Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 12-23-2011, 02:15 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,440
Re: Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmden View Post
Easy choice--NPR1.

I don't think we should be taking shortcuts when shooting game. If you really understand ballistic reticles and yardage marked turrets and their limitations and have a ballistic computer to help you adjust the ballistic reticle to differing environmental conditions, then they are fine.

Good luck!
I agree with most all your comments and fully agree with your acknowledgment that whatever approach, MOA, turret, or Reticle you must have solid ballistics information calculated for the actual conditions. But I think you leave the definite impression that reticles, and in my case a preference for turrets, are substandard approaches and designed for the microwave crowd. I have used all of them for hunting and target shooting out to 1000 yards, my effective hunting range. A calibrated turret combined with ballistics knowledge for fine tuning for current conditions, for me has proven to be the most effective long range hunting technique. I usually don't have all the time in the world for a shot for messing around with charts or calculators( I do have them with me though) , and lighting might be poor so it's difficult to see MOA scales on a turret. Time is critical and if I do have it I'd rather use it for confirmed wind doping. If I'm target shooting yes, I prefer MOA , if I'm hunting I'll take ballistic turrets that are precisely made for my hunting area and commit current condition adjustments to
memory. I don't give up anything to an MOA system and have had good hunting success. Just an alternative viewpoint, each to their own.
__________________

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready"-T. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-23-2011, 02:36 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,612
Re: Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox View Post
I agree with most all your comments and fully agree with your acknowledgment that whatever approach, MOA, turret, or Reticle you must have solid ballistics information calculated for the actual conditions. But I think you leave the definite impression that reticles, and in my case a preference for turrets, are substandard approaches and designed for the microwave crowd. I have used all of them for hunting and target shooting out to 1000 yards, my effective hunting range. A calibrated turret combined with ballistics knowledge for fine tuning for current conditions, for me has proven to be the most effective long range hunting technique. I usually don't have all the time in the world for a shot for messing around with charts or calculators( I do have them with me though) , and lighting might be poor so it's difficult to see MOA scales on a turret. Time is critical and if I do have it I'd rather use it for confirmed wind doping. If I'm target shooting yes, I prefer MOA , if I'm hunting I'll take ballistic turrets that are precisely made for my hunting area and commit current condition adjustments to
memory. I don't give up anything to an MOA system and have had good hunting success. Just an alternative viewpoint, each to their own.

Like I said before, if you understand the limitations and ballistics involved, they work fine out to a certain yardage, beyond which shots with consistent precision should likely only be taken on game with MOA/MIL systems with properly calibrated ballistic computers using proven data taken from those practice shooting on paper/steel at extended ranges.

Companies like Gunwerks and Greybull Precision use yardage marked turrets, but typically not past 1K yds, with great success. I just hope their customers do 'due diligence' and understand what's going on.
__________________
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?" Thomas Jefferson - Notes on the State of Virginia

www.wildsidesystems.com - Shelter for Your WildSide - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYwgo...&feature=g-upl
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-24-2011, 02:05 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gillette, Wy
Posts: 243
Re: Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmden View Post
Easy choice--NPR1. An MOA reticle will serve you much better in the long run. NF also makes combo ballistics turrets (MOA and yardage markings for your load in a given set of environmental conditions) for the NF made G7 Gunwerks scope. Go to gunwerks.com to see them. Perhaps you could order a NF G7 Gunwerks scope with and NPR1 reticle, I don't know.

Why MOA? If you need to do a quick adjustment for your second shot, if your spotter understands the very easy MOA system, he can just tell you what to adjust in MOA (up, down, L or R) and you can then use the reticle to do that, precisely. With the the Velocity reticle, and any ballistic reticle, how to you make precise and quick adjustments for second shots? Even truly precise first shots using the reticle, are going to be questionable.

Ballistic reticles are meant for the digestion of the masses who do not truly understand ballistics. And, the fact of the matter is that you really do need a ballistic computer program, such as Exbal, that have the various reticles in the software to even know where your load will hit in a given set of environmental conditions.

Can you tell I don't like them? Like yardage marked turrets that are only good in one specific set of environmental conditions, the same is true, but on an even less precise scale for ballistic reticles. If you really delve into ballistics, turrets, reticles, etc., you will start to understand the inherently imprecise nature of yardage marked turrets and ballistic reticles. They do work, but I have always thought that that fill a market niche often (not always true, but often so) for folks that don't want to put the time into truly understanding ballistics and so find this seemingly great shortcut.

I don't think we should be taking shortcuts when shooting game. If you really understand ballistic reticles and yardage marked turrets and their limitations and have a ballistic computer to help you adjust the ballistic reticle to differing environmental conditions, then they are fine. But I have found the folks I know with ballistic reticles, in general, don't do those things--the result is imprecise shots. All at the time when they think they've got this great long range system.

A basic tenet of true long range hunting is to use a heavy for caliber, high BC bullet that still works well on game.

With that in mind, you should consider shooting a bullet of at least 200g such as the 200g Accubond, 210 Berger, 208 Amax, 240 SMK,etc. Even better would be the 230g Berger. Many very experienced long range guys here will tell you that the 230g bullet is just about perfect for the size 300RUM chambering to maximize it's potential energy at long ranges. Spend a little time on a ballistic calculator and this becomes very apparent when you check energy and wind drift numbers at long range. It is very hard to convince folks, that do not really understand long range shooting, of these simple facts. Your 180g bullet will not perform nearly as well at truly long ranges in terms of retained energy or reduced wind drift as the heavier for caliber bullets mentioned above. Go for the 230g Berger and don't look back, would be my advice.

Good luck!
I'll disagree. 1 shot 1 kills out to 550yd this season. With a light 87gn .243 with Nikon BDC reticle. Ballistic reticles are not some gimick, they fill the space between using point blank range zero and using turrents. They are very good for medium range fast shots 300 to 600 yds. Using Nikons Spot On. I know exact yardage for each point on reticle for conditions and load, prior to going out on hunt.

I am much faster with it then using turrents at that range.

Can't decide? Get a scope with both. Use the ballistic reticle for those fast shots and dial it when you have time.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-24-2011, 05:16 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 869
Re: Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1

I have 3 nfx zero stop and 4 lupys with ballistic reticle. I have one br on a 6x284 thats the loads works next to perfect the rest im thinking about selling. Main problem guns im using them on im over shooting the set hash mark say the 300 yard hash i should be using it for 350 very confusing to keep that information in your head. Remember the basics range it, click it, then send it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:48 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,440
Re: Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmden View Post
Like I said before, if you understand the limitations and ballistics involved, they work fine out to a certain yardage, beyond which shots with consistent precision should likely only be taken on game with MOA/MIL systems with properly calibrated ballistic computers using proven data taken from those practice shooting on paper/steel at extended ranges.

Companies like Gunwerks and Greybull Precision use yardage marked turrets, but typically not past 1K yds, with great success. I just hope their customers do 'due diligence' and understand what's going on.
I agree with your clarification that for extended long range shooting in excess of 1000 yards, MOA is the way to go. The OP was talking about about under 1000 yards by considering a 1000 yard ballistic Reticle. That's why I chimed in.
__________________

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready"-T. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-24-2011, 08:21 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 286
Re: Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucknbach View Post
I'll disagree. 1 shot 1 kills out to 550yd this season. With a light 87gn .243 with Nikon BDC reticle. Ballistic reticles are not some gimick, they fill the space between using point blank range zero and using turrents. They are very good for medium range fast shots 300 to 600 yds. Using Nikons Spot On. I know exact yardage for each point on reticle for conditions and load, prior to going out on hunt.

I am much faster with it then using turrents at that range.

Can't decide? Get a scope with both. Use the ballistic reticle for those fast shots and dial it when you have time.
X 2 Use the ballistic reticle for fast shots and dial when time permits
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Nightforce reticle. Velocity or npr1
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3.5x15x50 Nightforce NPR1 oklarcher Optics For Sale 0 08-23-2011 10:52 AM
Nightforce Velocity Reticle 1eye Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 0 08-15-2011 08:14 AM
nightforce velocity reticle partisan1911 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 1 10-12-2010 03:33 PM
wtb nightforce npr1 dennis Optics For Sale 0 03-21-2009 08:55 AM
Nightforce Software pre-programmed for NPR1 reticle? snarbles Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 09-24-2007 09:42 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC