Re: Burris 8x32 bmd
There really are 2 ways to do it. The best way is to go out and measure the reticle as accurately as possible from the bench @ the higher magnification (including the windage mil-dot subtension). With 32X this should be easy. Once u calculate the dot to dot subtension of the mil-dots the diameters of the dots should be easy. They should be .2 of whatever the dot to dot subtension is @ 32X IF the dot diameters r .2 mil. at 14X. I think they r, but don't know for sure.
The other way to do it is to apply an inversely proportional equation to calculate it since as magnification INCREASES, reticle subtension DECREASES, and it's supposed to be linear, but that is dependent upon the power ring being calibrated properly-- something i don't trust most of the time.
I think u r on the right track here by doing a recalibration as i never understood why Burris didn't calibrate the reticle for the highest magnification. I mean, why buy a 32X scope with a ballistic reticle that's calibrated for an intermediate magnification??
Something to think about tho. with the recalibration is now u're only going to get a little more than about 6 inch per hundred yds. (IPHY) reticle compensation to the lower post since 14X is about 40% of 32X, and therefore 6 IPHY is 40% of 14.5 IPHY (the subtension of the lower post tip @ 14X). That's not much really, but u could certainly add clicks beyond the lower post tip if u wanted to go out farther.