Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Leupold LR or Not to LR

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:28 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern British Columbia
Posts: 19
Leupold LR or Not to LR

Hi guys. Love the forum, just starting out here with the gear that will do something I've loved to do for a looong time.

My question is, on the weekend I purchased a .300UM, Rem 700 XCR, Boyds Pepper Laminate Stock (JRS style) and Talley Lightweights. Now as to the optics. I'm set on a Leupold. 4.5 - 14 X 40, with the Boone and Crockett Reticle. Thats my dream rifle. How important is the side parallax nob? Leupold makes the scope with and without the side parallax nob, how many people actually have used it? Own one? If you didn't have the side nob, would you notice a difference?

Thanks guys,
DAve
__________________
Once you pull the trigger, you better be prepared to finish the job.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:57 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,856
Re: Leupold LR or Not to LR

The side focus is nice as you can adjust the focus with disturbing the gun as much and breaking your fit to the gun while in position. I have a couple of scope with them and without , would I pay another $50-100 for just the side focus ? NO , but the LR scopes if I'm not mistaken also have more internal adjustment.

the 4.5-14 is a good scope but for the money their are better scope to be had.I like my Nikon Monarch 5.5-16x44mm better than any leupold in the same power class except for my old origonal MK-4 fixed 16 power.
Also for a little bit more money I.O.R makes some awsome glass thats a good bit brighter and clearer than any Leupold.
__________________
Si Vis Pacem Parabellum
Molon Labe
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2007, 08:00 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 486
Re: Leupold LR or Not to LR

Do with the side focus. It is alot easier to dial out paralax in the pron position.

Example I was shooting some F-class last night with an older AO and it was a pain to reach while trying to get it set up .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2007, 09:55 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 920
Re: Leupold LR or Not to LR

If your shooting varies from real close range to long range a lot, while your actually hunting... then SF is worth it.

But if the only time you are shooting at ranges of ~100 yds is when you are working up load, then it's not worth it, plus the side focus is more difficult to set accurately... and the Leupold system has a fair amount of backlash... which means that you can set it, and after the recoil, you can have a bunch of parallax on the next shot.

I can't speak for other makers, but the Leupold SF is fussy, difficult to properly calibrate, not too accurate in the field - I'm not knocking them - I have three of the very top end Leupolds (street price of $1,300+) with SF.

Just pick the one that will work best.

The AO is more accurate, and much more repeatable.

If your field shooting ranges from 200 to 1000+, you can set an AO at 400 to 1000yds, and be fine for all of your shooting.

.
__________________
Here, kitty kitty kitty.

LRH member #23
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2007, 11:01 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 35
Re: Leupold LR or Not to LR

Thanks Catshooter:

I didn't know that about the SF on the Leupold!

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2007, 04:54 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 1,219
Re: Leupold LR or Not to LR

I use the Monarch w/ adjustable objective lense, and I just found out that flip up scope covers don't really work with this. If your focus is at 100 for quick shooting when you have the cap on the up position, then the cap will be upside down when you focus out to a different range such as 600 yards. Just my two cents.
__________________
I used to re-load but now I "hand-load".
-- Well, at least I try --
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-11-2007, 09:22 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 558
Re: Leupold LR or Not to LR

kodiakhntr,
One thing to remember that has not been mentioned if it is a LR with a side focus it has a 30mm tube if it has a AO it is a 1" tube.
UB
__________________
Attitude:
It takes 43 muscle's to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger pull.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Leupold LR or Not to LR
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LEUPOLD 12X40mm - AO - Tall Turrets - Leupold Dot - SOLD - SALE COMPLETE Lefty G-gear Optics For Sale 3 04-13-2011 12:51 AM
Reduced: LEUPOLD 12X40mm - AO - Tall Turrets - Leupold Dot w/crosshairs - photos Lefty G-gear Optics For Sale 0 03-07-2011 12:45 PM
Reduced: LEUPOLD 12X40mm - AO - Tall Turrets - Leupold Dot w/crosshairs - photos Lefty G-gear Optics For Sale 1 03-05-2011 08:25 AM
Reduced: LEUPOLD 12X40mm - AO - Tall Turrets - Leupold Dot w/crosshairs - photos Lefty G-gear Optics For Sale 0 03-03-2011 09:36 AM
Remington 700 BDL Custom Deluxe 338 Ultra with Leupold, Also Leupold VX-2 3-9x40 Silv highridge1 Guns For Sale 7 10-08-2008 03:51 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC