close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics

Reply

Mil-dot vs. BDC

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Unread 01-04-2011, 05:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 12
Re: Mil-dot vs. BDC

The Mil-Dot is, in my opinion much more versatile than the BDC, with The major benefit being the ability to range your target with simple math(I do it and i'm only 11). In the long run I believe you will be much more satisfied with the Mil-Dot reticle.
Reply With Quote
  •   #9  
    Unread 01-04-2011, 06:03 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2005
    Location: USA
    Posts: 2,598
    Re: Mil-dot vs. BDC

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Loner View Post
    Ones for rangefinding and one is for adjusting your aim after you know your range.
    Mils are an angular measurement as is MOA and both can be and are used for trajectory correction
    __________________
    range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
    Reply With Quote

      #10  
    Unread 01-04-2011, 09:04 PM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: NW Mt.
    Posts: 599
    Re: Mil-dot vs. BDC

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jwp475 View Post
    Mils are an angular measurement as is MOA and both can be and are used for trajectory correction
    Any reticle with markings on it can be used for ranging or drop compensating. Even
    the old lupy duplex is a rangefinder of sorts. But mil dot scopes are not made for hold
    over, they are made for rangefinding, Bullet Drop Compensators are designed for just
    that. They each have a distinct advantage in their appropriate field of use. And I have
    moa scopes that are made for rangefinding, that wasn't the op's question.
    Reply With Quote
      #11  
    Unread 01-04-2011, 10:03 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2010
    Location: Smalltown, Virginia
    Posts: 477
    Re: Mil-dot vs. BDC

    wonder why nikon has a ballistics and compensating program for their mildots then? Im confused.

    Last edited by ishootkittens; 01-04-2011 at 10:07 PM.
    Reply With Quote
      #12  
    Unread 01-04-2011, 10:42 PM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: NW Mt.
    Posts: 599
    Re: Mil-dot vs. BDC

    I don't know about the nikon specifically but if you have a drop compensator made
    up for a certain load and gun it's markings, whether on the turrets or in the reticle
    will be on 100, 150,200,250,300 etc.. or the graduations of your choice. A moa or
    mildot scope your load will be on the marks at random distances. 110, 168, 214, 278
    etc.. Now you can adjust your aim for it but it is not as convenient as having them on
    the major yardages. Inch per hundred yard or IPHY reticles and dials are my personnel
    favorite.
    Do some reading on how to use the various scopes you are interested in and you will
    gain an understanding of how they work and what they do best. Most of us use rangefinders.
    The only time I really use my scopes ranging finding capabilities in the field has been during
    snowfalls and very cold temps when my rangefinder failed.
    Reply With Quote
      #13  
    Unread 01-05-2011, 08:19 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: buffalo, OK
    Posts: 373
    Re: Mil-dot vs. BDC

    The mildot card for the military even has hold over for your zero. The mildot was designed for much more than just ranging. That is only 1 part of it's design. One of it's designs was to have multiple zeros for fast target engagement, wind hold over.designed to allow the shooter to estimate accurately the range to a target, to compensate for the bullet drop, and to compensate for the windage required due to crosswinds

    From 1 of the designers of the mil dot reticle:
    designed to allow the shooter to estimate accurately the range to a target, to compensate for the bullet drop, and to compensate for the windage required due to crosswinds, and be non caliber specific.

    Last edited by mikebob; 01-05-2011 at 08:57 AM.
    Reply With Quote
      #14  
    Unread 01-05-2011, 06:21 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2010
    Location: Smalltown, Virginia
    Posts: 477
    Re: Mil-dot vs. BDC

    Those turret scopes sound AWSOME, but i bet they are rather expensive. Any recommendations? For under 500 bucks hehe... sorry, im a college kid!
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC