 | Updraft question ? |
|

09-15-2008, 09:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 158
|
|
|
Re: Updraft question ?
AJ,
Thanks for confirming my #'s. Glad to see I was on the right tract. Being a " flatlander " here in the midwest, I don't get an opportunity to take a shot like this in practice.
|

09-15-2008, 09:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Updraft question ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueblue
AJ,
Thanks for confirming my #'s. Glad to see I was on the right tract. Being a " flatlander " here in the midwest, I don't get an opportunity to take a shot like this in practice.
|
I got -0.07 MOA, not .7
AJ
__________________
If some is good and more is better, then too much is just right.
I'd rather have a VP that can gut a Moose, than a President that want's to gut our Second Amendment!
|

09-15-2008, 09:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Back in the Great South!
Posts: 294
|
|
|
Re: Updraft question ?
Thanks AJ, I uhhhhhhh...didn't know that my shiny new toy had that feature change.
|

09-15-2008, 09:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Updraft question ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bravo 4
I got the .25moa less drop from 742 yards compared to the 750 yards. That was from both exbal and JBM. I did account for the down draft on the opposite side, but about as much as I accounted for the up draft on the shooter's side...none.
My daughter and I drew an illustration of the scenario if anybody wants me to send it to them and they can post it. I'm not smart enough, as the drawing will prove!!! 
|
Here is your picture. (yes you sent me the right one,  )
AJ

__________________
If some is good and more is better, then too much is just right.
I'd rather have a VP that can gut a Moose, than a President that want's to gut our Second Amendment!
|

09-15-2008, 09:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 158
|
|
|
Re: Updraft question ?
So,
Can someone show me the math so I can see where I went wrong.
|

09-15-2008, 10:55 PM
|
|
Sponsor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 1,227
|
|
|
Re: Updraft question ?
I have worked quite a bit with this kind of shooting problem in canyon shooting. I would have done this:
1. Ran my PPC for 750 yards @ .99 cosine and got my dope.
2. Noted the head wind velocity and the apparent angle of the facing slope being 20 degrees or so and around 4-5 mph.
3. I would consult my wind reading for 4-5 mph at 500 yards as this is 2/3 of the shot distance. This would be about 1.00 moa, now 20 degrees is roughly 1/4 value in wind making the effective updraft about 1/4 moa on paper. I have found the wind to almost always be faster in the open air than by the walls so I would have backed off .50 moa from the computer generated dope for 750 @.99. If you have my video the 1602 yard shot is suffering from the same effect but from a different direction. On that shot we used the method I just outlined and backed 2.00 moa off and were still .5 high on the first shot. It maybe hard to put to paper but I have seen this effect to cause repeated high bullet strikes in a varity of conditions. It takes a bit of practice because I have not seen the down draft from the opposite canyon wall have much if any effect. I have seen many times the down draft from a tailwind in this same scenerio cause a drop in bullet impact and require more elevation. I figure the correction the same way only add the offset. This is how I have done it, but as with anything wind related it is always your best guess.
|

09-17-2008, 01:30 AM
|
|
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: VICTORIA AUSTRALIA
Posts: 578
|
|
Re: Updraft question ?
Thanks all for the detailed responses. I think you guys are all on the same page. Speaking the same language !
I see where you are coming from and understand the math now .
Many thanks guys !!
Cheers for now
DUH
__________________
With each step in the bush, you are a step closer.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.