close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics

Reply

? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 11-29-2004, 10:22 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5
? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

Ok guys, I am thinking of a new rifle (having bowhunted only for the last decade). I got great info from a prior post and just scanning through prior threads.

My question is what is the downside of a light weight rifle if its only purpose is "long range" hunting. I know that a heavier rifle offers a more stable platform for benchrest shooting. And, a heavier barrel handles the heat of multiple shots better.

But it would obviously be nicer to carry a lighter rifle over hill and dale. Hopefully, we are only talking about 1 shot [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] , so we do not need to shoot rapid groups.

So, if 2 rifle both shoot 0.5" groups, why not use the light weight rifle for hunting?
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 11-29-2004, 10:32 AM
     
    Posts: n/a
    Re: ? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

    My favorite thing about heavier rifles is the reduction of recoil without a muzzle brake.

    I shoot a 7 STW and a 338 Lapua so I like them heavy.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 11-29-2004, 10:38 AM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2004
    Posts: 5
    Re: ? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

    John,

    What about a removable muzzle brake? Use it while working up loads, sighting in, etc...., then remove it for hunting. I have not done this, so I certainly cannot speak from experience.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 11-29-2004, 01:16 PM
     
    Posts: n/a
    Re: ? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

    JRB, I have never used a brake so I can not comment. I'm also 6'3" and over 250 so carrying a a 12 lb rifle vs a 8 lb isnt all that much different to me.

    Your mileage may vary....
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 11-30-2004, 12:18 AM
    Writers Guild
     
    Join Date: Jul 2001
    Posts: 1,459
    Re: ? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

    My new rifle is a Savage 110 in 270. This will be my walkabout hunting rifle and will certainly shoot accurately as far as the cartridge is effective.

    At 6.5lbs w/o scope, it qualifies as light. Recoil, or rather the speed of the recoil, is much higher. Scope rash is certaily a possibility so I have to adjust. Maybe even looking at a scope with more eye relief.

    I believe that if I will be shooting off field rests, the max. distance is much closer then off a bench. Weight will not add more in stability from the rests I use. Neither will a heavier barrel as I don't intend to need more then the number of shots in my mag.

    I have had several heavy walkabout rifles and didn't walk as far as I might have given a lighter rifle. This rifle ought to fit that need quite nicely.

    Jerry

    PS the rifle shoots 4 into 1/4" so will certainly suit my LR needs. Time to start testing at longer ranges and see how it holds together
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 11-30-2004, 02:11 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2003
    Location: La Grange, TX
    Posts: 222
    Re: ? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

    Load development with a brake on and zeroing vs taking the brake off to hunt with is a waste. You change vibration patterns, nodes etc..... Do either one or the other. You really can't have it both ways unless you get that one in a thousand barrel combo.

    Jeff
    __________________
    Get as close as you can, but utilize your skills as needed.
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 11-30-2004, 06:51 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2001
    Posts: 107
    Re: ? Downside to Lightweight Rifle

    jrb co - I find that for myself, accurately shooting a light rifle at long range is much, much more difficult then it is for a heavier rifle. For example: my AI/AWM with scope and mag, probably weighs in somewhere around 17 - 18 lbs. Just perfect. Sets up real nice for very long shots. I usually like my precision rifles to weight about somewheres in the range of 15 - 25 lbs. Rifles in this weight class I can shoot very sub-MOA.

    However, if I take my Win Model 70 in 243 in one of them light McMillian stocks, well I just have a hell of a time holding under 1.5 inch groups at 100 yrds. Additionally one very disturbing thing I've noticed when I shoot light rifles, is there is the occasional highly significant flier; I mean more then 2 inches off from where I was aiming. It's not the gun, it's me. I mean when shooting a light rifle, if you just blink wrong, you're gonna throw your shot.

    The down side to heavier rifles for field use is just that; heavier. However if you've put time, money and effort into a hunt, then you just absolutely cannot tolerate poor accuracy; especially for long range shootin. Just my $.02
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: ? Downside to Lightweight Rifle
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    lightweight rifle action alled12 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 9 11-02-2013 08:13 PM
    Is there any Downside to a 40* Shoulder ? 300magman Reloading 11 07-09-2011 12:58 PM
    Savage Lightweight Rifle silvertip-co Long Range Hunting & Shooting 3 04-11-2011 12:01 PM
    Best Lightweight Rifle under $2,000? bvolcic Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 24 11-22-2010 04:29 PM
    Options for "lightweight" rifle timl General Discussion 1 04-06-2007 07:41 AM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC