Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2011, 09:14 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: East Texas
Posts: 16
30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

What are the pros and cons of each and your opinions?
__________________
Free Men Own Guns, Slaves Don't!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2011, 09:22 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 554
Re: 30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

30mm
pro: More elevation and windage travel. More light transmission.
Con: weight

1"
Pro: weight
Con: Elevation and windage travel.
__________________
"I'm interested in rifles, but only accurate rifles are interesting". Col. Townsend Whelen
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2011, 08:37 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rapid City, South dakota
Posts: 410
Re: 30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

The only real difference between the two is the number of clicks that the erector set allows you. And the fact that the 30MM tube is a bit stiffer maybe. As far as transmitting more light the answer to that one is NO. Sorry Camshaft, didn't mean to step on your toes on that one but its the truth. Some company's out there say it does but if you do some real studying on it you will find out tube size has nothing to do with light transmission.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2011, 11:43 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO. USA
Posts: 248
Re: 30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camshaft View Post
30mm
pro: More elevation and windage travel. More light transmission.
Con: weight

1"
Pro: weight
Con: Elevation and windage travel.
Jeez, that looks like my dad's rifle. I thought it got stolen for a sec.

Hicks
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2011, 03:12 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 372
Re: 30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camshaft View Post
30mm
pro: More elevation and windage travel. More light transmission.
Con: weight

1"
Pro: weight
Con: Elevation and windage travel.

Pretty much it. THough I will say what you gain in the 30mm in pros, far outweighs the cons.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2011, 03:15 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 372
Re: 30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillR View Post
The only real difference between the two is the number of clicks that the erector set allows you. And the fact that the 30MM tube is a bit stiffer maybe. As far as transmitting more light the answer to that one is NO. Sorry Camshaft, didn't mean to step on your toes on that one but its the truth. Some company's out there say it does but if you do some real studying on it you will find out tube size has nothing to do with light transmission.

Could you cite those companies please? I have heard people claim that, but not companies. I could be wrong, but I think that is more important for transmitting light than objective size is. Might explain why there are so many crappy scope companies out there too.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2011, 08:37 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rapid City, South dakota
Posts: 410
Re: 30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?

Not going to name any company's that claim that it does as that isn't hard to find out by reading but I have to study every bit of the spec's on scopes for a living so I can advise people. I try to keep my business life separate from my online life so I will leave it at that. :-)
The reason that a lot of company's are going to the larger tube is so they can get more elevation in them as Long Range Shooters are demanding it and demand is what drives the market or we would still be using mostly 1" scopes.
Two things will improve light transference. One is the size of the objective bell and the lenses in that area has the major part in light transference.
The next part that contributes to light transference is the lenses coatings and whether their coated inside and out or just one side. This is also a lot/some of the difference between cheaper scopes and higher priced scopes.
Also some eyes as they get older (mine ) cannot see more light than some of the smaller objective bells can give you. I have a hard time telling the difference between a 50 and a 56MM and always figured it was imagined as without knowing which is which I cannot tell.
Now all that said a 1" can be just as bright as a 30 or even a 34MM tube depending on the size of the bell and coatings. OH and the quality of the scopes glass too.
Another thing I see that really blows my mind is some scope company's really blow their numbers on light transference way over what it actually is. Sit down sometime and start reading the actual spec's on a scope. Once you understand them it will start to open your eyes a bit so to speak.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 30mm vs 1" tube....what the deal?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Leupold VX-III "Tactical", 4.5-14x50, 30mm tube buckbrush Optics For Sale 3 12-02-2010 08:21 PM
ACI Mount for 1" Tube? Can only find 30mm... drenge Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 4 04-11-2008 12:35 AM
Great deal on Leupold Mark 4 LRT M1 Scope 30mm Tube 6.5-20x 50mm dwm Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 8 09-03-2004 11:47 PM
1" tube or 30MM Iron Worker Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 16 08-25-2004 09:58 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC