Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

buck @ 406, doe @ 689

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:01 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: colorado
Posts: 928
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

RDM416,

Excellent sir. Thank you very much. How do you like the optics on the Nightforce compared to your Swarovski? which Swaro's did you have? How do you like the Nightforce rings? Thanks again!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-17-2005, 07:40 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Bend, Oregon
Posts: 1,266
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

Beautiful rifle. How about a closeup of that fine action and another where the claiber is "stamped" on the barrel. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Man the Kirby does some nice work!
__________________
Build a man a fire and you heat him for a day.
Set him on fire and you heat him for life.

Only accurate rifles are interesting.

Gordy and Brady.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-17-2005, 10:37 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Searcy, Arkansas
Posts: 700
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

Hired gun and Boman,

Hired gun, here are the pics you requested.





Boman, I have two swarovski scopes, a 6X-24X 50mm, and 4X-16X 50mm. Both have TDS reticles. I have had the 4-16 for several years and the 6-24 for a little over a year. Both are fine scopes and I have been very pleased with them.

The main reason for my switch to NF is the target turrets and NF reputation for precise "dial up and return to 0". Since I started dialing up for elevation, I don't want to go back to using multi-range reticles.

I have not spent a great deal of time comparing the two side by side optically, but it seems like the NF may be just a little brighter in low light. However the comparison is not really fair to the swaro since they are 50mm and the NF is 56mm.

The other thing I like better about the NF is the side parallax adjustment. The front adjustment is almost impossible to do with swaro while looking throught the scope with the rifle shouldered.

As far as the NF lightweight rings, "perfect" [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-19-2005, 08:53 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: colorado
Posts: 928
Re: buck @ 406, doe @ 689

RDM416,
Thanks for the info. I understand about the Swaro scopes and the dialing in. I too have a Swarovski but its the 1" 4-12x50 with the TDS. Thanks again on the Nightforce info.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: buck @ 406, doe @ 689
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Buck younggun Antelope Hunting 5 10-10-2010 04:18 PM
745 PA Buck Kevin Cram Deer Hunting 14 12-14-2008 05:31 PM
My 07 Buck tsmiller4 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 11-20-2007 04:14 PM
last day buck. longgunshooter Long Range Hunting & Shooting 7 10-31-2006 12:38 PM
First buck of '05 DanielLudwig Long Range Hunting & Shooting 0 11-21-2005 09:14 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC