Rangefinder????

[500mag_guy]

Originally Posted by 6.5Express

Not trying to hijack the thread here, but what do you guys find about the leica that tops the swarovski? In most of the threads, reviews, etc. that I've read, folks seem to prefer the swaro. Seeing three responses in a row quickly like that preferring the leica has got me rethinking this seriously.

My leica and others i have uses have always read beautifully everytime where as for the swarovski though it is an excellent rangefinder and i have seriously thought about one i seem to alway have problems reading ranges. Another thing that really sold me on the leica over the swarovski is the read out and the range square or circle is 100 times brighter and easier to see on the leica where as for rhe swarovski it is very dim and hard to see.

+1 for leica!!

[FEENIX]

Another vote for the Leica 1600!

Leica Rangemaster 1600 CRF initial test !

[500mag_guy]

Haha not to change the subject but all montana boys voting here. Lol we must be the only ones that get up this early.

[T3-OleMan]

Originally Posted by FEENIX

Another vote for the Leica 1600!

Leica Rangemaster 1600 CRF initial test !

10X on the LEICA 1600. Here is my home work on this unit.
Buying Insurance with ..........in Timber ACCURATE RANGE!!

Great glass
small -lite
smallest target area

Good luck

[bushido2222]

I have run all three also...I am currently running the zeiss...I found that the Swaro was superior if it was on a tripod and you had enough time...two things I don't usually have in the field I bought the zeiss before the crf1600 came out..I already had the crf900 and love it but it came up a little shy...I don't think you could go wrong with either, but the Leica fits in a shirt pocket and the Nimrod small pouch

[ltrbuck]

Leica owns the rangefinder world with the CRF 1600 in the under $1000 range....

[FEENIX]

Originally Posted by 500mag_guy

Haha not to change the subject but all montana boys voting here. Lol we must be the only ones that get up this early.

LL!