Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2009, 11:01 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 193
50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

Can someone outline for me the advantages/disadvantages when deciding between objective lens diameter?

As far as I can tell the main advantage of 50mm is light transmission, with the main disadvantage being size/weight/cost.

What other important considerations are there?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2009, 01:26 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,093
Re: 50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

If given the choice between a 40 and a 50 I'd always go for the 50 for the reason you stated.

The 50 compared to the 40/42/44 seems to not be much more bulky feeling.

The jump to 56 mm appears to cross the bulky bump into stuff barrier....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2009, 01:38 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,390
Re: 50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

Agree. I would go with the 50mm too. You'll have a larger exit pupil of light which can make it a little easier for your eye to catch the field of view. 56mm just seems to bulky to me - my opinion. If weight is a primary concern, the larger objectives will also add a couple oz in weight.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2009, 08:41 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 79
Re: 50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

I went through this same process this last spring. What I found, for me, is that all this book theoretical data is enjoyable to read...but left me overthinking the process. Light transmission, clarity, parallax, bullet compensation, etc...

The one overriding thing that made me decide upon my 40mm instead of a 50mm was Fit...Cheek weld and eye relief. Two things that are not often discussed when speaking of the technical merits of a scope.

Now that I am getting into MOA adjustments, instead of windage holdover, My perfect scope would be a Swarovski, fine crosshair, 40mm. Recticle is in the first optical plane, means that rectile placement on the target does not change with different power settings. It is really good glass. Fine crosshairs do not mask as much of the target at longer distances.

For a field report: I did side by side comparison between a Leupold VX-II 50mm and my VX-III 40mm after sunset. Astounding, my VX-III 40mm was more clear, brighter and showed better color than the 50mm....I did not have my light meter with me, but It seemed 30% better on all counts to me - and my friends.

I think glass quality is paramount. No book I ever read said that a 40mm could out perform a 50mm.

Get the best quality glass you can afford, and make sure of the fit.

Perhaps a local shop would let you place a few 40s and 50s on your rifle and see what fits you best.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-27-2009, 05:32 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,390
Re: 50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nvhunter View Post
For a field report: I did side by side comparison between a Leupold VX-II 50mm and my VX-III 40mm after sunset. Astounding, my VX-III 40mm was more clear, brighter and showed better color than the 50mm....I did not have my light meter with me, but It seemed 30% better on all counts to me - and my friends.

I think glass quality is paramount. No book I ever read said that a 40mm could out perform a 50mm.
No one said the quality of the glass wasn't important. Or that Swaro glass isn't better than Tasco. Once the price and glass quality of scope has been selected, a 50mm will have some benefits over a 40mm, without a huge increase in price.

You're right, if a 50mm won't let you rest your cheek on your stock but a 40mm will, due to the lower mount on the receiver, a person ought to go with the 40mm. A 50mm will require the scope to be mounted a minimum 0.2" higher for the objective bell to clear the barrel. I've not had problems with 50mm objectives so far. Doesn't mean it isn't a valid consideration though.

I agree the quality of the glass and the glass coatings is one of the most important decisions in a scope purchase. Right up there with the mechanical reliability of the scope and turrets, and hardiness of the scope to withstand recoil without busting a gut.

But once the scope manufacturer and grade of scope has been selected, I'd recommend 50 over 40. The quality of the glass should be identical and the exit pupil will be 20% larger on the 50mm than on the 40mm. And 50mm are generally funtional for the average shooter with respect to planting the cheek on the stock. That's what I thought the question was (40 vs 50mm objectives - all other components being equal) and that's what my response addressed.

There is no one-size-fits-all answer. It would be best to be able to compare the scopes on one's rifle, but that can get pretty expensive. Thus this Forum and a collection of opinions to help with the 'better' selection on the first purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2009, 06:46 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 79
Re: 50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

I agree. All things being equal 50 will gather more light than 40. What I have found, is that I have to find the equipment not that is best, but that is best for me.

I placed Near.mfg 20 MOA scope rail and alpha rings with a VX-III 40mm on my Sako 75 7MM STW. (shots like a dream - Knocking out bullseyes at 500 yds)...Anyway, my cheek weld is too high. I'll need a comb elevator. For my purpose a 50 would really be too high.

There is a Bass Pro near here. These guys will let you bring in your rifle and try different scopes. I bet cabellas, gander mountain, etc are normally just as friendly..if you have one within driving distance.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2009, 07:39 PM
mo mo is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mississippi
Posts: 432
Re: 50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-

I agree that 50 mm gathers more light vs the 40mm. The question is does your eyes know the difference? Mine do not as long as both have quality glass. If your eyes can tell the difference then you need to buy the 50mm.

Last edited by mo; 09-27-2009 at 07:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 50mm vs 40mm Objective +/-
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50mm or 56mm objective? McDewbie Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 7 06-25-2011 11:42 PM
40mm or 50mm objective cornchuck Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 4 10-12-2010 12:34 PM
Why a 50mm objective ? POP Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 8 01-14-2007 09:49 AM
40mm or 50mm Objective Airborne Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 25 06-22-2004 04:54 AM
40mm, 42mm, 44mm & 50mm Objective - Optical Question of the Year Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 13 06-17-2004 07:23 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.30%
73 Votes
NO - 50.88%
115 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.81%
38 Votes
Total Votes: 226
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC