Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Mill or moa

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-16-2011, 04:28 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Mill or moa

I'm looking at a nightforce nxs 22x. I dont know if I should go moa or mill. It will be used mostly for hunting with some long range shooting for fun. Gonna mount on a custom 700 300rum
Reply With Quote

Unread 12-16-2011, 05:04 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,608
Re: Mill or moa

They both work.

So, it usually comes down to personal preference.

I find it easier to with with MOA.

-- richard
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2011, 05:06 PM
Bronze Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 68
Re: Mill or moa

MOA is easier for me too.
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2011, 05:11 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,232
Re: Mill or moa

MOA is easier for me as well. I also think they re-sell better.

If some is good and more is better, then too much is just right.

My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2011, 05:24 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 8,319
Re: Mill or moa

Another vote for MOA, just easier for me at any distance and is a slightly smaller / finer adjustment. But what ever you go with I suggest you go with a reticle to match. For example .25 moa turrets with either an NP-R1 or a NP-R2 reticle so the hash marks match the unit of measure on the turrets.

Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2011, 08:51 PM
Gold Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 944
Re: Mill or moa


mil needs to go away. i don't know of one advantage of going with mil over moa. i can think of a handful of advantages to moa.
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2011, 09:33 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 140
Re: Mill or moa

Mil only. Wont go into the debate but have been with mils for over 5 years and don't see myself going backwards to moa. Here is one example. Lets say 338 edge with 300 gr, 100 yds zero, one mile takes apprx 17.2 mils. That is one full turn(10mil) and then go to 7.2 with NF scope. Now same shot but with moa scope, it takes apprx 58.5 moa to get to same mile target, that is almost 3 full turns of the turret on NF scope. So you get the question, is that 2 or 3 full turns when you are turning the elevation turret. Now lets make it more interesting. Let say same rifle but shooting to 1975yds. Mils is 28 (2.8 turns) and moa is 96.32 (almost 5 full turns). Now that is with NF scope and other manufacturers are actually worse. Leu is 15 moa per turn, not 20 like NF and would be 6.42ish turns to get to same target at 1975.

Just my .02 and let the bashing commence.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: Mill or moa
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
smithy AT-300 LATHE/MILL jgss2 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 2 02-12-2011 09:13 PM
Wtb falcon menace 4-14 mill/mill tbshltn Optics For Sale 1 02-01-2011 03:49 PM
New Mill Jrigby Gunsmithing 8 07-20-2010 09:48 AM
Mill ranging limits angus-5024 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 6 07-25-2009 03:07 PM
Mill Dot holdover cabelas90 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 9 03-16-2009 06:48 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC