close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics

Reply

Mark IV 6.5-20

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 07-08-2009, 11:24 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 83
Mark IV 6.5-20

I am ready to purchase a scope for my 338 Lapua improved. Is there any reason not to purchase the Mark IV 6.5-20 for long range applications compared to comparably priced scopes? Have thought about the NXS, but weight and price sway me back to the Leupold. The Zeiss Conquest and Sightron were considered, but I like the aspect of a 30mm tube with solid/audible clicks that the Mark IV offers. I currently have an IOR on another rifle which I love, but that rifle is not braked, while the 338 is ---- and recently learned that IOR's can fail with brakes. Any input is welcomed.
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 07-09-2009, 12:44 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2004
    Location: Texas
    Posts: 7,001
    Re: Mark IV 6.5-20

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by 284stak View Post
    I am ready to purchase a scope for my 338 Lapua improved. Is there any reason not to purchase the Mark IV 6.5-20 for long range applications compared to comparably priced scopes? Have thought about the NXS, but weight and price sway me back to the Leupold. The Zeiss Conquest and Sightron were considered, but I like the aspect of a 30mm tube with solid/audible clicks that the Mark IV offers. I currently have an IOR on another rifle which I love, but that rifle is not braked, while the 338 is ---- and recently learned that IOR's can fail with brakes. Any input is welcomed.
    Leupold makes the mark 4 6.5x20x50 in both the standard models and the front focal Plane
    models with a wide selection of reticules. The ffp models are a little higher in price but some
    people swear buy the Front focal plane scopes.

    They weigh just over 2 pounds and have lots of eye relief.

    The glass in these scopes is very good and for the money they are hard to beat.

    Every scope I buy nowadays has a 30mm tube and side focus With very few exceptions
    because of strength and overall length Plus the side focus is quick and easy to use.

    J E CUSTOM
    __________________
    "PRESS ON"
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 07-09-2009, 01:04 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2007
    Location: Phoenix, AZ
    Posts: 20
    Re: Mark IV 6.5-20

    The biggest difference I've been able to notice is the ruggedness of dials and internals between the Leupold and Nightforce. I also had some lash issues with one of my Leupold MK4s. Leupold fixed it no questions asked, but I haven't ever had to send back my NXS.

    I'm pretty hard on my stuff though; both are more than adequate choices. An interesting thing though, I'm sure this stir up a mess of 'you're crazy' responses...

    I lent my Leupy MK4 6.5 to my buddy for his .338LM for the last few months while he scope shopped. He brought a Millett LRS along with him and put it through the paces from 800-1200 yards. My guess is the average Joe would see little difference between the two; eye relief was a bit worse. Just an opinion, but maybe the heat got to me...
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 07-09-2009, 01:58 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2005
    Location: Utah
    Posts: 1,375
    Re: Mark IV 6.5-20

    I have used the Mark 4 and NXS side by side, several times. Simply put, the mark 4 is my second choice scope for LRH, after the NXS. I doubt you'll be dissapointed with the mark 4.

    If weight were an issue, I'd use the mark 4.
    Using cost as a factor, the mark 4 is priced too close to the Nightforce.

    Couple other observations / impressions:
    The NXS has slightly better glass.
    The size and weight of the NXS is apropriate for a long range rig.
    The NP R1 is a tremendous asset and worth the price difference by itself.
    The NXS offers the impression of extreme ruggedness and accuracy. I beleive it delivers.

    The mark 4 is a nice scope.
    It is perfectly servicable.
    It is 10 oz lighter.
    It is a few hundred dollars cheaper.
    It does have a reputation for some backlash.

    It's obvious which I prefer. But, we are talking about #1 and #2. It's personal preference and application... If you'd like to handle the NXS, I'll be happy to bring it up.

    Last edited by grit; 07-09-2009 at 04:20 PM.
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 07-14-2009, 06:29 PM
    Official LRH Sponsor
     
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Location: Sacramento
    Posts: 1,248
    Re: Mark IV 6.5-20

    We sale both and I use both Leupold and Nightforce myself and I will say that the Nightforce is a better scope for reliability, tacking, and the glass is better. With this said I have been happy with the Leupold and trust it for the most part. I cannot afford to put Nightforce, USO, S&B, and Premier Reticle scopes on all my rifles and Leupold does the job well.

    If you go with a Nightforce I recommend getting it with the turrets matching.

    Mike @ CSGW
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: Mark IV 6.5-20
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    X Mark Pro Adjustable and x mark triggers for sale tnshooter111 Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 4 08-27-2011 11:32 PM
    My new Mark 4 Daves762 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 10 05-26-2011 11:37 PM
    Mark 4 lr/t huffsd Trade, Freebie and Loan 4 10-27-2010 12:13 PM
    weatherby Mark 5 Fiber mark camoman80 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 5 09-04-2009 10:31 AM
    Mark IV 4.5-14x50 LR/T M1 with Mark IV Rings FS OKbow87 Optics For Sale 2 02-15-2009 04:39 AM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC