Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

FFP worth extra cost?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-08-2010, 10:24 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sturgis, MI
Posts: 736
FFP worth extra cost?

Is FFP worth an extra $150? I would mainly use for wind hold off. Looking at Vortex viper pst 6-24x50
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-08-2010, 10:49 AM
SPONSOR
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,677
Re: FFP worth extra cost?

IT all depends if you will remember to take the scope to the calibrated point each time when you shoot.
For field shooting, tactical matches and hunting I prefer FFP because it makes my system more idiot proof.
So for me-Yes. FFP is worth it.

For BR matches, and pd'ing I would rather have SFP.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2010, 12:13 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sturgis, MI
Posts: 736
Re: FFP worth extra cost?

Thanks thats what I was thinking. I just keep reading and reading reviews on scopes. I am really torn between one mentioned in original post huskeman and zeiss conquest.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2010, 09:17 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 2,625
Re: FFP worth extra cost?

i gotta tell you, i just don't see what the big deal is with FFP scopes. for a hunting scope, a SFP is the winner hands down. the only thing, and i repeat, the ONLY thing a FFP scope can do better than a SFP is range on any power.with that said, a ranging reticle is a BACKUP system in case your rangefinder isn't working. most SFP scopes are set up to range on the highest power. now in my experience, it doesn't take very long to put a scope on the highest power, and wahlah, you can range. in my limited experience with ranging using the reticle, i like it on the highest magnification.the closer the view, the more accurate the estimating is.
the disadvantages are huge. in low light situations, when you turn the power to it's lower/lowest setting, the reticle becomes very thin. not what you need for low light. a very bold/heavy crosshair is what you need.
now let's shoot something at long range where you put it on it's highest power. DANG, the reticle is now very heavy. sure would be nice to have that fine crosshair for that long shot, but no, a FFP reticle is very thick on it's highest setting.
in my mind, i'll take a SFP scope every time, for a hunting gun, especially when we're shooting a little farther than most. the disadvantages far outweigh the one advantage that a FFP scope has.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2010, 03:55 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 1,091
Re: FFP worth extra cost?

Why is it people who dislike FFP reticles (and usually have zero experience with them) seem to believe, without fail, that the absolutely only thing a reticle can be used for is "ranging?" Virtually none of us use our reticles for that in the field. But we do use them for other things. Like hitting the target.

It's like they have not found much use for their SFP reticles in the field so they don't use them for much of anything...so they never learn the advantages of using a reticle and it becomes self-fulfilling. Since they don't use their reticles for anything, being able to use the reticle adds no value. Of course if you can use the reticle on more than one power it suddenly becomes much more useful in the field.

So yes, if you don't ever plan on using the reticle for anyting--holdovers, wind holds, etc,--SFP works great. If you do plan on using the reticle for things, FFP is well worth it.

The "disadvantages" people with little experience list are easily negated by selecting the correct reticle for your application in a high quality scope.

Once you actually extensively use a good one (assuming you "use the reticle" for anything) the choice becomes a no-brainer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2010, 07:38 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sturgis, MI
Posts: 736
Re: FFP worth extra cost?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon A View Post
Why is it people who dislike FFP reticles (and usually have zero experience with them) seem to believe, without fail, that the absolutely only thing a reticle can be used for is "ranging?" Virtually none of us use our reticles for that in the field. But we do use them for other things. Like hitting the target.

It's like they have not found much use for their SFP reticles in the field so they don't use them for much of anything...so they never learn the advantages of using a reticle and it becomes self-fulfilling. Since they don't use their reticles for anything, being able to use the reticle adds no value. Of course if you can use the reticle on more than one power it suddenly becomes much more useful in the field.

So yes, if you don't ever plan on using the reticle for anyting--holdovers, wind holds, etc,--SFP works great. If you do plan on using the reticle for things, FFP is well worth it.

The "disadvantages" people with little experience list are easily negated by selecting the correct reticle for your application in a high quality scope.

Once you actually extensively use a good one (assuming you "use the reticle" for anything) the choice becomes a no-brainer.
Thanks I was planning for using it for hold over for my windage.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-2010, 09:31 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,100
Re: FFP worth extra cost?

Answer to the question: YOU BETCHA!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: FFP worth extra cost?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it worth the extra money? Tikkamike Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 3 07-26-2011 06:55 PM
.280 Rem to .280 AI - worth the cost to rebarrel? sharktown Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 10 10-26-2010 08:30 PM
Redding Type "S" dies, are they worth the extra money? Idaho Sawyer Reloading 24 02-11-2010 07:35 PM
us optic rings base are they worth the extra $ tjonh2001 Equipment Discussions 3 12-07-2007 09:51 AM
300 Weatherby vs. 300 Ultra, is the gain worth the cost? DanielLudwig Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 20 11-05-2005 09:38 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 34.32%
116 Votes
NO - 48.52%
164 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 17.16%
58 Votes
Total Votes: 338
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC