Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Horus Vision, anyone like them???

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2010, 12:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rising Star, Tx
Posts: 21
Horus Vision, anyone like them???

I've been hearing about these for a few years. Just wondering if anyone like the horus vision line of optic. I don't wat to spend $1000-1500 to see one for the first time. Are they clear? How do they rate against mark 4 or nightforce?
__________________
If you lack the confidence to pull the trigger don't.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2010, 11:16 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Truckee
Posts: 293
Re: Horus Vision, anyone like them???

I have a 4-16x Raptor model that was on sale last year for $850 directly from the companies head quarter.

Love it due to easy measuring, quick second shot placement, and is nice to have when the battery powered rangefinder doesn't work.

The hawk optic is not designed for beyond 600 yards. Optic doesn't adjust so distant places are blurry. Raptor and Falcon models both easily go up to 2000 yards. Nice to have H25 reticle and good range of elevation adjustment.

I often use the turret only for long range shot but the reticle is just as effective and is perfect for quick shots. The turret is also easy to take off (one screw to loosen) for resetting to zero purpose, unlike leupold you need a special allen wrench (three screws to loosen) to reset zero due to condition changes.

As for comparison? All I can say is I been able to make shots in low light situation and the horizon hasn't stopped me yet. Nightforce is probably obviously a better scope. Not sure about leupold.

Another thing is all of Horus Vision scopes focal plane is not an issue cause it is in the front. Meaning you can shoot at any power if using reticle hold-over. Night force front focal scopes are over $2,200 and Leupold front focal scopes are over $1500.

Man this lengthy!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2010, 11:19 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Truckee
Posts: 293
Re: Horus Vision, anyone like them???

Don't get me wrong about the hawk model that I say it only goes to 600 yards, it is capable of shooting over 1000 yards accurately. Under 600 yards, the glass is good.

Last edited by theodore; 01-17-2010 at 11:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-21-2010, 08:45 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 846
Re: Horus Vision, anyone like them???

I used a Hawk on my 204 ruger for a prairie dog hunt.
It was awesome and the reticle makes it easy to shoot quickly at various ranges
Most shots were between 200 and 400yds. It was fast and easy to go to long and short range using the reticle. 1 shot kills were the norm.
The glass is clear and bright.

Last edited by RockZ; 01-21-2010 at 11:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-21-2010, 10:32 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 4422′44″N 1082′35″W
Posts: 3,816
Re: Horus Vision, anyone like them???

My dad has one on his McMillan 50 BMG that goes out to 2400 or 2500 yards and it seems clear as any of my leupold, or zeiss scopes even my Leica Binos.... Hard to beat a Leupold IMO I have never seen anything clearer. just equal to.. I have 3000 dollar Binos and they seem no more clear than my Leupold.. But yeah Horus Vision seems good from my limited experience

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-04-2010, 11:09 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Truckee
Posts: 293
Re: Horus Vision, anyone like them???

Quote:
Originally Posted by theodore View Post
I have a 4-16x Raptor model that was on sale last year for $850 directly from the companies head quarter.

Love it due to easy measuring, quick second shot placement, and is nice to have when the battery powered rangefinder doesn't work.

The hawk optic is not designed for beyond 600 yards. Optic doesn't adjust so distant places are blurry. Raptor and Falcon models both easily go up to 2000 yards. Nice to have H25 reticle and good range of elevation adjustment.

I often use the turret only for long range shot but the reticle is just as effective and is perfect for quick shots. The turret is also easy to take off (one screw to loosen) for resetting to zero purpose, unlike leupold you need a special allen wrench (three screws to loosen) to reset zero due to condition changes.

As for comparison? All I can say is I been able to make shots in low light situation and the horizon hasn't stopped me yet. Nightforce is probably obviously a better scope. Not sure about leupold.

Another thing is all of Horus Vision scopes focal plane is not an issue cause it is in the front. Meaning you can shoot at any power if using reticle hold-over. Night force front focal scopes are over $2,200 and Leupold front focal scopes are over $1500.

Man this lengthy!
With 1.5 year of owning the raptor, Bottom line, the two huge weaknesses are not able to hold the zero reliably and it is not waterproof. Had to replace it within the one year warranty due to water filling up in it. It happened on the very first day of snow in the sierras, maybe 25 degrees at its coldest during night time. FRUSTRATING!

The nikon prostaff for under $200 is a more water proof than this dang raptor! Leupold crushes, I mean crushes the raptor for waterproof and reliablity of turret.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-04-2010, 03:55 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Patagonia Mountains, Arizona
Posts: 752
Re: Horus Vision, anyone like them???

I have a Horus Falcon with the H37 illuminated reticle. I like the concept and "feel" of the mil grid reticle with 0.2 milli-radian subdivisions. It gives the precision of shooting using target knobs but without the wasted time or potential errors of knob twisting and click counting. So far I have no complaints with the ruggedness of the scope, though it is heavy at two pounds. It's optical quality is satisfactory. I'd prefer to have the same reticle (the Horus H37) in a lightweight, rugged, and simple 16x40 scope similar to a Leupold Mk 4 M1. I wouldn't object to a lower price than either of them. I don't find the illuminated reticle to be of any use, though it would be if a Horus style mil grid reticle was installed in a 10x night vision scope with a Gen III image intensifier. That might be a bit expensive. Horus reticles are available in US Optics scopes, but I wouldn't spend that kind of money and not get night vision capability too.

Additional things I like about the Horus Falcon, mostly because it has a mil grid reticle, is that it's a scope that can be easily moved between rifles. I can record the "zero" setting for each rifle, then move the scope which is on quick release Picatinny mounts. That way the windage/elevation knobs are only changed when moving the scope, or to re-zero on a particular rifle while the mil grid remains correct for any rifle. It's possible to do that for a conventional target knob scope but it's more tedious. The grid reticle also makes zeroing a rifle very simple since it can measure the error of a shot precisely in both axes, then just click in both offsets. It makes "one shot" zeroing nearly as easy as with the dual reticle Shepherd scopes. Gimmicks? maybe, but the grid aiming certainly is not a gimmick. It's not a "ballistic compensated reticle". All ballistic calculations still have to be done external to the scope. But for the same reason it works with any bullet, velocity, and atmosphere.

The grid reticle can be used for range finding just like a a mil-dot reticle can, but it has the same limitations for the precision of the distance measurements. I use a laser range finder instead. The Horus scope does not provide any significant advantage or disadvantage compared to other scopes for estimating crosswinds or wind deflection, but it does allow fast and precise windage offsets.

I'm of the opinion the mil grid reticle is a good concept at variable ranges where external range finders and wind instruments with lookup tables or computers are necessary. It's not for target shooting at fixed distances or for short range hunting. If it holds together I'll have no regrets from having spent $1600. Time will tell.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Horus Vision, anyone like them???
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horus Vision ASLI texan79 Other Stuff For Sale 3 07-06-2011 07:26 AM
horus vision JWB Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 8 11-17-2010 03:56 AM
Horus vision Scopes? kc Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 6 11-09-2010 07:04 PM
WTB Horus Vision Anti-Cant/ACI angus-5024 Optics For Sale 0 03-28-2010 10:02 PM
Horus Vision GBTx01 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 12 06-29-2008 07:52 PM

Current Poll
How Many Different Cartridges Do You Reload For?
ZERO, all factory ammo - 7.99%
349 Votes
1 - 2.79%
122 Votes
2 or 3 - 14.57%
636 Votes
4 or 5 - 20.32%
887 Votes
6 or 7 - 14.86%
649 Votes
8 or 9 - 8.66%
378 Votes
10 or more - 30.81%
1,345 Vote
Total Votes: 4,366
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC