Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

New March 2.5-25x52

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 06-11-2014, 08:19 AM
scf scf is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 80
Re: New March 2.5-25x52

I've printed some eye charts to help compare the two March models. I will also take my Z5 for comparison. My initial thoughts are that the March glass is as good or better than the Swarovski but I will compare them side by side.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2014, 11:50 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 185
Re: New March 2.5-25x52

Very interested to hear how it compares to the swaro. I am considering the Z6 3x18x50, the Leupold VX6 3x18x44, and the March 2.5x.25x42 hunter version.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-12-2014, 08:56 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 208
Re: New March 2.5-25x52

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Oregonian View Post
Very interested to hear how it compares to the swaro. I am considering the Z6 3x18x50, the Leupold VX6 3x18x44, and the March 2.5x.25x42 hunter version.
The hunter version does not have a zerostop I believe?!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-13-2014, 01:07 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 605
Re: New March 2.5-25x52

Sure look like amazing scopes... I'm also very interested in hearing side by side range report of the 42 vs 52 vs Z5. Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-15-2014, 08:53 AM
scf scf is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 80
Re: New March 2.5-25x52

Finally got a chance to compare some scopes. Unfortunately the 52mm March was on a rifle that was at the smith having a Manners T2 fitted. I compared the March 2.5-25x42 tactical, Swarovski Z5 3.5-18x44 BT, and a Nightforce NXS 5.5-22x56. The scopes were all mounted on rifles and sat on a SEB NEO front rest with a large Edgewood rest bag (this is my F class setup). I used two different eye charts at 119 yards. The time was 7-8 AM. With all scopes set at 18X to match the max setting of the Z5 I observed the charts over an extended time period switching them as the light conditions changed. For me it was difficult to establish a clear difference in resolution between all 3. If I had to rank them I might give an ever so slight advantage to the March with the Z5 a very, very close second with the NXS right behind. The differences in line resolution between all three is minor at best and it took me about an hour to finally reach that decision. Moving the March on up to it's max setting of 25X did gain some resolution. All three of these are great scopes and they all have distinct features suitable for given applications. Overall I would choose the March because of it's 10x zoom range, illumination and weight. If I were building an ultra lite ounce counter mountain rifle that I did not intend to push beyond about 800 yards I'd pick the Z5 plus it is also the lowest priced. If I didn't have a hammer and needed something to drive nails I'd use the NXS. I also took a look through a Leupold VX III 4.4-14x50 and this scope didn't compare to the others at 14x but neither did the price. Finally I took a peek through my spotter. The Nikon Fieldscope 20-75x82 set at 20x put all of the fine scopes to shame but that wasn't really a fair comparison. Hopefully when I get the 52mm March back I will be able to do some low light testing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-15-2014, 02:46 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 605
Re: New March 2.5-25x52

Quote:
Originally Posted by scf View Post
Finally got a chance to compare some scopes. Unfortunately the 52mm March was on a rifle that was at the smith having a Manners T2 fitted. I compared the March 2.5-25x42 tactical, Swarovski Z5 3.5-18x44 BT, and a Nightforce NXS 5.5-22x56. The scopes were all mounted on rifles and sat on a SEB NEO front rest with a large Edgewood rest bag (this is my F class setup). I used two different eye charts at 119 yards. The time was 7-8 AM. With all scopes set at 18X to match the max setting of the Z5 I observed the charts over an extended time period switching them as the light conditions changed. For me it was difficult to establish a clear difference in resolution between all 3. If I had to rank them I might give an ever so slight advantage to the March with the Z5 a very, very close second with the NXS right behind. The differences in line resolution between all three is minor at best and it took me about an hour to finally reach that decision. Moving the March on up to it's max setting of 25X did gain some resolution. All three of these are great scopes and they all have distinct features suitable for given applications. Overall I would choose the March because of it's 10x zoom range, illumination and weight. If I were building an ultra lite ounce counter mountain rifle that I did not intend to push beyond about 800 yards I'd pick the Z5 plus it is also the lowest priced. If I didn't have a hammer and needed something to drive nails I'd use the NXS. I also took a look through a Leupold VX III 4.4-14x50 and this scope didn't compare to the others at 14x but neither did the price. Finally I took a peek through my spotter. The Nikon Fieldscope 20-75x82 set at 20x put all of the fine scopes to shame but that wasn't really a fair comparison. Hopefully when I get the 52mm March back I will be able to do some low light testing.
Great info, thanks for the writeup!. What I take from this, is that the March scopes are in fact in the lead with the entire package. I don't think it will be any comparison with the 52mm tactical... I would guess that sucker is going to be the clear winner here based on overall performance and for one heck of a great weight for a Long Range rig. However, it also sounds like the Z5 and the NXS are very, very close in optical performance. Also interesting comparison to the VX III and how it does not compare.

Big problem I have with the March 52mm tactical, is the price! I am literally drooling over that scope, but I just don't think I can part with that kind of $$. I think once price comes into the equation, the 5.5-22x56 for $1980 ends up being the winner... but you pay for it with an extra 7.5 ounces of weight.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-15-2014, 05:00 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 185
Re: New March 2.5-25x52

I am starting to lean hard towards the March 52 tactical. The other options I am seriously considering are a Z6 swarovski and a VX6 3x18x44 or 50, but if I had to decide today it would be the March.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC