close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics

Reply

6.5 versus 7mm

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 08-24-2011, 05:32 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 29
6.5 versus 7mm

I am thinking of building a long range hunting rifle.It would be used on Elk,Mule deer ,antelope,whitetails etc.I am looking at either a 6.5 weatherby or a 7 mm weatherby.In the 6.5 140 gr bullets would be used.In the 7mm 168gr bullets would be used.Which one would you go with and why? I have used the 7mm on game but never the 6.5.How would it do on game the size of elk at long range? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 08-24-2011, 05:36 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2009
    Location: Weiser, Idaho
    Posts: 1,202
    Re: 6.5 versus 7mm

    7mm hands down for Elk
    __________________
    Every man needs a good woman, good dog, good horse and a good gun.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 08-24-2011, 06:01 PM
    Official LRH Sponsor
     
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: N. Texas and S. Africa
    Posts: 7,299
    Re: 6.5 versus 7mm

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ks270 View Post
    I am thinking of building a long range hunting rifle.It would be used on Elk,Mule deer ,antelope,whitetails etc.I am looking at either a 6.5 weatherby or a 7 mm weatherby.In the 6.5 140 gr bullets would be used.In the 7mm 168gr bullets would be used.Which one would you go with and why? I have used the 7mm on game but never the 6.5.How would it do on game the size of elk at long range? Thanks
    Well I'd avoid the weatherby calibers just because both factory ammo and brass are going to be much higher than with standard calibers.

    What is your maximum range?

    I'd always go for the heavier 7mm due to better ballistic coefficient in a magnum if you're reaching beyond 750yds.

    If not, I'd look to something along the lines of the .260 Rem, .6.5 Rem Mag, or 6.5x284.

    Of course I shoot bobcats and coyotes with a 7mm STW and just bought a 300 RUM, but for an everyday plinker/varmint/deer rifle I built an AR LR-260.

    I'm comfortable with all of the above out to 1000yds on coyotes and smaller game but limit myself to the 7mm STW and 300Rum for the big stuff at those ranges.

    I wouldn't hesitate for a second or think twice though about any of the .264/6.5's for even elk at 750 or less.

    Largely what your limits are, will be set by your own skill and confidence levels.
    __________________
    Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 08-24-2011, 06:42 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2007
    Posts: 29
    Re: 6.5 versus 7mm

    800 yards would be the limit and I would like to be a lot closer.
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 08-24-2011, 06:53 PM
    Official LRH Sponsor
     
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: N. Texas and S. Africa
    Posts: 7,299
    Re: 6.5 versus 7mm

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ks270 View Post
    800 yards would be the limit and I would like to be a lot closer.
    If you can shoot sub MOA at 800yds, then the 6.5 is adequate.

    I left off .264 WM and .264 STW ... Not sure why but both are phenomenal long range 6.5's. Of course the 6.5 STW is a wildcat and you'll spend a considerable bit of time getting your brass right. Both still considerably cheaper to shoot though than the Weatherby.

    If you just want to go a little bigger and stay with the 7's and 6.5's the 7mm RUM is certainly worth the look.

    If you develop your skills a little then even elk out to 1,200yds wouldn't be at all unreasonable.
    __________________
    Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.

    Last edited by WildRose; 08-25-2011 at 01:17 PM. Reason: freak'n typos
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 08-24-2011, 07:16 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Location: N.W. Texas
    Posts: 197
    Re: 6.5 versus 7mm

    I have a 6.5-284 with 140s and a 284 for the 168s and 180s, and agree with WILDROSE 100% on all points. It's just opinion but I dislike the magnum cases. My 25 inch 284 will push 180 vlds at 2950fps on 51.5gr powder, why burn 20gr more for 150 fps. The 6.5 does 2970 with 140s and is much more fun to shoot and I can spot hits without a muzzel break; but the 180 vld from the 284 has a LOT more pop past 600 yards.
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 08-24-2011, 07:41 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2011
    Location: Spokane, WA
    Posts: 3,715
    Re: 6.5 versus 7mm

    Given the 2 choices-the 7mm. I also don't think it matters a great deal all the other things being equal. Some good options pointed out by others.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: 6.5 versus 7mm
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    338-378 Versus 338 Rum Quigley_Sharps The Basics, Starting Out 20 04-02-2015 09:15 AM
    300 wsm versus 300 winmag Strong Bowman Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 26 11-08-2014 08:49 AM
    .243 versus Swede Teutonic Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 5 10-09-2007 05:00 PM
    7mm BR versus 7-30 Waters 7ultra Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 9 03-07-2005 08:30 PM
    338 Lapua versus 338 RUM JonCole Long Range Hunting & Shooting 24 04-26-2004 03:10 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC