close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics

Reply

rem 700

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Unread 01-01-2014, 06:12 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Torrington Wy
Posts: 105
Re: rem 700

Thanks for the heads up on the bushnell scope. How do these compare to leoupold of the same $.
Reply With Quote
  •   #9  
    Unread 01-01-2014, 06:23 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Alabama
    Posts: 9,472
    Re: rem 700

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by IdahoJoe View Post
    Thanks for the heads up on the bushnell scope. How do these compare to leoupold of the same $.
    For a budget optic, I recommend this:

    Vortex Viper HS Long Range Rifle Scope 30mm Tube 4-16x 50mm Side Focus
    __________________
    "I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns..." - Bob Lee Swagger

    "Give me a minute...I'm good. Give me an hour...I'm great. Give me 6 months...And I'm unbeatable." - Col. Hannibal Smith

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
    The 284 is to the STW what a tricycle is to a Ninja.
    Reply With Quote

      #10  
    Unread 01-01-2014, 11:39 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2010
    Location: Torrington Wy
    Posts: 105
    Re: rem 700

    Alright I adjusted the trigger to acceptable performance

    how hard is it to bed the action myself and any advice there.

    I do reload and have 30-06 dies and components so the ammo part isn't a concern.

    Thanks again
    Reply With Quote
      #11  
    Unread 01-01-2014, 11:41 PM
    Official LRH Sponsor
     
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: N. Texas and S. Africa
    Posts: 7,704
    Re: rem 700

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by IdahoJoe View Post
    I have a rem 700 in 30-06 that was given to me by my father in-law. The gun is in good shape but currently has a tasco scope and a 5 lb trigger pull and the stock (wood) feels like it needs bedded and the floated.
    I don't really know what the accuracy potential is in the factory barrel because i can't shoot a rifle well with out a good scope and a lighter trigger. My question is what should I do with it. I would like to keep it in 30-06 as a backup gun. (though I could be talked into a 280 rem). My typical hunting range is 300 yrds though I am confident to about 500.
    My current big game gun is a cooper jackson hunter in 6.5-284 that shoots better than me.

    should i adjust the factory trigger and try it as is

    should I replace the factory trigger with a timmney

    should I replace the stock with a composite one
    should I replace the barrel
    Save the money for something else
    Decent optics are a given

    Thanks for the Ideas
    I would just get a good trigger job done, lap the lugs, install pillars and do a good float/bedding job on it and see how it then shoots.

    Of course I'd also put better glass on it. At 500yds and less that should be all you need.
    __________________
    Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
    Reply With Quote
      #12  
    Unread 01-01-2014, 11:44 PM
    Official LRH Sponsor
     
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: N. Texas and S. Africa
    Posts: 7,704
    Re: rem 700

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by IdahoJoe View Post
    Alright I adjusted the trigger to acceptable performance

    how hard is it to bed the action myself and any advice there.

    I do reload and have 30-06 dies and components so the ammo part isn't a concern.

    Thanks again
    Go over to Youtube and enter "pillar bedding" in the search engine.
    __________________
    Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
    Reply With Quote
      #13  
    Unread 01-02-2014, 09:45 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: Kansas
    Posts: 295
    Re: rem 700

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by IdahoJoe View Post
    Thanks for the heads up on the bushnell scope. How do these compare to leoupold of the same $.
    I don't own any Leopold's. I have looked through a few of them. as a matter of fact, I just did a trigger job on a MK77 with a low-end Leopold and I was not impressed at all. My general thought on the Leopold scopes is that you are paying quite a bit for the name. I also think with Bushnell and Burris, you are getting more scope for the money, though you can brag to your friends as much.
    .
    Reply With Quote
      #14  
    Unread 01-02-2014, 10:05 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2009
    Posts: 409
    Re: rem 700

    +1 on Burris scopes. I own three. One is a Full Field II, the other two are Signature series. Excellent performance, excellent value.

    The older Nikon Ultra Clear Coat (UCC) scopes are great if you can find one.

    I put a Weaver K3 on a rimfire rifle and have been very impressed with it.

    The older Redfield I have on my 221 Fireball has a wide field of view lens, very clear distortion free optics.

    ... but my favorite scope is my Zeiss Conquest.

    Money spent on good quality optics is money well spent. Get the best scope you can afford and plan to keep it. Nice thing about scopes is you can move them from gun to gun.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC