close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics

Reply

1" or 30mm performance difference

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Unread 08-05-2009, 11:19 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,000
Re: 1" or 30mm performance difference

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nvhunter View Post
Is there a difference in performance between a 1" or 30mm scope tube?

1" = 25.4 mm
The 30mm tubs have some advantages over the 1" tubes.

They are stronger due to the diameter of the tube, the lenses inside the tube are larger and
thicker allowing the scopes to be shorter. (Look at the same brand and power and you will
see that they are shorter),

Also as mentioned they can have more turret travel (More MOA).

The objective and ocular lenses are the same size.

J E CUSTOM
__________________
"PRESS ON"
Reply With Quote
  •   #9  
    Unread 08-05-2009, 11:59 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Sep 2005
    Location: Central AZ
    Posts: 1,140
    Re: 1" or 30mm performance difference

    I also believe another advantage of the 30mm tube is more light transmission to the ocular piece. The 30mm tube was popular in Europe for many years before finding its way to North America. In Europe, their hunting culture provides for ethical hunting and shooting well before sunrise and well after sunset. Their larger objective scopes allow them to gather more light and the 30mm tube allows them to transmit that light to their eye.
    Reply With Quote

      #10  
    Unread 08-06-2009, 11:30 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Location: Valley County, ID
    Posts: 308
    Re: 1" or 30mm performance difference

    Not trying to start an arguement, but I researched this topic heavily just a few months ago. Yes, typically larger tubes are stonger, but in the case of a scope the difference between 1" and 30 mm is so small that it should not be a decision maker. 30mm tubes, at least Leupold's, use the same internal glass as the 1" tubes. If they used 30mm glass, the would not be able to achieve the extra wind and elev adjustments that make 30mm tubes so poular. Therefor, two identical objective scopes, one 30mm and one 1", have the same light transmission. Where you pick up the better light transmission is through the objective, which is why scopes have evolved from 29-36mm objectives to 40-56 objective.


    Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying don't buy a 30mm, I have several and I like them, just buy them for the right reason...increased range of adjustment
    Reply With Quote
      #11  
    Unread 08-08-2009, 10:45 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2007
    Location: Olympia Washington
    Posts: 103
    Re: 1" or 30mm performance difference

    I recently compared some scopes side by side i.e. 1" to 30mm, same power and objective size, same maunfacturer. Some brands showed a noticeable difference with the 30mm being brighter to my eyes. Some didn't. I suspect that some manufacturers put better lenses or better coatings in the 30mm scopes because they can sell them for more. In plainer words, their 30mm scopes are their higher end scopes. What have you guy's noticed? Also, I will respectfully disagree with fireroad> I am not an engineer, ( maybe one will chime in ) but disagree on the strength issue on this basses...In archery, the arrows are tested and classified by spline, the given amount of deflection of the tube. You can have two arrows with the same deflection rate but different diameters and wall thicknesses. This is done so that you can go to a lighter weight arrow by going to a larger diameter shaft with a thinner wall and still maintain the same strenght/spline classification. If it is significant in an arrow sized tube, why wouldn't it be significant in a larger tube with the same wall thickness, the 30mm tube compared to the 1" tube. The only way that it wouldn't be significantly stronger is if they used a thinner wall.

    Last edited by dewiseman; 08-08-2009 at 11:12 AM. Reason: added comments
    Reply With Quote
      #12  
    Unread 08-08-2009, 11:25 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Location: Valley County, ID
    Posts: 308
    Re: 1" or 30mm performance difference

    dewiseman - You are correct...I believe another OP hit the nail on the head by comparing the tubes to bike frames. For the same weight, a larger thinner walled tube is stronger than a thicker walled smaller diameter tube. My point was that some people purchase a 30mm tube soley because they believe it is stronger when in reality 1. a 1" tube on a good scope is plenty strong enough and 2. the reason behind the 30mm tube design was increased range in adjustments. I would fell bad if somone paid the extra money for a 30mm tube because they thought they needed it for strength alone.
    Reply With Quote
      #13  
    Unread 08-10-2009, 03:09 PM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2004
    Location: Wyoming
    Posts: 82
    Re: 1" or 30mm performance difference

    The advantage, with the Leupold, in the 30mm tube over the 1 inch tube is the side focus. The 30mm has side focus and the 1 inch does not.

    I think it is a big difference in the overall utility of the optic in hunting situations.

    As stated above the lenses in the Leupold are the same in the 1 inch and 30mm so no difference in resolution given the same objective dia.
    __________________
    John Burns
    www.greybullprecision.com
    Reply With Quote
      #14  
    Unread 08-10-2009, 05:32 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2001
    Location: Long Island, New York
    Posts: 2,457
    Re: 1" or 30mm performance difference

    Use this link to see what really happens to your scope tube and mount under fire. We may not all be shooting a 50BMG but most of us don't use a scope or mounts built this heavy either.
    YouTube - high-speed video of scope and barrel flexing on a 50BMG
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: 1" or 30mm performance difference
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    real performance difference between 178 and 208 amax backyardsniper Long Range Hunting & Shooting 2 06-28-2011 12:25 PM
    18" vs 20" barrel difference ??? Alfred Crouch AR15/10 Rifles 5 04-28-2011 11:27 AM
    .204 "long" range performance JF7mmRUM Long Range Hunting & Shooting 7 01-31-2011 09:56 PM
    WTS *NEW* US Optics rings Mounts 88" Height 3/4" thick 30mm P6M-3000-XL PK_IN_KC Optics For Sale 3 11-04-2010 04:59 PM
    Improving long range performance for my "standard" stuff grit Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 10 11-25-2007 12:27 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC