Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2011, 01:57 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bettles Field, AK
Posts: 156
Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

I'm just getting into real long range hunting so please forgive if my questions irritate.

I want to dial the distance to hold the reticule on the target--not guesstimate using holdover--already had a lifetime of that. While my targets are large the range is long and sometimes in poor light, but most times I can shoot from a solid platform. Millet offers their 6-25x56 with a 35mm tube, but only mil-dot reticule. Using a 12" kill zone at 400 to 1400 yards would their scope work?

And what's the advantages & disadvantages of .1 mill adj. opposed to 1/4 moa?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2011, 10:54 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,632
Re: Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alcesgigas View Post
I'm just getting into real long range hunting so please forgive if my questions irritate.

I want to dial the distance to hold the reticule on the target--not guesstimate using holdover--already had a lifetime of that. While my targets are large the range is long and sometimes in poor light, but most times I can shoot from a solid platform. Millet offers their 6-25x56 with a 35mm tube, but only mil-dot reticule. Using a 12" kill zone at 400 to 1400 yards would their scope work?

And what's the advantages & disadvantages of .1 mill adj. opposed to 1/4 moa?
My favorite reticles in order.

IOR MP-8 with floating dot.

Leupold TMR

Leupold mil dot.

Each of those offers advantages, one of which being that if you miss and spot it, they help you judge how much you need to adjust.

A scope in the power range you are talking about will certainly work, but for myself I would not buy a Millet. For precision long range shooting on game you need 100% reliability.

I'd say look at Leupold, IOR, NF or if price is a serious concern look at the vortex vipers.

the 1/4 mil adjustments are my preference as they are a bit more precise.

One mil equals about 3.4 MOA so .1mil equals .34 MOA.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2011, 11:03 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SOCIALIST CONTROLLED TERRITORY OF NEW YORK
Posts: 4,389
Re: Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

I agree that MP8 is very nice, I dont know how they get it so small on a FFP optic. I am running a TMR right now and I like it alot more that then USMC mil dot I use to run. It odscures less of my target and allows for more precise hold overs and ranging.

I dont know much about millet scopes but from what I have heard I would consider a few others in that price range first. The bushnell ellite or the vortex viper pst, again just what I have heard maybe millet is GTG.
__________________
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf"
If you want to shoot Bergers start here!
http://www.longrangehunting.com/arti...accuracy-1.php
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2011, 11:48 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,148
Re: Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

What cartridge, bullet and velocity are you running?

A lot of guys like that scope but I don't have any personal experience with it. It gets pretty good reviews at optics talk and has enough adjustment to get you where you want to go at 1400 yards. Dead nuts repeatability and toughness are the most important factors though so you don't want to crimp on optics at the distances you are talking about shooting. The more recoil happy gun you have the less I would personally look at the Millett.

As far as scopes I would at least get matching reticle and turrets, so MIL/MIL or MOA/MOA. Having a MIL reticle to assist in calling misses then having to dial in MOA is a pain in the butt!

Despite what some guys will tell you MOA and MIL are both angular measurements so they can be used exactly the same. Most guys get all tied up in the math but if you are really using them right there isn't any math to do unless you are using the reticle to range targets. And I don't so the math is mostly a moot point for me.

On most scopes MIL's are broken down by 10th's so 10 clicks per MIL.
Each MOA is broken down approximately in 1/4's so 4 clicks per MOA.

1 MIL click, 1/10 of a MIL, equals .36 inches.
1 MOA click, 1/4 of an MOA, equals .26 inches.

So 1/10 MIL clicks are courser adjustments by .1 of an inch. Even out to distances past 1000 yards 1/10 MIL clicks aren't too course for hunting purposes IMO. If you shoot the really long stuff then you may find an advantage to the finer adjustments MOA provide.

1 MIL equals 3.6 inches at 100 yards
1 MOA equals 1.047 inches at 100 yards. Many guys just round the clicks to .25 and MOA to 1 which is why for some the math side is easier with MOA

I personally like MIL a bit better because it is a lot easier to read a chart that tells me I need to dial 7.2 MIL's compared to needing to dial 24 MOA. Smaller numbers means easier to remember and less chance of mistakes for me anyway. Usually there is more MIL's on 1 revolution of a turret than there is MOA's so that means less turns of the turret which is a time saver and it helps minimize getting lost on what revolution of the turret you are on if your scope doesn't have zero stops.

If you want to get into the math of it all, and I would suggest you don't, then you will have to decide what math is easier 1/4's or 1/10's.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-11-2011, 12:34 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bettles Field, AK
Posts: 156
Re: Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

I surely appreciate all this information!

That being sincerely said I should say that I've read nothing but good stuff about the newer LRS-1 Millets; I've read nothing but great stuff about NF and USO, but before I plunge for that expense I'd like to get some time/experience under my belt with my first long range dedicated rifle. Here's how it's shaping up right now:
Winchester M70 (375H&H donor) Classic Stainless, squared & lapped, Hart 30" (1.250-1.000") with a Muscle Magnum 4 brake in 338 Edge. I'm still fluid on the rest, but leaning to running 300SMKs around 2830fps--I'll be getting my dies from DE right off...

However, I'm too fast approaching septuagenarian status and I will need to get a good range finder, PDA, Kestrel, a whole new selection of propellants as I've loaded only for 270 and 375 H&H for many years. I'm in great health and am forced to hunt for meat (God, what a dreadful thing) and moose being my mainstay I must drop them where I can get my--now necessary--equipment to extricate all that poundage. Jeez its taken soooooo long to get the wife sympathizing with me on this horrendously laborious undertaking--she actually comes along to help. Good thing she doesn't read this site; if all goes right in ten years or so all I'll have to do is pull the trigger... She is 15 years younger than me! Amazing what moose and caribou do for you... So I really cannot indulge my predilections overly much--and live.

But if all this goes as I think it will I've already begun dreaming about a 375CT or AM whizzing those 350SMKs from its 34" barrel--launched from it's 30# heft, NF 5.5-22x56 zero-stop mil-radian perched up top in Murphy SS rings & base. If I got it all right off what's left to dream about?

But please keep these responses up because every day I find how little I really know. It's great.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2011, 01:00 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,632
Re: Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alcesgigas View Post
I surely appreciate all this information!

That being sincerely said I should say that I've read nothing but good stuff about the newer LRS-1 Millets; I've read nothing but great stuff about NF and USO, but before I plunge for that expense I'd like to get some time/experience under my belt with my first long range dedicated rifle. Here's how it's shaping up right now:
Winchester M70 (375H&H donor) Classic Stainless, squared & lapped, Hart 30" (1.250-1.000") with a Muscle Magnum 4 brake in 338 Edge. I'm still fluid on the rest, but leaning to running 300SMKs around 2830fps--I'll be getting my dies from DE right off...

However, I'm too fast approaching septuagenarian status and I will need to get a good range finder, PDA, Kestrel, a whole new selection of propellants as I've loaded only for 270 and 375 H&H for many years. I'm in great health and am forced to hunt for meat (God, what a dreadful thing) and moose being my mainstay I must drop them where I can get my--now necessary--equipment to extricate all that poundage. Jeez its taken soooooo long to get the wife sympathizing with me on this horrendously laborious undertaking--she actually comes along to help. Good thing she doesn't read this site; if all goes right in ten years or so all I'll have to do is pull the trigger... She is 15 years younger than me! Amazing what moose and caribou do for you... So I really cannot indulge my predilections overly much--and live.

But if all this goes as I think it will I've already begun dreaming about a 375CT or AM whizzing those 350SMKs from its 34" barrel--launched from it's 30# heft, NF 5.5-22x56 zero-stop mil-radian perched up top in Murphy SS rings & base. If I got it all right off what's left to dream about?

But please keep these responses up because every day I find how little I really know. It's great.
The added info definitely makes it easier to make good recommendations.

In a heavy recoiling magnum like the .388 edge I absolutely wouldn't suggest going with a cheap scope like the Millett. The odds of having a serious scope failure when it really counts are just too high.

You can pick up a good used Leupold VX III 6-20x50 for around 700-800.00, or a Mark 4 or IOR tactical 6-24x50 for around 1,000.00.

You can pick up the vortex viper PST's for quite a bit less than that.

Just watch Ebay, and the classifieds here and over at sniper's hide and you can get some very good deals on high quality glass and eliminate the gamble.

With the kind of recoil force of the edge I'd seriously say lean towards the tacical scopes as they are built to handle more shock.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-11-2011, 02:08 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,148
Re: Mil-dot or not: Mil adj. or MOA?

Yes, the Millets are getting pretty good reviews but I am not sure I have personally read anything with them on a gun like the 338 edge. That is a big recoiling gun. I would personally do some more searching to see if anyone has a good bit of time on a big gun like the edge before you spend the cash. If you would have said something in the 6.5 to lower 30 caliber range I would say go for it but I would be very hesitant to do it on one of the big boys!

Good luck!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 29.76%
50 Votes
NO - 55.36%
93 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 14.88%
25 Votes
Total Votes: 168
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC