Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Farrell Bases- What good are they?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2004, 07:42 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 60
Farrell Bases- What good are they?

I am real frustrated now. I did not know, being a newbie that the Farrel base was so dang high! It simply will not work with my 40mm leupold Mark 4 scope, arggggg Too dang high and no options to correct it.

So where or when do Farrell bases shine? When mounting 56 mm objective lens night force scopes?
__________________
500 x GPM x TD = BTUH
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2004, 10:02 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,418
Re: Farrell Bases- What good are they?

I use the same set up. A 40mm mark 4 with KF base.

What kind of rings are you using?? It sounds like your rings might be too high. A short to medium high ring should be good for that set up. I am using Leupold QR medium rings. Those work real nice with that base. Maybe try using shorter rings. That base isnt that high.

[ 06-10-2004: Message edited by: meichele ]
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broz View Post
Please just answer one very simple question. Why would anyone shooting long range load a low BC , low SD 168 gr offering in a 300 win???????

My answer to this is. The only reason is to make the 7 RM look good. There is no other reason.

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2004, 03:34 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Woodbine, MD
Posts: 34
Re: Farrell Bases- What good are they?

I kinda like the Farrel. I am using the Farrel base, with standard Farrel rings, and a 40mm obj. scope. I have just enough clearance for the Butler Creek scope caps to clear the barrel nicely.

I like the fact that the Farrel base is a little higher, as it makes it easier to load the cartridges into the magazine (I am shooting .300WM, more clearance for the fat cartridges)

Also, the slots for the rings are only at the ends, where you need them, not above the loading port. One less thing to bust your thumb on. (not that I have girly little thumbs or anything) Actually, I have big, fat, thumbs- maybe that's why I appreciate the extra clearance.

Shorter rings will probably correct your issue, but I know 150 bucks a set is steep.

I have seen ads from time to time, from folks in similar situations, wanting to trade Mediums for Lows, Lows for Highs, etc

Might be worth a look at the classifieds on this board and others.

marc
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2004, 02:40 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jamestown, North Dakota
Posts: 69
Re: Farrell Bases- What good are they?

Dixie,

Check intothe Tactical Precision Systems TSR-W low rings. http://www.tacticalprecision.com/TSR%20W-Series.htm

They are very tough, cost around $75 , cheaper if you can get the discount at Brownells, they look good and work great, should get your scope low enough. I have a set of these on a 20-MOA Farrell baseusing a Sightron 4x16x42AO, and a set of Farrell standard rings on a 0-MOA Farrell base using a 3x9x40 Leupold Tactical. In one of your other posts I think you refered to there being a 3/8" gap between scope and barrel, I just don't see that as excessive, maybe it's just me. I want a good solid strong mount and I do not care so much about how much gap there is between the scope and barrel. As far as the cheek weld, most of the shooters I know have had to go to an adjustable cheekpiece or get some sort of stock pack and put a piece of foam in there to get to the right height.

Farrell 20-MOA base, TSR-W low rings, Sightron 4x16x42AO


Farrell 0-MOA base, Farrell standard rings, Leupold 3x9x40 Tactical


Hope this helps.

huntin1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-2004, 02:50 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 60
Re: Farrell Bases- What good are they?

Hey Michael...

Do you think you could measure the clearance of your objective from barrel? Are you using a varmint barrel?

Thanks so much for the help!
__________________
500 x GPM x TD = BTUH
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-11-2004, 02:51 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 60
Re: Farrell Bases- What good are they?

Huntin 1

Thanks for the link, I did not know those folks existed!
__________________
500 x GPM x TD = BTUH
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-11-2004, 02:54 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 60
Re: Farrell Bases- What good are they?

Mark357

Are you using a 30mm tube scope on your rifle?

I can get lower rings for a 1" scope but not for the 30mm, nonetheless I have some PRW loopies coming in the mail and I already have the farrel 20moa base.

Perhaps I will screw it together and see. Maybe I was misled!

Thanks very much for the replies, one and all.
__________________
500 x GPM x TD = BTUH
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Farrell Bases- What good are they?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ken Farrell Bases TallSDYoteHunter Optics For Sale 0 03-16-2011 01:27 PM
ken farrell bases??? and how many moa?? yzm19 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 5 01-14-2008 10:21 AM
Ken Farrell Bases Brent Equipment Discussions 1 04-11-2004 09:44 PM
Ken Farrell Bases Brent Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 2 03-19-2004 01:35 PM
Ken Farrell bases,do you bed? jacack Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 8 09-25-2003 06:56 AM

Current Poll
Have You Ever Backpack Hunted?
YES - 62.16%
966 Votes
NO - 37.84%
588 Votes
Total Votes: 1,554
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC