Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

.308 AccuBond 165 vs Sierra 168 SMK

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2008, 10:58 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central, KY
Posts: 336
.308 AccuBond 165 vs Sierra 168 SMK

I'm just about to begin loading up some loads for my new Remington 700P .308

I was wanting to know which bullet would be the best choice for targets out to 500 yards. First and foremost I want the most accurate load possible. I plan on using Varget powder and possibly Lapua brass and Winchester primers.

Secondly if the smks are the choice for the most accurate will they work for hunting whitetails out to 300 or 400 yards?
__________________
Thanks,
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2008, 04:25 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,499
The Accubonds are great but not quite as accurate as the Match King
because of the thinner jacket on the MK.

There are a lot of great hunting bullets and in some rifles/pistols
they may shoot as well but as a rule the match grade bullets
will out perform hunting bullets and for the same weight have a
better BC.

J E CUSTOM
__________________
"PRESS ON"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2008, 05:59 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 254
Well, this may not help, but I'll venture out from my quiet corner...

I just finished developing loads for a Remington 700 STS (very similar to the "P") in .308. I found the SMKs to be stellar, well under .5 MOA out to my 300 yard range. Mind you, I'm not physically capable of shooting better than that at that range, not with a light rifle.

But the lighter Accubonds were not far behind, well under 1 MOA. But the180 gr Accubonds were pushing down to below .5 MOA, even though it was the end of the shooting day for me (I can't shoot even .308's more than 50-60 rounds anymore, before my accuracy tanks).
__________________
NRA Life Member
Safari Club Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2008, 06:39 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MS
Posts: 1,652
I know you didnt ask about the 168 berger vlds, but they would be my choice for accuracy and performance on game.
__________________
I admit that I know just enough to be dangerous.....but dangerous at ever extending distances.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: .308 AccuBond 165 vs Sierra 168 SMK
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
whats the difference between Winchester Accubond and Nosler Accubond? matt_3479 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 06-29-2011 03:30 PM
200gr. Accubond vs. 200gr. Sierra Game King: 300 Win Mag Magnum61 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 6 01-22-2010 01:10 AM
300 win mag and 165 accubond? 300stw Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 12-05-2006 08:37 AM
rl 25/300 win mag/200 mk-accubond?????????? 30-06 boy Reloading 2 08-07-2006 02:04 PM
SMK vs. AccuBond lerch Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 16 03-17-2006 08:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC