the wrong section)
Reply With Quote

Unread 02-08-2005, 07:30 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sask. Canada
Posts: 2,410
Re: Rings & Mounts

We have a lot of info in the archives on scope mounts. Bottom line there are two basic designs, originally developed a long time ago by Weaver and Redfield. Both work fine. The Weaver design is more robust, it is used as the basis for tactical style mounts from Badger, GGG, Leupold MK4 and lots of others. Weaver style rings clamp to the base, crossbolt fits into a slot in the base, usually a 1/2 inch nut to tighten on side of ring or a handle in the case of Warne Maximas.

The Redfield design is more hunting/consumer grade and it is currently sold by Leupold, Millet, Burris and a few others. Redfield uses a combination of dovetail and opposed bolts. Dovetail is a weak link, turning it in place is a metal to metal fit despite lube, metal is usually displaced. Not much metal left at smallest portion of dovetail, it can bend if hit hard.

Most reasonable cost-wise would be the Warne Maxima Weaver style on a sloped Ken Farrel base or the excellent Burris Redfield style rings with a poly insert (offsettable) on a sloped Leupold base. Burris rings with inserts allow additional elevation alignment of the scope, plus Redfield design allows windage alignment by tightening-loosening opposed bolts. This adjustment is not possible with Weaver design tacticals or Warnes. You hope that the holes in the top of your receiver are close to lined up with the center of your bore.
Most expensive and strongest method is the true tacticals with Picatinny bases - looking at $250-300 or more for a setup.
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-09-2005, 03:43 AM
Gold Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 528
Re: Rings & Mounts

I like a P rail. Make mine Badger!! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

I have a Rem. VS like you with a Badger 20 moa cant, and Badger rings.
Friend, go with Badger!! It just don't get any better..sakofan....
It's only rock and roll....But I like it!
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-09-2005, 08:43 AM
Bronze Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 69
Re: Rings & Mounts

I will go with a picatinny mount. I know they ain't cheap [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] But they are the strongest. So, Which is better, a one piece mount or a two piece mount?

Ramses II
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: Rings & Mounts
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Picatinny Mounts and Rings Backcountrypro Long Range Hunting & Shooting 4 06-15-2008 11:11 AM
scope mounts and rings USMC M38A1 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 5 04-15-2008 10:08 PM
Leupold Rings & Mounts for M-70 su35 Guns For Sale 0 08-09-2005 01:21 PM
IOR rings/mounts??? sakofan Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 2 11-24-2003 07:39 PM
Mounts and Rings (Weatherby TRR) slocounty The Basics, Starting Out 3 03-17-2003 03:40 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC