Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

mil dot vs. Ballistic

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:50 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 33
mil dot vs. Ballistic

So who all has experience with either of these reticles and what do you think of them. Thinkin of getting a new varmint scope this spring and am stuck on which way to go. I know the new ballistic reticles are designed to be easier to use and just as effective as a mil dot so does that make a mil dot outdated. Not looking for extra long range, max is probably only going to be 500-600. I know you can get really good with the mil dot but it takes a lot more practice. So which way would be better and more practical.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2012, 11:45 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NW MT
Posts: 2,551
Re: mil dot vs. Ballistic

I have mildots, but now there are variations of them that I like better. There are hollow mils, and I like the TMR buy leupold, the middlle is open and it has 1mil and 1/2 mil and a section of 1/5 mil, one of my favs.I use the mildot in my 325 wsm and get right to 725 for holds and reference 1/2 mils also
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2012, 11:47 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: las vegas
Posts: 165
Re: mil dot vs. Ballistic

i think that both have there advantage. the mill dot will be more versatile as ballistic reticles are set for specific velocities so your loads need to match the reticle. maybe not exactly but you still need to be close. on the other hand when shooting varmints you don't have allot of time to do math so using the mill dot to range find can be a pain. using the turrets to click in the appropriate bullet drop will be more precise but if pushed for time the hold over on the ballistic will be more accurate. not sure if that helps. good luck
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2012, 12:41 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 813
Re: mil dot vs. Ballistic

The ballistic mil dot from Burris can give you the best of both worlds. You could use the mil dots in the upper cross hair for range estimation if you really needed to and the ballistic lines in the bottom cross hair line up surprisingly well for many cartridges. I have the reticle in 3 of my scopes and it allows me to get to 700 yards in all of them.

The reticle is not too busy and is easily adapted to many cartridges. A simple ballistic reticle is not super precise when compared to dialing for your shots, but it's way faster then dialing and with a little practice it's precise enough for any hunting situation I've encountered.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:21 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sw ks
Posts: 314
Re: mil dot vs. Ballistic

The nikon reticle is the best IMHO. It has an extra circle and is good to 750 with many rounds. I have found it to be deadlier than a NF {gasp} for stuff under 800. Its just faster.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:32 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NW MT
Posts: 2,551
Re: mil dot vs. Ballistic

My TMR TAKES ME RIGHT TO 825 in my elk rifle, holds are the same as dial up, and on any power since it is ffp
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2012, 08:26 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,222
Re: mil dot vs. Ballistic

I own both styles. I have used mil dots for several years and and use them for windage, leads, ranging, and POI correction. You will have to do some homework and apply some math to be proficient. I agree with prior posts that the TMR is more effective for use as a ballistic Reticle compared to standard dots. Once you figure out impact points, which you have to do with all of them, it works well.. I have a Mark 4, TMR on my coyote rig. If I have the time, especially on the longer shots, I prefer to dial in. It will be more precise. I also own a Leupold that has an Advanced Reticle Technology, reticle which is similar to the Burris described in a prior post, and a Leupold Varmint Reticle. The ART is a hybrid of both, but I didn't warm up to it. They are both pretty easy to set up and use. If you are just interested in using the scope for elevation and windage using basic MOA data, go with a ballistic Reticle. If you are committed to understanding and applying mil dot technology, go with the mil dot.IMO.
__________________

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready"-T. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: mil dot vs. Ballistic
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
243 Win/ 95 gr Ballistic Tip sendero72 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 04-14-2011 03:12 AM
ballistic FTE 7mm mag sendero Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 04-07-2010 09:59 PM
ballistic help screech General Discussion 11 03-08-2007 12:16 PM
ballistic mil-dot mooser Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 7 01-27-2007 10:21 PM
combined tech. ballistic silver tip /Nosler ballistic tip winmagman Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 10-27-2003 06:26 PM

Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.93%
1,525 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.17%
1,892 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.07%
1,357 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.00%
588 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.91%
230 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.93%
290 Votes
Total Votes: 5,882
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC