Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Comparing Rangefinding scopes

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 11-28-2012, 10:08 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
Re: Comparing Rangefinding scopes

Thanks for the information guys and keep it coming !
Thanks
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-29-2012, 12:34 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 100
Re: Comparing Rangefinding scopes

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcraig View Post
Thanks for the information guys and keep it coming !
Thanks
Craig

IMHO, if you are wanting to shoot long range you should be capable of several things:

1) reloading -- seldom can factory rounds delivery the precise accurary that long range shooting demands

2) brains -- there is more than just trajectory to precise long distance shooting. Wind, angle, temp and pressure play a role.

3) brains-- NONE of the current scopes, rangefinders, binos, etc that attempt to do bullet compensation allow for complete date entry of the bullet, its BC, MV, etc. They rely on proscribed tranjectories. They lack the computing power to actually take the aformentioned data elements and transcrible them into REAL predictions.

4) money -- a very good rangefinder, will give you the angle, distance, pressure etc. You need to add -- guess what -- brains to memorize tables and figures to interpret those numbers.

Sorry to sound negative.... I've recently worked with several products that attempt to predict hold over or correction. You cannot just plug in distance and get an answer.

Until the scopes, rangefinders and binos that say they can correct for distance etc actually allow entry of ALL the meaningfull data, then I say avoid them.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-29-2012, 07:22 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 427
Re: Comparing Rangefinding scopes

I don't want one to do all the work for me. I want one so that I know how far something is exactly before I shoot. I know my weapon and how to shoot it out to 500 pretty easy. What I have a hard time with is saying that bull is at 550 or 700? WHere I hunt, I very seldom have time to get out a rangefinder then set up for a shot. This way I can aim and range at the same time. If it comes back too far out and I need to regroup then it keeps me from taking a shot that I might have before.
__________________
Never pass up a kool-aid stand or lemonade stand. Remember it is a young American learning the American dream.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:34 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
Re: Comparing Rangefinding scopes

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdherman View Post
IMHO, if you are wanting to shoot long range you should be capable of several things:

1) reloading -- seldom can factory rounds delivery the precise accurary that long range shooting demands

2) brains -- there is more than just trajectory to precise long distance shooting. Wind, angle, temp and pressure play a role.

3) brains-- NONE of the current scopes, rangefinders, binos, etc that attempt to do bullet compensation allow for complete date entry of the bullet, its BC, MV, etc. They rely on proscribed tranjectories. They lack the computing power to actually take the aformentioned data elements and transcrible them into REAL predictions.

4) money -- a very good rangefinder, will give you the angle, distance, pressure etc. You need to add -- guess what -- brains to memorize tables and figures to interpret those numbers.

Sorry to sound negative.... I've recently worked with several products that attempt to predict hold over or correction. You cannot just plug in distance and get an answer.

Until the scopes, rangefinders and binos that say they can correct for distance etc actually allow entry of ALL the meaningfull data, then I say avoid them.
Thank you for your input.
1)Reloading-I have reloaded for over 40 years just choose not to anymore. I really dont enjoy it .I have found factory ammo has improved so much through the years that finding a factory load that will produce 1/2 to 1 inch groups at a hundred in an accurate rifle is not really a huge issue.
2)Brains-well you may have a point there !LOL
Seriously I do recognize that other factors play a role in the equation.
3)Brains- read above !
Seriously I am aware that the Rangefinding scopes are not a panacea for being able to use data and compute the proper way to use it. heck I have been processing data for my 53 years and sometimes my computer (Brain) comes up with either an incomplete or an incorrest answer ! BUT it still helps and I think the rangefinding scope will do the same and that is help.
I do think that I read the Burris III do take into account BC and shot angle.
4)money-Who has enough !My buisness plan didn,t work as I did not win the lottery !
I am going to have to really think on it but I may(or not !)Have brains enough to do some memorizing and interpretation of data.
Yes you do come off sounding negative BUT that is great as well, as I dont just want oppinions of people who all say the same thing .I want to see opposing views as well so I can use my brain to interpret the data and help me to come to a logical and rational decision whether to buy a rangefinding scope or not.
I appreciate the fact that you have worked with several products that attempt to predict holdover and correction as I can glean from your tests and observation which is exactly why I posted the question. Which of these products have you worked with? The Burris Eliminator,Burris Eliminator II, The Burris eliminator III,the Bushnell Yardage pro etc. I would really like to know how they compare to each other.In your field testing experience can you tell me which one of them you like the best and why or why not .
I am new to this site but see that there are field test and articles written here by members .Do you have information or an article here I can read? Reason I ask is as I said I am new here and have not had a chance to see and read all of them yet,and I want all the info I can learn from BEFORE I spend my hard earned money.They sure are proud of them !!
Thanks again ,
Regards
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:38 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
Re: Comparing Rangefinding scopes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sako7STW View Post
I don't want one to do all the work for me. I want one so that I know how far something is exactly before I shoot. I know my weapon and how to shoot it out to 500 pretty easy. What I have a hard time with is saying that bull is at 550 or 700? WHere I hunt, I very seldom have time to get out a rangefinder then set up for a shot. This way I can aim and range at the same time. If it comes back too far out and I need to regroup then it keeps me from taking a shot that I might have before.
Exactamundo
I concur completly!
One less thing to carry in the field as well.
Regards
Craig
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Comparing Rangefinding scopes
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bullet Comparing and Sorting 22 308 Target Shooter Reloading 0 05-28-2012 11:16 AM
comparing the giants rem Long Range Hunting & Shooting 17 04-06-2011 11:05 PM
Do any of you use a GPS for rangefinding? KQguy Long Range Hunting & Shooting 20 04-09-2009 12:43 AM
Comparing Ballistic programs??? CatShooter Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 12-13-2006 07:16 PM
WTS Shepard Rangefinding Scopes Stokes Guns For Sale 1 05-22-2003 10:25 AM

Current Poll
Do you watch outdoor shows live or by recording them?
Always recorded - 13.30%
110 Votes
Mostly recorded - 24.18%
200 Votes
Sometimes recorded - 14.51%
120 Votes
Rarely or never recorded - 48.00%
397 Votes
Total Votes: 827
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC