LongRangeHunting.com



Go Back   LongRangeHunting.com > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Home Forums Articles Product Reviews Outdoor News Outdoor Tips Rules & FAQ Member Map Register Mark Forums Read

Welcome, Guest! Please Register or Login:

  

Members have access to more features, including search and "New Posts". It's free, what are you waiting for?
Reply

buck @ 406, doe @ 689

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: colorado
Posts: 390
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

RDM416,

Excellent sir. Thank you very much. How do you like the optics on the Nightforce compared to your Swarovski? which Swaro's did you have? How do you like the Nightforce rings? Thanks again!
Reply With Quote

  #16  
Old 12-17-2005, 07:40 PM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Bend, Oregon
Posts: 575
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

Beautiful rifle. How about a closeup of that fine action and another where the claiber is "stamped" on the barrel. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Man the Kirby does some nice work!
__________________
NRA Life Member
I don't fear freebore.
300Wby Accumark, works for me.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-17-2005, 10:37 PM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Searcy, Arkansas
Posts: 181
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

Hired gun and Boman,

Hired gun, here are the pics you requested.





Boman, I have two swarovski scopes, a 6X-24X 50mm, and 4X-16X 50mm. Both have TDS reticles. I have had the 4-16 for several years and the 6-24 for a little over a year. Both are fine scopes and I have been very pleased with them.

The main reason for my switch to NF is the target turrets and NF reputation for precise "dial up and return to 0". Since I started dialing up for elevation, I don't want to go back to using multi-range reticles.

I have not spent a great deal of time comparing the two side by side optically, but it seems like the NF may be just a little brighter in low light. However the comparison is not really fair to the swaro since they are 50mm and the NF is 56mm.

The other thing I like better about the NF is the side parallax adjustment. The front adjustment is almost impossible to do with swaro while looking throught the scope with the rifle shouldered.

As far as the NF lightweight rings, "perfect" [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-19-2005, 08:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: colorado
Posts: 390
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

RDM416,
Thanks for the info. I understand about the Swaro scopes and the dialing in. I too have a Swarovski but its the 1" 4-12x50 with the TDS. Thanks again on the Nightforce info.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2007 LenBackus.net, LLC