  | 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06 |
|

09-03-2012, 08:06 AM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SOCIALIST CONTROLLED TERRITORY OF NEW YORK
Posts: 4,061
|
|
|
Re: 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06
I'm voting lack of knowledge and good marketing
|

09-03-2012, 10:33 AM
|
|
Silver Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 235
|
|
|
Re: 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06
I shoot 6.5-06 because -
1. 264 Win Mag is belted - headspaces on the belt.
2. 6.5 x 284 case was originally designed for a lever action. For proper feeding a center feed must be used.
3. 6.5-06 magazine is perfected (30-06, 270, 25-06).
4. You can make good 6.5-06 brass by simply necking down Lapua 30-06 brass.
5. I get 264 Win Mag velocities from my 6.5-06.
My gunsmith talked me out of a 6.5 x 284 due to the magazine issue. I'm glad. I shoot 142 grain SMKs at 3050 fps. It's a tackdriver.
__________________
J
AR's for coyotes
25-06 M70 for coyotes
6.5-06 Remington Custom w/Leupold Mark IV 6.5-20 tactical setup
AR10 for mule deer
6.5-06 M700 for mule deer
338 Lapua Mag M700 for elk
|

09-03-2012, 02:50 PM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,191
|
|
|
Re: 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlamb
2. 6.5 x 284 case was originally designed for a lever action. For proper feeding a center feed must be used.
My gunsmith talked me out of a 6.5 x 284 due to the magazine issue. I'm glad. I shoot 142 grain SMKs at 3050 fps. It's a tackdriver.
|
That is one of the most interesting opinions I have ever heard regarding the 6.5x284.
Has anybody experienced any feeding problems. I personally have not. Maybe I am just lucky....??
__________________
Limits are only perceived by what has previously been achieved. Push the limits and good things will happen.
Go the distance or go home
Follow through matters. SEE THE FIRE!!!
August 2013 dall sheep: Stay Tuned
August 2013 Antelope: Stay Tuned
October2013 Bull elk: Stay Tuned
It's going a GREAT year!
|

09-03-2012, 03:29 PM
|
|
Gold Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Malta NY
Posts: 711
|
|
|
Re: 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06
I have seen that listed as a negative by Smiths on this site but those comments were from a few years ago. There may now be a best known method of correcting or mitigating the risk that has proliferated.
I myself went the -06 route and as such have no personal experience with feed issues in the 284 version.
__________________
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such governments. …” Jefferson
We are very close to this point now.
|

09-03-2012, 03:59 PM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,764
|
|
|
Re: 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Eichele
That is one of the most interesting opinions I have ever heard regarding the 6.5x284.
Has anybody experienced any feeding problems. I personally have not. Maybe I am just lucky....??
|
I have never heard of that one either. I never had an issue with my 6.5x284's feeding either staggered or straight stacked. I can't believe the case design had anything to do with feeding. Winchester designed the 284 because they wanted to promote 30-06 length case capacity for use in their short action lever and auto loading rifles. The rim design is identical to the 30-06 case with the case body a little fatter. If anything, the overall length of the 6.5x284 loaded with VLD's could be an advantage if a donor rifle action/magazine length is on the short side and you are seating VLD's close to or in the lands with a 6.5x06.
__________________

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready"-T. Roosevelt
|

09-03-2012, 04:11 PM
|
|
Gold Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Malta NY
Posts: 711
|
|
|
Re: 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06
Here are a couple old threads that discuss it in differing levels of detail.
6.5x284?
WTS Semi custom 6.5x284 Reduced AGAIN
And one of the sites more trusted sources discusses here:
6.5-06 vs. 6.5-284
__________________
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such governments. …” Jefferson
We are very close to this point now.
|

09-04-2012, 12:04 AM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,191
|
|
|
Re: 264 win mag vs 6.5-284/6.5-06
Looks like the one of the most trusted sources listed above is referring to the control round feed found in some Winchester actions. Now that makes sense. Still does not make any sense for a 700...
__________________
Limits are only perceived by what has previously been achieved. Push the limits and good things will happen.
Go the distance or go home
Follow through matters. SEE THE FIRE!!!
August 2013 dall sheep: Stay Tuned
August 2013 Antelope: Stay Tuned
October2013 Bull elk: Stay Tuned
It's going a GREAT year!
|
  |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.