Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Why doesn't anyone talk about 270 Win?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-10-2003, 05:37 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: in front of my computer
Posts: 446
Re: Why doesn\'t anyone talk about 270 Win?

What do you guys want??
A .277 bullet with a BC of 7 or better! [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
IF ya go to www.huntchat.com under rifles, the 270 is being written about. Long versis short action. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
The one with the fancy stool.
Reply With Quote

Unread 03-10-2003, 07:40 AM
Posts: n/a
Re: Why doesn\'t anyone talk about 270 Win?

I agree.. a bullet with a higher B.C. would be nice.... .496 is as good as it gets right now with the .277 but I have heard good things about the new bullets coming our so we'll see....

Like I said I would love and excuse to build a 270WSM
Reply With Quote
Unread 03-10-2003, 02:36 PM
Posts: n/a
Re: Why doesn\'t anyone talk about 270 Win?

What does a coyote look like after running into a 338 bullet. A 90g hp out of a 270 win. is a great coyote round. And you can still use the same gun for big game.
Reply With Quote
Unread 03-10-2003, 08:29 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: McNeal, AZ
Posts: 368
Re: Why doesn\'t anyone talk about 270 Win?


I tried that once a few months back. I told my partner I couldn't stand owning a rifle that had never killed a coyote.

I hit him with a factory 225 grain load at 70 yards, completely removed the heart, literally.

We walked up, looked at him for a minute or two, and for the first time ever, John-Henry pointed out to me that the buzzards need to eat too.

.338 may work well for damage control, but it sucks if you like to save the fur.
If I can kill that coyote from here, Will you walk out to get him?
Reply With Quote
Unread 03-11-2003, 12:45 AM
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Villa Rica ,Ga
Posts: 22
Re: Why doesn\'t anyone talk about 270 Win?

.270? [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]

I'll keep my .338
I like my .338 Winchester Mag
It's tried and True
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-29-2009, 02:34 PM
Bronze Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 58
Re: Why doesn't anyone talk about 270 Win?

I agree with MOA, while calibers have increased dramatically in the last twenty years, and powder selections have filled in obvious gaps in the burning rate spectrum, bullets had not matched the pace.

The real reason the .270 has not created excitement recently is the fact it was designed in the 1930's. Since shooting is basically an application of applied physics and since manufacturers want to sell weapons, creating new calibers to allow us to play with makes the manufacturers ultimately happy. The .270 has been fine from inception, but it hasn't been "new"in 80 years!

New bullets have , at long last, provided the shooter with really finite accuracy and they both expand without blowing up at short range and also expand reliably at really long range, which is the paradigm this forum is based on. Bullets, really, are what sunk the .264 Magnum versus the 7mm mag. They blew up at short range at such very high velocity and those that did not sometime failed to expand at really long range.

Not all "new" bullets are great for hunting. I was told of the extreme accuracy of the Hornady SST's. In my new 6.5 x 284, assembled to benchrest standards, these bullets were the most accurate I ever shot in a hunting rifle. The first prone 100 yard group produced a nice round hole slightly larger than the diameter of the bullet and I was "hooked". I got unhooked when taking a 16"+ Antelope in New Mexico at 300 yards when the core separated from the jacket. I sent the remainder to Hornady and somehow that piece got lost at the Factory. I now use Nosler Accubonds and I am very pleased with the accuracy and expansion allowing easy trailing on White tail deer in forest settings.

So, yes there was a lack of bullet selection for .270's for many years, still a lot of game was taken with these rifles. Nowadays anything you want to do with a .270, you can for all practical purposes with the excellent bullets available. Remember the animals are mammals and have not developed armor plate in 10,000 years. Their lungs and heart will give out when pierced by a modern bullet and they will die!
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-29-2009, 04:03 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 103
Re: Why doesn't anyone talk about 270 Win?

The highest bc bullet I have seen is the berger. I understand that the wildcat 169ULD is quite abit better in bc. That being said the 150 Berger will work in any standard twist 270 win (1/10) I don't know the specs nor have I actually seen that Wildcat bullet. I do hope to soon though
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: Why doesn't anyone talk about 270 Win?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Talk some sense into me! 3fingervic Long Range Hunting & Shooting 13 08-11-2011 02:25 PM
Someone talk me out of a 6.5mm STW sniperjwt Long Range Hunting & Shooting 19 12-30-2009 10:24 AM
Elk talk TAP Elk Hunting 8 09-08-2009 04:32 PM
Talk to me about the 7mm STW Southernfryedyankee Long Range Hunting & Shooting 10 03-19-2009 11:17 AM
Talk me out of a 30-338.?? Jake in NC Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 12 12-06-2002 01:58 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.

All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC