Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Best Rangefinder

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 07-31-2012, 06:27 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,278
Re: Best Rangefinder

Another vote for the Gunwerks g7 BR2. Pricey, and perhaps more capability than you are looking for. My experience is that it is an excellent product, and well worth every penny!!!! Check out Len's review on this site.
__________________

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready"-T. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:41 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 24
Re: Best Rangefinder

the leica and swaro's and zeiss don't have an inclinometer do they? how much is len selling the gunwerks for?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:53 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 121
Re: Best Rangefinder

The G7 reads to 2,000 yards.......only gives ballistic solutions to 1400 yards.

I love mine......it works fantastic.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-01-2012, 10:21 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 419
Re: Best Rangefinder

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broz View Post
Definatly not in that order...

Jeff
Out of curiosity, what order would you put them in? I'm getting ready to buy a new one too and looking for about the same as the OP.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-01-2012, 10:31 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 284
Re: Best Rangefinder

1==g7
2==swarovski
3==zeiss
4==leica
for me no.3 and 4 could go either way. I personally sold
the zeiss and leica but still have the g7 and swarovski.
as always it is personal preference.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:00 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,817
Re: Best Rangefinder

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nimrod View Post
Out of curiosity, what order would you put them in? I'm getting ready to buy a new one too and looking for about the same as the OP.

Bob
Hi Bob, I have owned a few of the Swaro's (5) and Leica's (4) and tested the Zeiss. Here is how I rate them.

For distance on any rock bluff or tree in low light.

Leica and Swaro are about the same averaging in the 1800 yard range. Again this is in perfect condiions and large objects. Owning 5 of them I can tell you the swaros are not all the same and a good one will go 1900 plus a little. Again in low evening light and a huge flat surface.

The Zeiss will follow them in the absolute distance test coming in about 1500 tops.

For precision, pertaining to hitting small precise objects, on flat ground and in ground clutter like sage brush or going into the edge of a timber on a standing bull and not grabbing a closer object or trees behind resulting in a mis range.

Leica ( bay far)

Followed by Swaro and then Zeiss.

This is directly related to the beam divergence ( beam size) of these units. Large beams will return reading easier and this will fool many users. The smaller beam units like the Leica require a solid rest but will be most likely to be hitting the object you are trying to range. The farther the distance the more this prevails and also the more a mis-range will screw you up.

Reticle size for a precision hold on the target.

Leica , hands down.

Ease in seeing the reticle, Leica again.

Shape , the Zeiss and Swaro are flat bottom units and easier to rest solid, so I will give them this one.

Size and weight. Leica is smallest and easily fits in a pocket.

Glass, all 3 are very good. plenty good for their magnification.

Magnification. The Swaro wins by 1x. But I don't see this as a deciding factor for me.

Adding all this up. It is the Leica 1600 for me in the under $1000 arena. and the Leica is a bargin at $750.

I recently got my hands on a G7-BR2 and am testing it now. When done I will report on it. So far the ballisics program in running right on with shooter and my proven drops. But I haven't yet set it up to fail due to its large beam, so that remains to be seen. So far I reall like it for ease and speed under 1000 yards. But I want to look at every aspect before I make a final evaluation. Also, I rate this unit in the next class up due to the over $1500 price tag. So it falls into the competition of the Vectronix Terripin. I am testing it against my Vectronix PLRF10 for accuacy, along with provind data on targets I am sure I know the exact distance of. These tests also include actual game animals in all conditions and terrain.

So the short answer of the 3 under 1K.

Leica 1600 CRF
Swaro Laserguide
Zeiss

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:23 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 419
Re: Best Rangefinder

Thanks Jeff!

Don't know about the OP but that helps me a bunch!

Bob
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Best Rangefinder
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G7 BR2 Rangefinder COBrad Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 1 12-04-2011 03:47 PM
G7 BR2 (Ballistic Rangefinder 2000) rangefinder video intro Len Backus Long Range Pursuit TV, Gunwerks, GSeven 40 11-14-2011 01:48 PM
Need a Rangefinder jpbaker Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 10 02-25-2011 08:02 AM
Rangefinder brokenharley711 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 25 06-18-2010 12:44 PM
Newer Swaro rangefinder vs. older Swaro rangefinder goodgrouper Equipment Discussions 10 08-02-2006 11:09 AM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.04%
66 Votes
NO - 51.46%
106 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.50%
34 Votes
Total Votes: 206
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC