close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics

Reply

.270 bullet

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 10-28-2013, 03:54 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 14
.270 bullet

Setting up two rifles for 5 to 600 yard shots for deer. One is a pre 64 Winchester and the other is a Husqvarna in .270. Looking at the Noser Accu bond in 130 grain. Would like to hear some other options for bullets.
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 10-28-2013, 05:10 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2004
    Location: OHIO
    Posts: 2,417
    Re: .270 bullet

    150 Berger VLD
    130 gr Barnes TTSX/TSX
    130 Swift Scirocco
    Any of the ballistic tips
    165 Matrix
    __________________
    Derek M.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 10-28-2013, 05:36 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
    Posts: 8,859
    Re: .270 bullet

    I'm a 270 Win nut and have been shooting the cartridge for longer than a 45 year old person has lived. I'm also a knot head and opinionated. Most of what I say is pure fact. . . except for what isn't.

    Back in the day, long prior to the LRH bug, the 130 grain offerings were the goto bullet. About 400 yards was the limit for distance. I was using a Leuy 3-9 VX-II with duplex reticle.

    Along comes the LRH bug. Switched to a quality LRH scope. Found it necessary to go with 140 class bullets. bc of 140 were better than 130's and it showed in the shooting.

    Anything Nosler and Hornaday BTSPs shot lights out as do Berger 140s.

    A good scope with proper reticle for hold over and/or accurate clicks brings the Winnie well beyond a 600 yard deer getter.

    I suppose the 150 BT would do well but I as much as practicable I try not to shoot rainbows.

    The only "con" with the Hornady BTSP is deformation of the lead tip in the magazine. Doesn't seem to affect much other than cosmetics.
    __________________
    I may be the slowest guy on the mountain . . . . but . . . . I'm on the mountain!
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 10-28-2013, 07:09 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: Colorado
    Posts: 14
    Re: .270 bullet

    Thank you Roy. Just the type of information I'm looking for!
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 10-28-2013, 10:04 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2009
    Posts: 223
    Re: .270 bullet

    Been shooting the 140gr berger for a few years now with good results. I found it to be a good rock hunter out to 1,000 yards.
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 10-29-2013, 08:45 AM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Posts: 621
    Re: .270 bullet

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by royinidaho View Post
    I'm a 270 Win nut and have been shooting the cartridge for longer than a 45 year old person has lived. I'm also a knot head and opinionated. Most of what I say is pure fact. . . except for what isn't.

    Back in the day, long prior to the LRH bug, the 130 grain offerings were the goto bullet. About 400 yards was the limit for distance. I was using a Leuy 3-9 VX-II with duplex reticle.

    Along comes the LRH bug. Switched to a quality LRH scope. Found it necessary to go with 140 class bullets. bc of 140 were better than 130's and it showed in the shooting.

    Anything Nosler and Hornaday BTSPs shot lights out as do Berger 140s.

    A good scope with proper reticle for hold over and/or accurate clicks brings the Winnie well beyond a 600 yard deer getter.

    I suppose the 150 BT would do well but I as much as practicable I try not to shoot rainbows.

    The only "con" with the Hornady BTSP is deformation of the lead tip in the magazine. Doesn't seem to affect much other than cosmetics.

    I have an old 270win BDL that was my first hunting rifle I bought when I was 14. I am not gonna work on putting it in a good stock and putting a little better glass on it and am gonna be getting some good bullets for it also.

    What are your thoughts on those new 130 Classic Hunters from Berger? Looks like their BC is a little higher than even the 140gr. I was thinking pretty serious about them until you mentioned the 140's. Thanks for your help.
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 10-29-2013, 09:08 AM
    ntg ntg is offline
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: Blackfoot, ID
    Posts: 541
    Re: .270 bullet

    I've shot the 140SST out of mine with no complaints. Any 140 grainer moving along at close to 3000fps is nothing to sneeze at. However, after making an effective kill out at 450 yards on this years mule deer with my 7-08 moving the "boring" Hornady 139btsp at 2820fps I'm wondering if the extra charge (read $$$) for the plastic is all that necessary. Yes, the BC is a tad better, but if you get a good LR scope/reticle as Roy suggested the difference isn't an issue IMO.

    Regarding the Bergers, I hear good things, but they like them a lot IMO (read $$$).
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC