close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics

Reply

B&C vs. BDC

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 04-02-2006, 09:04 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9
B&C vs. BDC

Advice appreciated. I'm going to purchase a VX-III for the 300. I cannot decide on a 3.5 X 10 with the B&C reticle or the 4.5 X 14 and a custom target turret. Rifle is primarily an elk rifle. Shooting 200 grain ABs at 2875 fps. 500 yards is a very long shot for me (Been blowing up milk jugs a 400 consistenly with this rifle).

I decided against the 4.5 X 14 with the B&C reticle because I don't want to limit myself to a 14X scope in order to use the reticle. FOV is too tight. The ability to aim dead on at longer ranges as well as dial in to the exact yardage is attractive. Then again, the built in hold-over offered by the B&C reticle is dead on for my load according to the charts and my shooting. What to do????
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 04-02-2006, 09:49 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2006
    Location: Nottingham, UK
    Posts: 261
    Re: B&C vs. BDC

    [ QUOTE ]
    Advice appreciated. I'm going to purchase a VX-III for the 300. I cannot decide on a 3.5 X 10 with the B&C reticle or the 4.5 X 14 and a custom target turret. Rifle is primarily an elk rifle. Shooting 200 grain ABs at 2875 fps. 500 yards is a very long shot for me (Been blowing up milk jugs a 400 consistenly with this rifle).

    I decided against the 4.5 X 14 with the B&C reticle because I don't want to limit myself to a 14X scope in order to use the reticle. FOV is too tight. The ability to aim dead on at longer ranges as well as dial in to the exact yardage is attractive. Then again, the built in hold-over offered by the B&C reticle is dead on for my load according to the charts and my shooting. What to do????

    [/ QUOTE ]

    i have been rolling this one around in my head for some time now,and have come to the conclusion that it is better to dial in the range,than use a ret,as the ret will only be spot on the mark at given rangers (IE, if the beast is between the dots,and you have to hold between them.)but if you need to make a quick follow up shot,then the ret is better (as you can use it quicker )
    but i am sure that someone better experienced will give a lot better explanation.

    thats how i now see it.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 04-02-2006, 02:17 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2005
    Location: USA
    Posts: 2,598
    Re: B&C vs. BDC


    BDC reticles are only on with one load and altitude as altitude changes so does trajectory.The NP-R2 Nightforce reticle is marked into 2 MOA incrementsand and works well with minimal dialing of course the milldot also works well for those that understand it. If you get a BDC or B&C reticle as you progress and shoot farther you will find them lacking
    __________________
    range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 04-04-2006, 10:00 PM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: Western MI
    Posts: 718
    Re: B&C vs. BDC

    Pre-64,

    I went through the same and settled on the Mark 4 4.5x14PR along with the RX-IV range finder.There are several ballistic programs available. Just plug in your data and you can create you own drop chart. The B&C reticle is nice but you will have more flexability by dialing in your distances.
    Another option would be to get the B&C reticle and have dials installed. Now you have more decisions! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

    JD338
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 04-05-2006, 06:13 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2003
    Location: Pueblo, CO
    Posts: 1,238
    Re: B&C vs. BDC

    I'd get the B&C + tgt. elevation turret. Then u can apply both if u wish, and just use the plex post tip for windage (@ 2.6 MOA) when dialing elevation. I like ballistic reticles, but then i'm the type that believes a ranging reticle is also a ballistic reticle and vice versa.
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 04-05-2006, 06:49 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2001
    Location: Potomac River
    Posts: 5,071
    Re: B&C vs. BDC

    For a beginner trying to stretch out to 500 yds the B&C (or any other BDC) is good and easy. When the day comes that you want to shoot over to the next ridgeline at 700 yds or so, you will need dial up knobs.
    __________________
    The Smokin Fur Rifle Club
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 04-05-2006, 07:27 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Sep 2004
    Location: on the rifle range in Utah
    Posts: 2,704
    Re: B&C vs. BDC

    I prefer neither because they are both just "ball park" methods. Learn to dial a turret using MOA and you'll be far ahead of the game and much more precise. JMHO.
    __________________
    Find it
    Range it
    Click it
    Pull it
    Dump it

    If it's not far, it's boring.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC