Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-07-2004, 06:24 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Aussie in Italy
Posts: 276
Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

has anyone had any experiences with the 168gn TSX in .30cal?

I just ordered a box and am curious as I've heard good things about them, but nothing specific.

[ 02-08-2004: Message edited by: EXPRESS ]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-2004, 06:33 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sask. Canada
Posts: 2,410
Re: Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

The XLC is the first Barnes bullet manufactured to match tolerances, this was to meet a military contract I believe. I happened to have been on one of the first Long Range shooting tests of the new bullet with the owners of Barnes a few years back. Story is in their manual.

We have killed several animals with the bullet and it performs very well. You will be able to use slightly more powder than a standard "X" bullet load, and you can also get slightly faster velocities. In a .308 the mushrooming capability is very good out to 500 yards, but the bullet starts to poop out at 600 as far as opening up goes.

We went with an almost case full of Varget, work up from 45 gr.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2004, 09:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jamestown, ND
Posts: 20
Re: Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

I could not get the xlc bullets to shoot good. I have .3 to .4 inch groups with the standard X and the tripple shocks, but I can't get good accuracy with the xlc. They group about 1.5 inches at 100 yards. I tried them in a 300 Win Mag, 300 WSM, and a Remingron 700P in 308.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2004, 06:41 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Aussie in Italy
Posts: 276
Re: Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

sorry guys, a moment of confusion. I meant the TSX bullets, the tripple shocks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2004, 09:00 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sask. Canada
Posts: 2,410
Re: Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

We find that the Triple Shock bullets require even a bit more powder than the XLC's in the rifle that we tested with. One consideration is that you need lots of neck tension, we were shooting compressed loads and the bullets were slipping outward a bit.
Accuracy is excellent, right at or under 0.5" in the Mike Rock barrel we use. Velocities are just a bit higher than standard X bullets. We killed several deer and did not recover any bullets but the exits were significant (2-3") and lots of internal damage. Longest kill was 710 yards on a mulie doe.

Here are some actual drops - there are a couple of wonkie numbers but this is what we got when we fired the bullets previous to a hunt.

First numbers are distance, second is actual drop, third is inches of drop from the previous distance. We rounded this off a bit and made a MOA drop chart and he killed deer very nicely with this info. Can't explain the 575 number, guess the bullet floats upward a bit at that distance [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
Accuracy was exceptional during this test, we shot three-shot groups and the rifle stayed right at 1/2 moa, except at 625 where the group was under 1.5". Charge was Varget, BHA brass, Win. primers, O.L. 2.830"

100 0 0
200 2.25 2.25
250 7.75 5.50
300 12.5 4.75
350 19.5 7.00
375 24.5 5.00
400 28.25 3.75
425 33.25 5.00
450 39.5 6.25
475 45.25 5.75
500 51.5 6.25
525 60.5 9.00
550 71.75 11.25
575 75.75 4.00
600 83.25 7.50
625 91.5 7.75
650 108.00 16.50
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2004, 10:44 AM
Writers Guild
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,459
Re: Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

Unfortunately, my experience with those bullets was poor. In my Gibbs which routinely shoots 1/3 MOA at 180yds, the Barnes triple shock had a tough time staying in a 6" group.

This is one rifle which those bullets definitely did not like.

I would like the thank IanM again for generously giving me some to test. I wished the results had been better.

On the flip side, the Nosler Accubonds in 200gr and Hornady 165gr Interbond both shot spectacular groups in my Gibbs and RUM. I can certainly recommend both bullets for LR hunting.

Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-2004, 04:21 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?

In my tests with the 168gr Barnes Triple Shock I had groups under 1/2.
Excellent velocity and accuracy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Barnes 168gn TSX NOT XLC?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Federal Gold Medal Match .308 168gn Uncle Z Other Stuff For Sale 2 06-19-2010 01:34 PM
ANYONE got Berger 7mm 168gn HUNTING bullets? EXPRESS Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 05-24-2010 11:33 AM
Barnes 200 gr 308 tsx robbor Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 0 08-06-2008 06:47 AM
168gn Berger/7 Mag johnnyk Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 4 12-03-2007 08:43 AM
7mm Rem Mag. and 168gn SMK johnnyk Reloading 4 01-27-2007 08:55 AM

Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.96%
1,531 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.12%
1,894 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.08%
1,361 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.01%
590 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.92%
231 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.92%
290 Votes
Total Votes: 5,897
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC