close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics

Reply

Where is the balance between weight and speed?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Unread 10-11-2013, 03:24 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,550
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

Am I wrong in reading that the trade off part is more about shooting a "slightly" lighter bullet at higher rate of speed then a "slightly" heavier bullet at a slower speed?

For example, at 1000 yards 140 grain bullet vs 160.

140 VLD at 2900 fps: at 1000 velocity is 1879 with 1097ft lbs

160 VLF at 2700 fps: at 1000 velocity is 1796 with 1146ft lbs.

If I am reading this thread right the idea is which of these two scenario is goin going to produce the most lethal results? Do you take the velocity or the energy?
Reply With Quote
  •   #16  
    Unread 10-11-2013, 04:01 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2007
    Posts: 1,213
    Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BrentM View Post
    Am I wrong in reading that the trade off part is more about shooting a "slightly" lighter bullet at higher rate of speed then a "slightly" heavier bullet at a slower speed?

    For example, at 1000 yards 140 grain bullet vs 160.

    140 VLD at 2900 fps: at 1000 velocity is 1879 with 1097ft lbs

    160 VLF at 2700 fps: at 1000 velocity is 1796 with 1146ft lbs.

    If I am reading this thread right the idea is which of these two scenario is goin going to produce the most lethal results? Do you take the velocity or the energy?
    I am trying to dupe your numbers.

    Berger makes a 140 vld in 6.5mm.

    Who makes the VLF in 160 grains. And is it in 6.5 cal?

    I was just going to run the windage on your two examples.

    Thanks,
    Tod
    Reply With Quote

      #17  
    Unread 10-11-2013, 04:08 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: May 2008
    Location: South of Canada and North of Wyoming
    Posts: 6,068
    Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BrentM View Post
    Am I wrong in reading that the trade off part is more about shooting a "slightly" lighter bullet at higher rate of speed then a "slightly" heavier bullet at a slower speed?

    For example, at 1000 yards 140 grain bullet vs 160.

    140 VLD at 2900 fps: at 1000 velocity is 1879 with 1097ft lbs

    160 VLF at 2700 fps: at 1000 velocity is 1796 with 1146ft lbs.

    If I am reading this thread right the idea is which of these two scenario is goin going to produce the most lethal results? Do you take the velocity or the energy?
    As far as I can tell, the OP is looking for advantage of trajectory allowing a greater margin of error at longer ranges.

    Quote:
    The 190 gives you a 30" flatter trajectory at 1000yds. That is a lot more room for error in a hunting situation where lets say a deer is at 750yds when you range it then he moves to 780 before you take the shot. I know a bullet of that weight class has plenty of energy at those ranges because I see the Best of the West guys spanking stuff at 900-1100 yds with 168gr berger 7mm.
    What the OP may not realize is that the OVERALL trajectory to a 1000 yds is 30" difference (which is not much) BUT the RATE OF DROP is going to be almost identical between the 2 bullets he's talking about. So no advantage for greater margin of error from the faster lighter bullet.
    __________________
    - Mark

    You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you make good use of it.
    ~ John Quincy Adams
    Reply With Quote
      #18  
    Unread 10-11-2013, 04:41 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Location: Meridian, Idaho
    Posts: 1,550
    Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

    6.5 yes. VLF= NO, that is a typo, it is a VLD. Made in Canada, Matrix.

    I know it is not a .308 caliber. Just trying to understand the topic better. I go back and forth on which I should use. The 140 gets there faster but hits less hard.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC