Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 10-10-2012, 12:55 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 889
Re: Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by orkan View Post
You're entitled to do it whichever way you prefer, but having different zeros for different applications makes no sense to me, unless I'm dealing with rimfire.

You're right, this is long range hunting. It's more important to me to hit an animal where I want to, than a target at a tactical match. As such, I want every bit of precision and accuracy afforded me by the equipment I'm using. To admit that its appropriate for a tactical match where utmost precision and accuracy is warranted, but somehow not appropriate for hunting is... well I don't know what it is. There's a word for it I'm sure. ;)

Mentally, the aspect of holding "under" for closer shots introduces a variable that otherwise wouldn't have to be there. With my 338LM, I would have to hold under nearly a full mil at 100yds if I set a 300yd zero. That isn't a small amount. While that is only 3.5" and in theory will not matter at 100yds, it is not something I'm willing to accept as "good enough." Anyhow, I'm sure you've heard both sides of the argument and are intelligent enough to do it whichever way you see fit. I'm just expounding on what I see to be flawed logic. If you agree its more precise and will work better for a precision rifle match... why is it not adequate for long range hunting? After all, inside of 400yds doesn't really meet the definition of long range hunting does it?
"Flawed logic".."good enough". First off, 99% of my shooting is NON-TACTIAL, so your Idea that I have two different zeros is hogwash. I shoot 1 tac mach a year. Second, this is LR hunting, but, like most of the people who post here, MOST of the game opprotunitys are not considered long range. I have taken deer out past 1K several times, 800 to 1K even more. But the majority of the big game we take is under 400 yards. I would bet that this is true with most of the people who post here, unless they are making LR hunting vid's. "Good enough"...the deer dosn't care weather I center punched the heart or just took out two ventricals...dead is dead....dead on arival.

And, If I need to be "sergical" at short range....I dial DOWN. Or use the reticle to hold under.

Also, with a pumkin thrower like 338L you would need to zero at 100.....3.5 inches high at 100? I am no where near 3.5" high at 100 with a 300 yard zero, so "hold under" in normal hunting situations is moot...it don't happen.

How -N-L did we get here from the OP?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-10-2012, 12:59 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Huron, SD
Posts: 306
Re: Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4xforfun View Post
How -N-L did we get here from the OP?
That's the easiest question. I'm a fan of 100yd zero's, you aren't... so I decided to pick on you about it. ;)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-10-2012, 06:52 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,117
Re: Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION

Is one of you saying that it makes a difference to "Shooter" when zeroing @ 300 vs 100?

I zero my ELR rifle @ 300 and everything else @ 200. Am I in some way confusing "Shooter?"
__________________
I may be the slowest guy on the mountain . . . . but . . . . I'm on the mountain!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-10-2012, 06:57 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Huron, SD
Posts: 306
Re: Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by royinidaho View Post
I zero my ELR rifle @ 300 and everything else @ 200. Am I in some way confusing "Shooter?"
No, just yourself... when time or pressure are introduced. ;)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-11-2012, 08:03 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,117
Re: Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by orkan View Post
No, just yourself... when time or pressure are introduced. ;)
Roger that!
__________________
I may be the slowest guy on the mountain . . . . but . . . . I'm on the mountain!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-13-2012, 10:58 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: ALABAMA
Posts: 130
Re: Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION

Quote:
Originally Posted by orkan View Post
That's the easiest question. I'm a fan of 100yd zero's, you aren't... so I decided to pick on you about it. ;)
ME TO !! I shoot a lot of my deer in the head if possible dont waste no meat if not heart so i dont have to hold under i shoot 7mm mag and need it dead on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Another "SHOOTER" QUESTION
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Field test of "Shooter" for Androids nheninge Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 26 01-19-2014 03:13 PM
"Shooter" for the androids. BobbyL Equipment Discussions 29 10-04-2013 09:23 PM
"Shooter" for Android Table Question Good Long Range Hunting & Shooting 25 01-24-2012 11:07 PM
Black Gun "Shooter" Rant dig General Discussion 9 12-29-2011 09:23 PM
Seattle area hunter/shooter says "Hey!" BallisticNut Member Introductions 3 12-09-2010 05:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC