Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Leica -vs- Swarovski

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:17 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,651
Leica -vs- Swarovski

Ok guys, I have my money, and I am ready to buy a good range finder. I have been using a Bushnell 1000 Yarding Pro, I like it, but I am ready for a High Tech range finder that will read consistantly out to 1200 to 1500 yards. Bill Baily, if you are reading this post, I am sorry I never called you regarding the Swarovski. I am still trying to decide if I want the Swarovski or the Leica. My question is, is the Swarovski worth the extra $340.00? I found a Leica for $549.99 and a Swarvoski for $889.00. I have heard from only a few regarding this topic, and I would like some more info from poeple, from this post, before I make my final decision. Is the Swarovski that much better than the Leica? Will I get better readings at longer distances with Swarovski? I really don't mind spending the extra money if Swarovski's are that much better. However, if Leica is just as good and there is really not that much of a difference between the two, than I will probably go with the Leica. Furthermore, I needed a pair of good binos, so I just did the same thing regarding binoculars. I asked questions, however, I was able to go to a gun shop and look through all the ones I heard were worth looking at. I looked at three different pairs of binoculars, Swarovski 10x50 Binos at $1,599.99, Stiener 12x50 binos at $859.99 and Leupold 12x50 Olympic Wind River Binos for $389.99. They were all great and of course the Swarovskis were very nice and clear. I went with the Leupold 12x50 Wind Rivers, they were very impressive for the price. After looking through all of them, I couldn't justify spending $1,200.00 or $500.00 more. But when it come to range finding, I don't mind spending the extra cash. If you don't have an accurate way to measure distances, than your going to have many misses in the field. Any info would be great. I did see a post on here where you could vote regarding range finders. However, it did not include Swarovski in the pole. The overall winner in that pole was Leica in a blow out.

Thanks
Wildcat
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:40 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,598
Re: Leica -vs- Swarovski


I have owned both a Leica 1200 LRF and a Swarvoski 1500 and the Swarvorski will out range the Leica in less than optimum conditions by a considerable distance. In bright sunlight in the desert on days when the Leica would not range past 600 yards the Swarvoski would range out to 1030 yards consistantly, for me the Swarvoski rules.
For price I bought mine at Hunters Edge(660--627-2277) for less than the prices that you quoted
__________________
range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:48 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hoosier
Posts: 222
Re: Leica -vs- Swarovski

I posted on that thread, I love my Geovids by leica. If you can part with about 1600 bills you can have great glass and a 1300 yard rangefinder. Mine will range reflective targets at the max range consistantly in bright sunlight. Dogs at over 1000, trees at 1200, and grass at 1150. My only complaint would be the lack of tripod mount. After a few hunts spent looking thru a spotting scope, then getting the rangefinders out, then re-aquiring the target for a range is a struggle. Plus you get a headache from clenching one eye shut. Swaro makes great junk, top shelf! The idea of one less piece of equipment in the field made me spend the bucks.
__________________
Beware the fury of a patient man....

Be kind to your neighbors... shoot quietly..
WWW.Gem-tech.com
WWW.Advanced-Armament.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:49 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: on the rifle range in Utah
Posts: 2,723
Re: Leica -vs- Swarovski

The answer to your question is easy. Go with the Leica Geovids. That way you have ultra long range ranging capability AND a great pair of binos all in one unit!

If I didn't already have a pair of Swaro 10x42 slc's and a Leica 1200 LRF, I would buy a pair of Geovids in a heartbeat. Hell, maybe I'll get a pair anyway! I just can't talk myself into the Swaro rangefinder yet. I used one on 5 hunts this year and it had no problem ranging things past 1500 yards but I absolutely loathe the huge aiming circle, and the gigantic lasing button on top is hard to push without moving the whole unit off target. It also has no case or lens covers so your 900 dollars worth of glass is hanging out waiting to gather dust and scratches.

Fix those few things and it will be perfect.

I think Leupolds new RX 4 will be worth waiting for based on the info I got from the shot show.

Also, Pete Lincoln (the German dude) is reportedly meeting with Leica to inform them of our wishes for a new compact rangefinder. It might just go to 2000 yards and cost less than $1,000. Time will tell.


The Leica 1200 lrf in the meanwhile is still one heck of a unit. For over 2 years, it was the best and it is still hard to beat. However, when I shot a buffalo last month from long range, the Leica would not give me a reading! The sun was at a bad angle but that was no excuse. I have had it read much smaller critters at around the same range with no problem before. For some reason, it choked that day. Thank goodness I had the Swaro there to give me a reading of 1066! Beamed it 4 times in a row with no problems.
__________________
Find it
Range it
Click it
Pull it
Dump it

If it's not far, it's boring.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:52 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hoosier
Posts: 222
Re: Leica -vs- Swarovski

Beat ya GG! Great minds think alike.... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
__________________
Beware the fury of a patient man....

Be kind to your neighbors... shoot quietly..
WWW.Gem-tech.com
WWW.Advanced-Armament.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2006, 11:24 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,651
Re: Leica -vs- Swarovski

My Leupold Binoculars are on the way, so I am not looking for a combo. I am just looking for the Range Finder. It sounds like you would pick the Swarovskis if they change a few things. Thanks for the feed back, hopefully I will continue to get some more feed back. I will make my final decision tomorrow night.

Thanks, Wildcat
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2006, 09:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 16
Re: Leica -vs- Swarovski

I just bought a used Swarovski Laser Guide from SWFA on thier Sample List for 699.95. They are as good as everyone says.
Here is the link, hope it works OK.
http://www.samplelist.com/default.asp?di...hide_sold=false
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Leica -vs- Swarovski
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swarovski vs. Leica? Elk Chaser Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 1 09-22-2010 02:42 PM
Swarovski & Leica gr8fuldoug Sponsors Marketplace 2 11-20-2009 02:45 PM
Swarovski,zeiss,&leica for sale!!!! vkbailey Optics For Sale 1 09-02-2009 01:04 AM
swarovski vs leica Booney Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 10 11-03-2008 08:07 PM
Leica Swarovski for sale joelbiltz Guns For Sale 1 11-10-2005 12:28 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC