Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

A Middle Weight Contender

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:31 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ND
Posts: 2,716
Re: A Middle Weight Contender

Sounds like a 284 Win is what you need, around 2000-2200 rounds of barrel life, low recoil (rom what i have heard), has lapua brass, is inherintly accurate, can push a 168 grain bullet to 2850 fps, plenty of steam for deer at 700 yards+. Cant go wrong.
__________________

I'm 15
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth."
~George Washington

"The only advantage a light rifle has is weight, all other advantages go to the heavy rifle."
~ JE Custom

Biggest fail of 2014 so far... http://www.longrangehunting.com/foru...ea-ftf-128972/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:11 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Centre County, Pa
Posts: 211
Re: A Middle Weight Contender

You could also look into the 6.5x47mm Lapua. I built one for my wife and it is pleasant to shoot and is a tack driver!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-18-2012, 08:41 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Alberton,Montana USA
Posts: 38
Re: A Middle Weight Contender

Firecat,I have had the same thoughts as you and yesterday I bought a Savage LRH in 6.5x284.Looking forward to hunting the "Missouri Breaks' next year.Paid less than $700.00 for it and going to get a VortexViper 6-20x50 scope.

Randy
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:08 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The cold part of Montana
Posts: 1,390
Re: A Middle Weight Contender

Quote:
Originally Posted by nifrand View Post
Firecat,I have had the same thoughts as you and yesterday I bought a Savage LRH in 6.5x284.Looking forward to hunting the "Missouri Breaks' next year.Paid less than $700.00 for it and going to get a VortexViper 6-20x50 scope.

Randy
which area you applying for? I do most of my elk hunting there.
__________________
Keep in mind the animals we shoot for food and display are not bullet proof. Contrary to popular belief, they bleed and die just like they did a hundred years ago. Being competent with a given rifle is far more important than impressive ballistics and poor shootability. High velocity misses never put a steak in the freezer.

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:35 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 441
Re: A Middle Weight Contender

I'm a 7-08 fan, stick a 162 in it an watch it shine. Also burned out a couple of 6.5-284's. tough choice I like em all

I would also throw in the 6.5x47L and with a quick neck down a 6x47L it is some of the toughest Lapua brass you will find. It can hadle some stout loads.
__________________
"Fast is fine accurate is final"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-19-2012, 02:16 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,633
Re: A Middle Weight Contender

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firecat View Post
I have had an idea rolling around in my head for the last year or so. I would like to put together a middle weight rifle for medium ranges on up to deer sized game. I have rifles in most caliber offerings. Most are heavy hitters for caliber. For example, 7 mm Rem Mag, 25/06, 300 win Mag, 300 RUM. The idea has been for a low recoiling economical round to shoot but still very much able to play at mid range distances. Ranges somewhere around 600 - 900 yards on steel. I would like to be able to shoot deer out to 700 yards or so. I have a few calibers that i keep returning to but would like to hear what you have to say. There are no right or wrong answers here other than to say that whatever caliber I choose will need to have decent barrel life. I would like to build the rifle to have a 24-26 inch barrel in a #4 or 5 contour that is fluted.

Here are a few of the calibers that I have been thinking about.

6mm Rem
6mm Rem Imp
260 Rem
260 Rem Imp
7mm-08
7mm-08 Imp
Of those mentioned I'd go with the .260. If you are not just stuck on a short action I'd say .264wm or 7mm Mag are the two most ideal choices followed by the 300wm or 300WSM.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-19-2012, 12:39 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So. Utah
Posts: 396
Re: A Middle Weight Contender

I am not stuck on a Short action. In fact I have a remington 700 long action that has just come available. So this could change a few options. I hadn't considered the 284 winchester but seems viable enough. I also would consider the 264 win mag. does anyone have any experience with a 7mm-08 Improved? I still think that even the 260 with a 130 grain berger is a very hard to beat combination.
__________________
If you always do what you've always done, you will always get what you've always got.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 31.86%
65 Votes
NO - 51.96%
106 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.18%
33 Votes
Total Votes: 204
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC