Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

Where is the balance between weight and speed?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 10-09-2013, 11:09 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,432
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by backyardsniper View Post
I posted a thread here recently on the effectiveness of the 208 amax on elk. There were lots of very helpful responses, some of which got me thinking on another question. What is the ideal weight for hunting bullets in each caliber. This caused me to spend a great deal of time today on the ballistic calculator.

Let me explain what I'm thinking before I get to the question. If you were going to shoot only extremely long range at targets where you know you have a lot of time to range and figure wind then we all agree I think the heavier and the higher the BC the better. Lets use the 300wm for example. Right now my plans were to shoot the 208 amax which I think I can safely push to 2850-2900 in my 27in broughton 5c 300wm. I ran the numbers on the berger 190 at 3100 which I think is do able. I have not used this one but used to regularly get 2875 from the 210 in a 24"5r. If anyone is using these in a 300wm please feel free to give us some actual data. It takes roughly 26moa depending on atmospherics and altitude to reach 1K with the 208 at 375ASL where I live. The 190 gets there at 23moa with almost the same wind drift.

Now, I'm saying this based on a rifle that I plan to employ as a hunting rifle that may be shot from 30yd to I would say 800yd and maybe 1000 absolute max. Like 800yd on elk sized game 1000yds on whitetail sized game due to retained energy considerations and shooting skill level. The 190 gives you a 30" flatter trajectory at 1000yds. That is a lot more room for error in a hunting situation where lets say a deer is at 750yds when you range it then he moves to 780 before you take the shot. I know a bullet of that weight class has plenty of energy at those ranges because I see the Best of the West guys spanking stuff at 900-1100 yds with 168gr berger 7mm. Is there any guys out there running the, what we will call mid weight bullets, instead of the heavies for this reason. I understand the sectional density thing too but I think the 190 have plenty of that probably comparable to or better than the 168 class7mm stuff.
Just looking to get some opinions and thoughts on the subject. Remember were talking about a Longrange hunting rifle , but you want to be able to employ it in all conditions and positions with the most forgiving trajectory possible to help account for field error while still packing enough thump to handle business at the maximum range you intend to shoot.

Thanks guys
There isn't a trade off between weight and speed.

What is optimal is the load which performs best for your rifle and caliber.

The best ballistic calculations are always going to come from the heaviest weight of bullet for the type of bullet you are using.

Not all bullets will shoot well in all rifles which is why so many of us spend so much time tweaking loads to get the best possible load for each rifle.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-10-2013, 11:47 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South of Canada and North of Wyoming
Posts: 5,954
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by angus-5024 View Post
In reference to the other post.... I think more went wrong there than just a bullet with low S.D. There was a bullet that was a tactical model, most likely had the tip closed up (all the OTM's I've killed stuff with had to have the needle in the nose trick), and a unwise shot for the type of bullet.

There is definitely a place for faster bullets, without needing to go to wicked fast "point and shoot" loads. Middle of the road, around 3000 fps, get you farther flatter with the same wind drift and more energy up to a point. The only down side to a slightly lighter bullet is the slightly lighter S.D.
I still have lots of love for the heavies, they just aren't always the best for an application.

The 250 OTM for example is still a heavy bullet! It still has a good S.D (.313 compared to the 215's .324). If it still beats the wind more at a desired distance, and shoots flatter, what's not to like? or a 168 compared to a 180 in 7mm? It still works well. In fact it was the bar for a lot of years for 7mm shooters.

I once shot 225 sst's at 3350 for a season. They are frangible, and they still killed a lot of deer. they have a fairly poor s.d!
The only reason I can think of where a lighter bullet for hunting purposes would be "better" than a heavier one is for farther point blank range. The OP was relating to LR shooting which IMO, makes the case for a heavier high BC bullet all the stronger. He will gain no advantage by using a lighter bullet. This assumes no difference in accuracy.

The other thread I mentioned was the Long Range Thick Skinned Bullets thread. In that thread 250 OTMs were used in a 338 LM to shoot a moose inside 100 yds. The bullets blew up only penetrating 8". Based on that, I would never recommend using the 250's in anything bigger than a 338 WM.

Are you saying the 250 gr bullets buck wind better than the 300 gr bullets? If so, I disagree. If we run the numbers I'm sure it will be close for a while with the 300 gr bullets having a slight edge and increasing that edge farther down range.

I'm not sure what 338 you are shooting but read the thread I mentioned and I think you might change your mind about which frangible bullet to shoot out of a big 338.
__________________
- Mark

You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you make good use of it.
~ John Quincy Adams
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-10-2013, 09:55 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,082
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

Sorry MonatanaRifleman,
I referred to the 778 bull moose down thread (both good threads). In regards to the Berger "fail" (I'm treading lightly here), I have my doubts about what happened in that situation and some of the decisions that were made that may or may not have been poor. Either way, I know that bullets will eventually fail and one "report" isn't conclusive enough for me. When Several people that are fairly well know have bad experiences, then I'll write the bullet off. Now back on track.

If you do run the numbers of the 250 OTM against the 300 OTM, you will be surprised at how long it takes the 300 to catch up. Its a full 1200 yards, which is the effective range of my rifle anyways.
I run a .338 RUM with 250 OTM's at 3050 fps (gonna go faster when I open up the mag well). I used to single feed 300 OTM's at 2760 fps, but see too many grizzlies to not have a second in the mag. Once I switched I liked it ALOT.

I have only killed one black bear with the bullet at 208 yards so I cant say that I have a pile of evidence for the bullet. I shoulder shot the bear (last three hours of the hunting trip and didn't feel like hauling it out any further). Bullet in 2-1/2" out. DRT as it should be with a 250 grain bullet at that range.

When you compare the S.D of the 250 OTM to the S.D of the 215 Berger they are VERY close, and that ones a proven performer.

I would shoot the classic hunters but they are hard to get around here. I would prefer the CE 252's but they are $$$.
One thing that I will say about the 250's is CHECK THE NOSE FOR DEBRIS AND CLOSE UPS!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-10-2013, 09:56 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,082
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

Ohh and I ran into a sow and cub at 15 yards on Sunday, I wasn't too worried about the bullet no penetrating!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-11-2013, 12:22 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South of Canada and North of Wyoming
Posts: 5,954
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by angus-5024 View Post
Sorry MonatanaRifleman,
I referred to the 778 bull moose down thread (both good threads). In regards to the Berger "fail" (I'm treading lightly here), I have my doubts about what happened in that situation and some of the decisions that were made that may or may not have been poor. Either way, I know that bullets will eventually fail and one "report" isn't conclusive enough for me. When Several people that are fairly well know have bad experiences, then I'll write the bullet off. Now back on track.

If you do run the numbers of the 250 OTM against the 300 OTM, you will be surprised at how long it takes the 300 to catch up. Its a full 1200 yards, which is the effective range of my rifle anyways.
I run a .338 RUM with 250 OTM's at 3050 fps (gonna go faster when I open up the mag well). I used to single feed 300 OTM's at 2760 fps, but see too many grizzlies to not have a second in the mag. Once I switched I liked it ALOT.

I have only killed one black bear with the bullet at 208 yards so I cant say that I have a pile of evidence for the bullet. I shoulder shot the bear (last three hours of the hunting trip and didn't feel like hauling it out any further). Bullet in 2-1/2" out. DRT as it should be with a 250 grain bullet at that range.

When you compare the S.D of the 250 OTM to the S.D of the 215 Berger they are VERY close, and that ones a proven performer.

I would shoot the classic hunters but they are hard to get around here. I would prefer the CE 252's but they are $$$.
One thing that I will say about the 250's is CHECK THE NOSE FOR DEBRIS AND CLOSE UPS!
I agree that one report doesn't make a complete case. That said, a lot of other very experienced shooters strongly thought the 250 bullet was too light and fragile for that situation. Your velocity when you shot that bear was probably about 2780. The bullets that hit that moose were probably going close 3000 inside of 100 yds out of a 338 LM. You might want to sneak up on some deer or something and put one through both shoulders at close range with that bullet going close to 3000 fps and see what happens.

Yeah, running the numbers that you give, I'm showing the the 300 has a slight wind advantage from the start which slightly increases going down range.

I understand your wanting a repeater, maybe you can load the 300's deep into the case?

If I was doing your kind of hunting, I would probably shell out the $$$ for the CEB's. I probably wouldn't be shooting a 338 RUM a lot except for a little proficiency now and then and hunting. If you shoot yours a lot, CEB's can get spendy.

Good Hunting!
__________________
- Mark

You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you make good use of it.
~ John Quincy Adams
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-11-2013, 02:36 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 817
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

I see a few referances to the amout of drop, but nothing on WIND DRIFT!! If you are shooting 600, 800, or xxxx. you have to dial up. A few more clicks with the heavier pills means nothing at the shorter ranges any more than the few LESS clicks at the longer ranges. You still have to take the time to dial up. But you will always need less windage with the heavier, higher BC bullet. In my experionce, it is usualy the wind that gets you, not the drop, given that you took the time to range and dial up.

Just my .02.

Tod
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-11-2013, 02:48 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,624
Re: Where is the balance between weight and speed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MontanaRifleman View Post
I understand your wanting a repeater, maybe you can load the 300's deep into the case?
I will reply to this part in an effort to possibly save someone time and money.

I have loaded both the 250 and 300 OTM's in a 338 Lapua magnum. They have the same nose. To make them both fit in the mag box they were both the same distance off the lands. The only difference is the 300 takes up more case volume in doing this with equal OAL's

In the end I loaded the 300's as they shot better from the rifle I was working on. That and the huge difference in what I like from a fragmenting bullet for terminal performance was what prompted me to stay with the 300's.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.86%
1,475 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.08%
1,830 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.12%
1,319 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.01%
571 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.94%
225 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.98%
284 Votes
Total Votes: 5,704
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC