Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

Hunting scope

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 07-14-2012, 09:21 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,103
Re: Hunting scope

I think what might meet all your expectations is a Zeiss Conquest 6.5-20x50 with the rapid Z 800 or 1000 reticle, zero it at 100 and check to see how close your drops match the hash marks. The Sightron lrmoa reticle is similar as is the Vortex deadhold bdc.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-14-2012, 09:53 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 58
Re: Hunting scope

Some may be your personal preference and some will depend on what and how you are hunting. Are you deer hunting? Are you hunting primarily from a stand or do a fair amount of walking? Are you likely to see game at 100 yards and less, maybe running that you might like to shoot at?

- You don't need a ballistic turret to dial in clicks - you can take caps off the good european scopes and do your clicks if you want (very repeatable). If you were shooting a lot at really long range and many different distances, you'd probably want the ballistic turret. They are big and bulky and get in the way at times if you are are a walking hunter at all. Either way you can dial up and down, but you really would only need that for around 500. You could about aim dead-on for 300+ yards and 10-12" high at 400 - so you'd rarely need to "click" in adjustments

- As backwoods83 mentioned, you could get a ballistic type reticle with a few hash marks to use for longer distances. Just keep in mind, there is almost always some type of compromise - the thinner, more complex reticles are great for different drops, but that can slow you down if all you want to do is quickly aim and shoot, or the thin lines can get lost in real dim conditions unless you have an illuminated reticle. Again, depends on what and how you hunt...

- You could use a "normal" scope and "normal/plex" reticle and again, really only need an aid one the rare occasions you were shooting closer to 500 (hold over, click, use the bottom of the plex reticle etc.)

If you are always on a stand and have lots of time, something like a 6.5-20 may be fine. I walk and hunt too, and sometimes need to be able to quickly acquire an animal running or close up, or in thick timber. I'd never want 6.5x for my min. mangnification. I like at least 3x or 4x so you can "find em" quickly. Also, 20x is nice I guess, especially for prarie dogs etc. but for deer-size game guys have been using 3x9 for many years out to 500. Something like a 3-12, 4-16 etc may be good...depends what you're hunting and how you hunt. My 3-12 is totally adequate out to 700yds+ for larger game.

No offense to any other posters, but when you said BEST - Zeiss Conquest and Sightron aren't it - they are good, but they aren't $2000 Zeiss/Swaro good. I have a Zeiss Conquest on a light-weight hunting rifle and it is good/acceptable. It is NO WHERE NEAR the same quality in looks or feel to it's $2k relatives or my Swaro. It has Zeiss's name on it, and it's good, but you are talking apples and oranges compared to the better 30mm tube models. If you change your description to a "good scope at a good price or trying to save some money" then it's a different story, but none of these $1k and less scopes will hold a candle to those 2x their price in a good european scope. If you have the coin - you won't regret the purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-14-2012, 10:46 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,615
Re: Hunting scope

get a Z6 Swarovski and have the best glass in the world for seeing in the dark if needed. You can get one well under $2000 and have the best. I have two in the box well under that price I could let you have one of those for what I paid for it. If you have the money why not get the best glass out there.
__________________
Predictions are difficult, especially when they involve the future
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-14-2012, 11:05 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 864
Re: Hunting scope

Quote:
Originally Posted by Long Time Long Ranger View Post
get a Z6 Swarovski and have the best glass in the world for seeing in the dark if needed. You can get one well under $2000 and have the best. I have two in the box well under that price I could let you have one of those for what I paid for it. If you have the money why not get the best glass out there.
What power do you have. Never had a swaro scope but sure love there bincs. Ive been kicking around another scope for my carry lr 338 rum. What adjustments do they have on swaro 6?
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-15-2012, 01:20 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,566
Re: Hunting scope

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajuncoonazz View Post
Thanks everyone for yall help. Now do i get one with a ballistic turret r jus set my gun 3in. High(like i been doin)?
Depends on how precise you wish to be.

The ballistic compensating turrets work fairly well, but then so does just holding over/under based on range starting with a zero at 300-400yds.

If you want the max precision get straight MOA turrets with 1/4 MOA adjustments and set your actual click values from your hundred yard zero based on whatever your ballistic calculator or cheat sheet shows.

For quick shots either of the two you are talking about are the best, but for the more precise shots where you have time to actually dope and dial the latter is by far superior.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-15-2012, 06:11 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 418
Re: Hunting scope

Quote:
Originally Posted by Long Time Long Ranger View Post
If you have the money why not get the best glass out there.
Pretty much says it all right there! Not that I'm an expert by any means but it has been my experience that with optics the old saying that "you get what you pay for" has never been more true.
I'm a Leupold fan but they are the best I can afford and most of the time I can't afford those. You can bet if I had the spare change I would be looking hard at the top end euro stuff.

Out to 500 yards I have been using a ballistic reticle with good success, the not an expert comment applies here as well, just a beginner so take it for what it is worth.

Good luck!

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-15-2012, 03:40 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 22
Re: Hunting scope

Thanks again everyone yall opnions been very helpful i guess when it comes down to it sounds like to each his own.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Hunting scope
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hunting Scope Cajuncoonazz Long Range Hunting & Shooting 4 07-13-2012 11:38 PM
Hunting Scope 65Jeffrey Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 5 08-18-2011 11:12 AM
Hunting scope for a .300 WSM BallisticNut Deer Hunting 0 04-06-2011 10:59 AM
Hunting scope help.. emmagator Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 5 12-03-2010 05:15 PM
Hunting Scope Jim Hundley Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 13 08-29-2005 11:48 AM

Current Poll
Spot & Stalk or Ambush For Western Deer?
MOSTLY - Spot & Stalk - 73.62%
1,010 Vote
MOSTLY - Ambush - 26.38%
362 Votes
Total Votes: 1,372
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC