Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2006, 02:49 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SW MO
Posts: 1,174
Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

I am looking to get a scope with some sort of hash marks on the reticle for shooting out to 500-600 yards. I have decided that I would rather not dial in the yardage, as I don't plan to shoot over 600 yards. I would rather hold over using reference points. Primary use would be for my 338 RUM and my 7STW for elk and deer. I have a rangefinder, and I plan to verify my trajectory by shooting.
I have narrowed my search down based on what I can afford to the Nikon Buckmasters 4.5-14 side focus mildot and the Burris 4.5-14 Ballistic Plex AO. While the Ballistic Plex isn't as precise as mils, the stadia wires subtend less of the field of view than mildots. Does it really matter which one I use since I won't be shooting extreme range anyway?
Both seem to be bright and eye relief is adequate on both. Let me know what you guys think.
__________________
Lefties are the only ones in their right minds!
(and I ain't talkin' politics!)

NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-19-2006, 08:24 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,856
Re: Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

I would choose the Burris fro the balistic plex because thats what it was desgined from. the Mil-Dot system is just that a system for measuring objects to estimate range. Yes they can be used as hlod over points but I woulden't trust them past about 400yds and with a STW that makes it kinda pointles.
The Burris system was desgined as a set of hold over points and I assume that they will be alot closer to an even set of yardage marks than mils would be
__________________
Si Vis Pacem Parabellum
Molon Labe
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-19-2006, 09:18 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 304
Re: Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

I'm a fan of the Burris line--I've never had problems with them, and I really do like the ballistic mil-dot and ballistic plex reticles...I had a black diamond 4-16 ballistic mil-dot on my .308 warbird that worked great out to 600yds, and the 3-9 fullfield II that's on my 300RUM works great to 500yds. I sight in for roughly 300yds, and the first hash mark down is for 400, 2nd for 500...and that's all I've stretched it out to. Admittedly, I will be looking to upgrade my optics as I upgrade my gun, but that won't be for a while, especially since my LSS 300RUM shoots great as a sporter, and the 3-9 scope works well for my applications (50yds-500yds). Best of luck with the decision!
__________________
God Bless and Shoot Straight
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:03 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 260
Re: Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

For the money it's darn hard to beat the Burris. I like mine alot. There are computer programs that will help you "forecast" your hitting points with different ammo because the moa of the crossmarks is published. This is only a reference of course and practice should happen after the computer forecast!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:13 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,182
Re: Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

I agree with the above posts-- the Ball. Plex is a little easier to apply as a ballistic reticle since that's what it is. Applying a ranging reticle as a ballistic reticle is accurate also but takes a little more work to figure the zeros and interpolation with. One big advantage to a reticle that has multiple stadia along the horizontal axis though is that windage is easier to apply if you're so inclined.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:44 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,221
Re: Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

[ QUOTE ]
the Mil-Dot system is just that a system for measuring objects to estimate range. Yes they can be used as hlod over points but I woulden't trust them past about 400yds ,<snip>
The Burris system was desgined as a set of hold over points and <snip> they will be alot closer to an even set of yardage marks than mils would be

[/ QUOTE ]

JD,
I don't understand the above explanation? I'm shying away from any ballistic plex reticle for the same reason you are shying away from the mil dot?

It must be a left/right brain thing.

The only thing I would like to see added to a mil dot retical is a 1/2 Mil hash mark. Discerning .1 mil is pretty straight forward for .1, .2 and .8 and .9 for me as the mil dot is 0.1 mil from center to edge. Its the tenths around the 1/2 mil mark that are less discernable for me. The MP-8 reticle is nearly perfect to my way of thinking.

Also, reticle in the first focal plane (FFP) is a must IMO. The size of the dot just helps hone things in a little better rather than covering the target.

Also, ranging and mil dot reticles in the second focal plane leave a bit to be desired as it is difficult to ensure the power is set 'exactly' to the calibrated power.

Does Burris make any FFP reticles or is there anyone that makes these modifications as Premier used to for Leuy's??

BTW, If I wouldn't spend so many $ on ADL furniture I could afford a good scope. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
__________________
I may be the slowest guy on the mountain . . . . but . . . . I'm on the mountain!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-20-2006, 11:53 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,856
Re: Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?

I hear ya those ADL trigger guards are a killer on the wallet.

What I was saying was that the mil-dots are set a specific point so that your able to bracket objects in between them and such to get a better estimate on the range. trying to use the dots as an aiming point is kinda rough especialy on smaller targets at longer range.
The Balistic plex on the other hand was setup and the lines are spaced so that they will be close to wanted yardage marks , granted if your wanting 50yd markers for a 7STW or 200yd markers for a 308 then it'll probably be kind frustrating. I believe that Burris has a deal on their web site that will better explain and give you a ball park idea of where the cross marks will be in relation to your range.

I haven't used the Burris reticle but have used the Swarovski TDS and it works well.
__________________
Si Vis Pacem Parabellum
Molon Labe
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Nikon Mil dot or Burris Ballistic Plex?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Accuracy of Burris Ballistic Plex or Leupold Long Range Plex Reticles dmnelson15 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 13 07-27-2009 11:25 PM
WTB/WTT for used Burris Fullfield II ballistic plex outdoorfan Optics For Sale 6 04-19-2009 09:48 PM
Burris Ballistic Plex vs. Nikon BDC Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 13 04-14-2009 03:37 PM
Burris Ballistic Plex Tyler Kemp Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 14 05-11-2008 10:55 AM
Burris Ballistic Plex todbartell Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 8 07-14-2003 02:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC