close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics

Reply

optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 05-10-2007, 02:47 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 97
optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

Which has the better optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Buckmaster maybe Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupold VX II?

Hello everyone, I followed a recomendation here and looked at the Mueller 8.5-25×50AO WOW! The pricing is great, they say full-multicoated, etc, etc... of course there are scopes at Harbour Freigh that say that also. Anyway, anybody use these?



Thanks - Rod
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 05-10-2007, 03:21 PM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2005
    Location: Arkansas / Oklahoma / Boarder
    Posts: 690
    Re: optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

    You need Zeiss on they list .
    They are the Best .
    Redbone
    __________________
    7 MM STW

    Kill more Coyotes

    Feed The Buzzards
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 05-10-2007, 05:38 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: May 2001
    Location: Casper Wy
    Posts: 1,379
    Re: optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

    Mueller is one of them for the $$ scopes.I had a 4-14 that was better than a Simmons but not as good as a Leupold VXll and a VXll is below my expectations of a scope.
    Nikon Monarchs are good scopes and all I have looked through where in the VXlll class or better!!They say bushnell makes a good scope these days but I just cant get past the scopes of old and the elivation adjustment is almost always lacking.
    __________________
    "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." -Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 05-11-2007, 03:20 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2005
    Location: Back in the south -NW FL..
    Posts: 1,160
    Re: optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

    Nikon monarch and leupold vxII are not in the same league as the others.
    I have a 3x9-50 leupold vxII that is a very bright scope better than a 5.5x16.5-44 nikon monarch.And i'd say the resolution is equal.

    I also have a swift premier 4.5x14-44 that i really like a lot.Very pleasant to use -your eye lines up in the scope easily no searching for a sight picture.
    I hear mueller is better than swift but -no- hands on expierence.
    For a low to midrange scope the nikon buckmaster w/ side focus is hard to beat , I have a 6x18 on a 22-250 and like it a lot.-Mike
    __________________
    AIPAC for president !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 05-13-2007, 08:58 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Posts: 5
    Re: optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

    I have a Nikon Monarch a Burris Signature Select and a VXIII that are almost identical in optical quality. Too bad the VXIII is about $200 more than the other two.
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 05-14-2007, 12:29 PM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Sep 2005
    Location: Oracle, Az
    Posts: 73
    Re: optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

    [ QUOTE ]
    Nikon monarch and leupold vxII are not in the same league as the others.
    I have a 3x9-50 leupold vxII that is a very bright scope better than a 5.5x16.5-44 nikon monarch.And i'd say the resolution is equal.

    Your not comparing the same optical specifications thus your perception of brightness is invalid. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
    __________________
    NRA Life
    Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society
    Arizona Antelope Foundation
    Arizona Wildlife Foundation
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 05-19-2007, 10:17 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2005
    Location: Back in the south -NW FL..
    Posts: 1,160
    Re: optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol

    You're right Ahab -but just a general concesus on scopes i have.
    Like 8x against 8x ? which is better.
    __________________
    AIPAC for president !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: optical quality Bushnell 3200, Nikon Monarch, Burris Fullfield, Leupol
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    WTS Nikon Buckmark & Burris LRS Fullfield II Electro-Dot military Optics For Sale 1 07-22-2011 12:46 PM
    WTB bushnell 3200 or burris ff2 foreign Optics For Sale 1 03-30-2011 06:54 PM
    Elite 3200 or Burris Fullfield II? deermaster Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 5 02-09-2011 07:36 PM
    Burris fullfield II good quality? meatyrem Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 10 01-17-2011 08:42 PM
    bushnell 3200 vs. nikon buckmaster reed Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 9 08-26-2008 07:23 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC