Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Poll: Better off using a 300 RUM or 7mm 180 bergers at 3000 fps
Poll Options
Better off using a 300 RUM or 7mm 180 bergers at 3000 fps

Reply

300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2011, 12:05 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 651
300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

So here is the conundrum I'm having. I am almost completely sold on building a 300 RUM but Im having some resevations. My hunting situations are this... Mostly deer hunting at ranges from 100 yards out to 800+ maybe further, the terrian allows for farther but who knows how long it will take me to be proficient out this far. I am starting to elk hunt now and will be hunting the same terrian as there are both deer and elk in the areas I hunt so distances the same. Throw black bear in there as well as I saw some of those this year as well. My rifle build will have a sendero or slightly lighter contour. Im feeling strongly about having a 26" barrel + muzzlebreak (painkiller or DE not sure yet) so whatever that finishes at. My main concern is that hopefully most of my shots will be inside 300-600 yards and I was concerned about the 300 RUM using 210 or 230 bergers would cause massive meat loss. Is this a valid concern or will there not be much difference between these 30 cal 210/230 vs the 180 7mm? Im expecting to get 2850 fps with the 230 and around 3000 fps using the 210 out of the 300 RUM, hopefully that sounds right. I got my first longrange kill (well to me) in this area this year at 352 yards and Im hooked on getting out further if the situation calls for it. So the main question I need input on is will this 300 RUM cause measurably more meat loss compared to an equal shot with the 7mm 180? and really concerend when those shots are in the 100-400 yard range. Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2011, 12:14 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,763
Re: 300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyroducksx3 View Post
So here is the conundrum I'm having. I am almost completely sold on building a 300 RUM but Im having some resevations. My hunting situations are this... Mostly deer hunting at ranges from 100 yards out to 800+ maybe further, the terrian allows for farther but who knows how long it will take me to be proficient out this far. I am starting to elk hunt now and will be hunting the same terrian as there are both deer and elk in the areas I hunt so distances the same. Throw black bear in there as well as I saw some of those this year as well. My rifle build will have a sendero or slightly lighter contour. Im feeling strongly about having a 26" barrel + muzzlebreak (painkiller or DE not sure yet) so whatever that finishes at. My main concern is that hopefully most of my shots will be inside 300-600 yards and I was concerned about the 300 RUM using 210 or 230 bergers would cause massive meat loss. Is this a valid concern or will there not be much difference between these 30 cal 210/230 vs the 180 7mm? Im expecting to get 2850 fps with the 230 and around 3000 fps using the 210 out of the 300 RUM, hopefully that sounds right. I got my first longrange kill (well to me) in this area this year at 352 yards and Im hooked on getting out further if the situation calls for it. So the main question I need input on is will this 300 RUM cause measurably more meat loss compared to an equal shot with the 7mm 180? and really concerend when those shots are in the 100-400 yard range. Thank you
The heavier slower bullet is going to give you less meat loss not more.

The lighter and faster bullets (comparing the same make bullet in different weights) is going to give you more expansion and greater hyperstatic effect than the faster/heavier bullet.

In my .300 Rum I'm going to shoot the 180gr Scirocco's at around 3,300fps at everything from deer sized game up.

I might try some of the 165's though for a long range varmint load since I'm not hunting for pelts but shooting predators for control purposes.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2011, 12:15 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,763
Re: 300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

As for the 7mm I see no reason at all to shoot 180's in one at anything smaller than Elk.

I love the performance of the 140's and 150's in both the 7mm Mag and 7MM STW
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2011, 12:33 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 651
Re: 300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
As for the 7mm I see no reason at all to shoot 180's in one at anything smaller than Elk.

I love the performance of the 140's and 150's in both the 7mm Mag and 7MM STW
I agree with this but elk are in the equation and I only want one bullet to worry about zero and drop charts. I am shooting a 168 berger now out of my 7 mag , which will be the donor action, but Im a little concerned that they aren't enough for the elk out past 650 or so. I'll be hunting deer every year for the high hunt and if not succesfull the regular season and elk hopefully every year but certainly every other year. So I'll actually get less meat damage using the 300 RUM 210/230 than a 7 RM/STW pushing the 180 bergers. Thats potentially good news. P.S. I found the sciracco bullets bearing surface to be wildely inconsistant from box to box using the 150 7mm just fyi

Last edited by pyroducksx3; 11-02-2011 at 12:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2011, 12:39 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Townsend MT
Posts: 70
Re: 300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

meat loss is going to be directly related to shot placement regardless.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2011, 12:42 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,763
Re: 300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyroducksx3 View Post
I agree with this but elk are in the equation and I only want one bullet to worry about zero and drop charts. I am shooting a 168 berger now out of my 7 mag will be the donor action but Im a little concerned that they aren't enough for the elk out past 650 or so. I'll be hunting deer every year for the high hunt and if not succesfull the regular season and elk hopefully every year but certainly every other year. So I'll actually get less meat damage using the 300 RUM 210/230 than a 7 RM/STW pushing the 180 bergers. Thats potentially good news
I wouldn't hesitate at all with the 180's from the 300 Rum or 150's from the 7mm STW even on elk.

An Elk is no where near to being as densely bodied as a big hog and they don't have the cartilage sheild in the shoulder/chest that a big boar does.

I've killed literally dozens of boars over 500lbs with 140gr Nosler Ballistic tips and Hornady interlock and interbond with both the 7mag and 7STW.

The one big hog I've shot so far with the 300 Rum and the 180gr Scirocco was a straight through and through through both shoulders and it had a nice exit not much bigger than a quarter. He was somewhere between 700-800lbs.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2011, 12:45 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halfway between Lubbock and Dallas
Posts: 4,763
Re: 300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps

Quote:
Originally Posted by bearpaw View Post
meat loss is going to be directly related to shot placement regardless.
True to an extent. However with the same impact point the amount of damage is going to be directly related to velocity and bullet type.

Higher velocity= more expansion, greater hyperstatic shock, and bigger exit hole.
__________________
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 300 RUM or 7mm with 180 bergers at 3000 fps
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTT: 168gr Bergers for 180gr Bergers longrange.270 Reloading Equipment and Components 0 07-31-2009 09:29 PM
Ssg 3000 Fumedo Gun Photos 3 05-10-2008 11:30 AM
Rem 700 SA 250/3000 AI EddieHarren Guns For Sale 0 02-15-2008 12:49 PM
B&L 3000 toddconley Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 0 12-04-2006 08:59 AM
22-3000 help! 6.5 Bandit General Discussion 4 03-07-2004 09:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC