Join 65,000 Long Range Hunting members.
Please register for FREE to get full access.    
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine



Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting


Reply

A-Max vs. MatchKing

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 05-12-2003, 10:25 AM
Writers Guild
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,459
Re: A-Max vs. MatchKing

Brent, good question with the 100yds zero, tripled checked the info cause I couldn't believe there was that much of a difference. The big test was to shoot all the different bullets on the same day at the same distance and measure the drop. The loads were chronographed and all were within 50fps of each other- I consider that the same speed.

The results were that the poly tipped bullets flew flatter then the HP designs and that the SST was the flattest of them all. If you put the bullets side by side, the SST is the longest followed by the AMax/BT, then the J4. 165 and 168gr bullets.

Repeated the test, in part, with two other rifles just to compare. For small to mid size cases in 30cal, the poly tipped bullets just rock. Now, if we could convince them to make 190gr and heavier poly tipped match bullets, Sierra look out.

Also, the 155gr AMax proved to be the sleeper bullet. Flies 100 to 200fps faster, flatter and equally accurate. Wouldn't be my first choice for LR hunting but for LR varminting/clay shooting, a great bullet.

Sheldon, you are right that BC is such an important marketing factor. I would think that they would want to publish the results. It would be like Chev not telling how much horsepower their Corvette makes because it is higher then a competitive car.

I would not want them to exaggerate but a 25% real world increase in BC over a softpoint is big news. Would increase sales, drive more research and create better bullets. Sounds good to me...

Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-12-2003, 11:33 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Re: A-Max vs. MatchKing

I am with you 100 percent, The day Hornady makes a 225 A-max is the day you see 80 percent of the 220-240 MK market share go bye bye.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-14-2003, 04:25 PM
SPONSOR
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,453
Re: A-Max vs. MatchKing

Has anyone used the 178 grain A-Max on elk?
Or are the MK's better for elk?

Ernie
__________________
Ernie (xphunter)

SEB Coaxial Front Rest - Dealer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCsyjQr0Yrc




"Live your life in such a way that when your feet hit the floor in the morning, Satan shudders and says, "Oh no.........they're awake!""
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: A-Max vs. MatchKing
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.277 dia. 115 gr HPBT MatchKing Spino Reloading 8 06-08-2007 07:04 AM
200gr 8mm matchking ? tomme_boy Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 09-29-2006 10:20 PM
MATCHKING FAILURE! Ian M Long Range Hunting & Shooting 22 11-20-2005 01:07 AM
New .22 Cal Matchking Ian M Reloading 15 03-14-2005 06:02 AM
.30-378, 220 Matchking Nighthawk Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 0 03-27-2002 01:29 PM

Current Poll
Do You Think Slingshots Should Be Legalized For Hunting Brown Bear?
Current Poll - 2
Do you have a high speed Internet connection?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2013 Long Range Hunting, LLC