Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

FFP or SFP Please vote

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 11-13-2012, 04:39 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Washington
Posts: 123
Re: FFP or SFP Please vote

Im with Broz on this one! I see the value in a FFP, but the SFP is what I prefer.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-13-2012, 04:51 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,170
Re: FFP or SFP Please vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcebcj View Post
If you are not going to dial wind take a look at the Vortex Viper HS LR. Vortex got really smart and built a scope that's really functional for the hunter that hand carries the rifle a lot or uses the rifle horseback where it sits in a scabbard by just capping the windage turret so it's not poking you in the wrist and hanging up when putting in or taking it out of a scabbard. You can just hold off for wind adjustment with the proper reticle.

They come in both FFP and SFP your choice. The FFP's with the XLR reticle are not out yet but received a email saying they would be available 4-6 weeks. I think it's the perfect scope for the way I hunt and will get one when available. This will be my first FFP scope so I can't recommend to you which is best.

Here's a link
Vortex Optics - Viper HS Riflescopes
I agree, that is going to be a nice scope. I however can't for the life of me figure out why they went with 1/2 MOA turrets for a LR rig.

Scot E.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-13-2012, 05:37 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Central Idaho
Posts: 1,136
Re: FFP or SFP Please vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scot E View Post
I agree, that is going to be a nice scope. I however can't for the life of me figure out why they went with 1/2 MOA turrets for a LR rig.

Scot E.

Yeah the 1/2 MOA thing bugged the crap out of me to start but the more I thought about it the less it mattered. At a thousand yards you're talking 5 inches +-. A bull elk has a 10 inch kill zone so with accurate shot placement you're in it. I use a 06 for elk and deer hunting and have a self imposed limit on deer of 700 yards so the possible 3.5 inch error really does not matter to me.

I don't know what the engineering crew at Vortex were after but if it was designed specifically for the hunter I think they got it right....will see!


I think beyond a 1000 yards for a hunting scope there are better choices.
__________________
Jim



There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man. Sir Winston Churchill.

Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom. Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-13-2012, 05:53 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,935
Re: FFP or SFP Please vote

I have used scopes with .5 moa turrets. They are quick to dial and typically have more MOA per revolution . I like them within their limits and I too would agree for me that would be 700 yards before you would start to suffer shot placement. This is just another thing that is dependent on the max distance you will be shooting. For that antelope I took a few weeks back at 1285 yards I would not have wanted .5 moa turrets or a FFP. Take a FFP and try putting the crosshairs on that corner of white behind the shoulder at 1300 yards, then do it again with a fine crosshair SFP. It does make a difference and the farther you go out the more it will come into play. Like Scott has said before, he prefers the SFP for varmints. His reason is the same I prefer SFP for all long range shots. Precise placement.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-13-2012, 06:27 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SW Montana
Posts: 4,551
Re: FFP or SFP Please vote

Second focal all the way, with a FFP on low power in low light I have to turn on the reticle light to find it then during good light and I want turn up the magnification the reticle is thick compared to what I want it to be, FFP is completely backward for the me in a hunting situation.
I've also found with holding over or holding of with windage the SFP is much more versatile if you do a little research, my scope right now has the substentions marked on the power ring so I can look at what I need to hold over and if I'm not on a hash mark I can turn it down till it matches very close and let it have it. I can also get more direct hold point if I us two different powers.

I really dig my Vortex HS LR, with my 270 WSM at 7000ft elevation I'm one turn to 1100 yards and I can reach 2000 yards dialing but you have to start being aware of needing to adjust your hold just a bit at some point. For a hunting optic for the average hunter who has extended his hunting range out to 800-1000 yards max it seems ideal to me!
__________________
High Fence, Low Fence, Stuck in the Fence, if I can Tag it and Eat it, it's Hunting!

"Pain is weakness leaving your body"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-14-2012, 11:16 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Central Idaho
Posts: 1,136
Re: FFP or SFP Please vote

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigngreen View Post
Second focal all the way, with a FFP on low power in low light I have to turn on the reticle light to find it then during good light and I want turn up the magnification the reticle is thick compared to what I want it to be, FFP is completely backward for the me in a hunting situation.
I've also found with holding over or holding of with windage the SFP is much more versatile if you do a little research, my scope right now has the substentions marked on the power ring so I can look at what I need to hold over and if I'm not on a hash mark I can turn it down till it matches very close and let it have it. I can also get more direct hold point if I us two different powers.

I really dig my Vortex HS LR, with my 270 WSM at 7000ft elevation I'm one turn to 1100 yards and I can reach 2000 yards dialing but you have to start being aware of needing to adjust your hold just a bit at some point. For a hunting optic for the average hunter who has extended his hunting range out to 800-1000 yards max it seems ideal to me!

I apologize to the OP for kinda high jacking this thread but he may find this stuff of interest also.

OK had a email conversation with Vortex about the thickness of the cross hair used in the HS-LR FFP XTR reticle and how thick it would be on 16 power and how much of the target it would cover at a 1000 yards.

The cross hair is .15 MOA at 100 yards so at 1000 yards it would cover 1.5708 inches of a target. These are Vortex's numbers. On deer and elk size targets I can't see a problem. If you were shooting paper and wanted a consistent hold it would be too heavy.

bigngreen in your opinion as you have the HS and have looked through the FFP scope is the cross hair to "thin" on the low powers? It would be somewhere between a 1/8" and 3/16" at 100 yards. Or is it just hard to see?
__________________
Jim



There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man. Sir Winston Churchill.

Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom. Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-14-2012, 03:38 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 4422′44″N 1082′35″W
Posts: 4,035
Re: FFP or SFP Please vote

i like the advantages of SFP but in a lot of circumstances ffp would be great. my use with ffp is limited but for the added cost of ffp im sticking with sfp. its good stuff
__________________
Mike

Get a JOB! I already feed the bears, I dont need to feed you too!

" Real elk guns start with the number 3 or bigger and blow two holes, one in and one out." - My Dad
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: FFP or SFP Please vote
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
get out there and vote! Trickymissfit Reloading 1 11-02-2010 12:04 PM
Vote 2nd A Olio Tutto General Discussion 2 07-20-2009 12:25 PM
Help Please Vote !!!!!!!!!!! BigDaddy0381 General Discussion 22 02-25-2009 02:03 PM
Vote for trapping! Huntinfool General Discussion 9 04-25-2006 09:20 PM
VOTE george General Discussion 2 10-28-2004 09:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC