Originally Posted by phorwath
Have you directly compared an SIII to a Mark4? Like one of the prior posters did? The one that said the SIII walked away from the Mark4?
For there to be value to your post, you need to explain your basis for it.
Dude, just having some fun with you guys. And btw I don't waste my time with sightron as good as they may be because I simply don't have the time.. What I have compared for years, in field use conditions, is about every scope worth saying. I have run a many leupy agnist my schmidts(classics,pm2s and zeniths many of all.), hsoldts and my diavaris, swaros phs and alines, kahles, many NFs a few IORs and an elite or 2. So the it was night and day comments really cracks me up on this stuff. We run 3x to 40x boosters on res and try them til dark not dusk under many non moonlit nights. I am sure the s3 is a solid scope with excellent glass. As far as what some guy said somewhere else I could G A S. I take what I see not someone else with an agenda or bias. Its fun to play around with glass and lord knows they are getting out of reach for many of us price wise. Its good we now so many good companies to choose from. Word of advice, if at all possible try as many as you can in as many different conditions as you can, and box test them all and you will find yourself a well made optic.