Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

Single shot vs. mag. fed

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2008, 10:47 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chatham, VA
Posts: 436
Single shot vs. mag. fed

Just a curiosity, how many folks here either use a single shot action or load such that the rounds won't feed from the magazine for a big game rifle? I can't remember ever taking a second shot at an animal where I had to do it fast enough that I could not have just fed it in manually.

How about a varmint rifle, different answer?
__________________
"My greatest fear is that after my demise my wife will sell my guns for the price I told her I paid for them"
-don't know where it came from...but true
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2008, 11:55 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 483
Re: Single shot vs. mag. fed

I do not have a single shot action on any of my hunting guns, buit I ussally single feed them while long range hunting. I will have the mag loaded with with rounds that fit the mag that shoot good out to say 300 yards but have other ammo tested for longrange applications.

The way i decide is if I am prone and can effectively single feed i will, but walking around in the woods where a single shot reload would be difficult I stick to the mag.

Most all my shooting is single feed. Heck i just shot a "sniper" Match at my local gun club and shoot my PSS single feed. You had to start with an empty gun and it took to much time to load. You can shoot almost as fast single feed as you can with a mag system. No one beat me on time in the event and most had detacable mag systems preloaded.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2008, 12:27 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central Washington
Posts: 491
Re: Single shot vs. mag. fed

I find that having a magazine allows me to take more time focusing on the shot that worrying about reloading if I miss.

BUT...I don't hunt anything but varmints, (coyotes mostly) and most of my shooting is at targets, not animals!

I shot a long range, well for this forum it was more medium range, (400-750 yards) class last spring with an AR15 in 6.5 Grendel, and had comparable success to the bolt guns, but was able to shoot a lot more rounds, thus getting a lot more practice, in the 2 day course.

My two sons and I went through 600-700 rounds, I don't think that would have been much fun single feeding!

Bill
__________________

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

Thomas Jefferson

http://waitesandbalances.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2008, 12:48 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Myrtle Creek Or.
Posts: 30
Re: Single shot vs. mag. fed

I have three rifles that are single shot. All of which, because of the way I seat the bullet, would make it imposible to feed through a magazine. The first is a Savage model 12 Low Profile in 223. The next 2 are custom built wildcats. The first of the 2 is a 6.5-06 ackley improved that I use for 1000 yard plus shooting. The next is a 375/300 that I use as a long range, 600-800 yrd., heavy hitter. All three are extremely accurate.

I do own a Yogo WWII 8mm Mauser that allows me to load so the bullet kisses the rifling and still mag feeds. It is also accurate, printing 4" groups at 450 yrds.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-20-2008, 03:23 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 213
Re: Single shot vs. mag. fed

If it bothers you enough, you CAN have your cake and eat it too -- there's several mag systems that will accommodate nice long cartridge OAL. If you build a custom, no reason not to include such a system if you are building a repeater for long range. Depending on the rifle, it may not be all that difficult for a competent smith to install such a system in an existing rifle. Just thought I'd throw that out there....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-20-2008, 06:34 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chatham, VA
Posts: 436
Re: Single shot vs. mag. fed

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattj View Post
If it bothers you enough, you CAN have your cake and eat it too -- there's several mag systems that will accommodate nice long cartridge OAL. If you build a custom, no reason not to include such a system if you are building a repeater for long range. Depending on the rifle, it may not be all that difficult for a competent smith to install such a system in an existing rifle. Just thought I'd throw that out there....
I know about Wyatt's, are there any that can be made to function on a Savage action?
__________________
"My greatest fear is that after my demise my wife will sell my guns for the price I told her I paid for them"
-don't know where it came from...but true
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-20-2008, 06:56 PM
SPONSOR
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,686
Re: Single shot vs. mag. fed

I use single-shots (handguns) all the time and do not see it as a disadvantage.
BTW-I do NOT hunt dangerous game.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Single shot vs. mag. fed
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single shot rifles RandyHenke General Discussion 2 10-26-2010 12:04 PM
rem 700 single shot murdoc 6798 Guns For Sale 0 09-13-2010 04:30 PM
Witchita Single Shot Stokes Guns For Sale 1 09-12-2010 06:27 PM
WTS/WTT: 1885 Single Shot Full Auto Guns For Sale 0 11-18-2009 10:58 PM
Barrett 99 single shot 50 bmg lastchance67 Guns For Sale 0 09-27-2004 09:42 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC