close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics

Reply

LR or Dots

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 12-06-2008, 11:47 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: southwet wa.
Posts: 20
LR or Dots

I have a 300wsm and a 30-06. I want to have more confidence with shots to 600yds while hunting. I plan to practice alot but will always get closer if I can. Still to have the option would be nice.

In the leupold scopes which would be better to accomplish this.

The LR reticle or Dots??
Can someone explain how these work?

Thanks
__________________
BD



"Thou shall hunt where there are trophy muledeer, or forever be plagued with mediocrity"
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 12-07-2008, 01:21 AM
    SPONSOR
     
    Join Date: Jun 2007
    Location: Wyoming
    Posts: 2,797
    Re: LR or Dots

    I would choose lines/dashes over dots myself.
    I feel I can be more critical with a line.
    I do not have the subtension (distance between the dashes) of the LR reticle, but could get it if you are interested.
    The varmint hunter reticle would also work good in this area.

    I guess before I go any further, which Leupold optic(s) are you considering?

    Once you zero your rig, say at 200 yards, know what your muzzle velocity, ballistic coefficient of your bullet, and the approx elev & temp we put that data into a ballistic software program like Exbal or Sierra's (there is a number of good ones out there), and we will have a fairly accurate drop chart for your gun in those conditions.

    Then once we know what the subtension of the Leupold LR Reticle is, you will know what each dash will zero at (there is two of them) and hten we can also determine how far (subtension) the 2nd dash is from the plex/reticle juncture-Which results in another aiming point.

    Then you go out and see if the drop chart matches your actual results by shooting at those distances.

    This may sound confusing, but it is easier than it sounds.
    Do you have access to a Chronograph?

    A VX-3 4.5-14 with the Varmint Hunter Reticle would be nice and would get you to the distances you want to practice at.

    Last edited by Ernie; 12-07-2008 at 01:25 AM.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 12-07-2008, 02:47 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2007
    Location: Spokane , WA.
    Posts: 186
    Re: LR or Dots

    either are ok... but my pick is the lepould TMR. More detailed than the dots and more useful once you learn how to use it. It can get a little complex but lepould has a "how to" manuel on their site. definately worth a look. Plenty of guys can chime in and tell you in detail how the mils work if you decide thats the way to go.

    good luck.
    __________________
    " People sleep peacably in their bed at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf " - George Orwell

    I am the way I am because I watched the movies "Red Dawn" and "Tremors" at a impressionable age.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 12-07-2008, 04:02 AM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2006
    Location: AB, Canada
    Posts: 556
    Re: LR or Dots

    i owned both, mil and lines.
    the reticle with lines are more easy to aim, and your field of view is bigger than with mildot.

    i like mp-r8, and np-r1 reticles.
    __________________
    Thanks
    CJ
    My 338Edge
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 12-07-2008, 07:09 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: pa
    Posts: 435
    Re: LR or Dots

    check out the shephard scopes
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 12-07-2008, 12:01 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: southwet wa.
    Posts: 20
    Re: LR or Dots

    I have access to a chrony. Currently own several VX-I's which I think don't come with dots. Just the LR retical. I can sell them both and swing for the VX-II. It the VX-II honestly worth another $100??

    Never purched used optics on line before. But I see VX-II's for $230 quite often. I could also go that route?
    __________________
    BD



    "Thou shall hunt where there are trophy muledeer, or forever be plagued with mediocrity"
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 12-07-2008, 12:03 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: southwet wa.
    Posts: 20
    Re: LR or Dots

    Ernie, You refer to "we" several times??

    Thanks for your info and reply
    __________________
    BD



    "Thou shall hunt where there are trophy muledeer, or forever be plagued with mediocrity"
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: LR or Dots
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Using mil dots as a holdover fireroad Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 18 07-29-2009 04:14 PM
    mil-dots should i or not? goose_slayer Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 5 07-27-2009 10:50 PM
    Mil-Dots for ranging? MSU Marksman Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 28 02-25-2009 10:58 AM
    1X scope with mil-dots? RDM416 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 1 07-02-2007 03:19 AM
    Opinions on Mil-dots and IL Nebraska Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 3 08-21-2002 11:42 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC