Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


Reply

.264 win mag

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2008, 08:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 29
.264 win mag

Hey guys. I am looking for some people that have practical field info on the .264 win mag. I just recently purchased one and I'm curious of the success (or failures) that others have had with it. And before everyone tells me I could do better with a 7mm win mag or a .270 wsm...I got both and have had good success with both...I just wanted to add the .264 to the collection. Thanks everyone!!
__________________
Brett Norton
SSG, USA
yoter13@yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2008, 09:21 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 50
I've been shooting a 264 for around 9 years now and shot a number of deer and pronghorn. I started using 100 gr. ballistic tip's but quickly went to 120's... I was pushing them fast and obviously they weren't the best for close range shots. I switched to Barnes 120 XLC's and had very good results from close range to 535 yards. With a max charge of R-22 I got amazing velocities with the XLC. The triple shocks came out and I tried them as well. The accuracy was good but I could not get near the velocity as I was getting with the XLC's without too much pressure so I stuck with the "blue bullets".. though now I believe the 120's are not available.

I'm working on better long range bullets now and the 140 SST's are looking promising but for deer I am going to start loading AMax's. I tried Retumbo last fall but couldn't get over 3050 fps in a 28" barrel. I think I'll go back to R22.

That's my experience. If you search past posts you'll find quite a few threads on this great caliber.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2008, 11:09 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 36
help

I also have a question about this calliber. How is the kick, and would you consiter hunting elk with it.
My reason for asking this question is that i am trying to get a rifle together for a buddy of mine who is real new to the game. He wants something without a break that is very bearable to shoot a lot and that he can still use for elk. Having no expeirience whatsoever with this caliber I would like to know more about it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2008, 11:30 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 29
i'm kinda in the same boat. i havent even shot mine yet. ballistically its alot like the .270 wsm. the .270 wsm beats it by a couple hundred FPS and FBE in some cases. i have seen what the wsm will do to whitetails at 300+, so i am excited to see what the .264 will do. from everyting ive read you could down an elk with it...though im not sure id go with it if that was the only application i was gonna use it for. even though i really didnt need the caliber...im using my upcoming move to OK as justification. cant really hunt the western plains without a westerns plains caliber...right?
__________________
Brett Norton
SSG, USA
yoter13@yahoo.com

Last edited by bnorton325; 02-24-2008 at 11:33 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2008, 11:58 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PUEBLO, CO, USA
Posts: 1,093
I carried a Savage 110DL 264 win mag from 1965 to 1985 in PA. I killed mostly whitetails with it, some at longer ranges. All were one shot kills with lots of meat damage. I also reloaded for it for about 15 yrs. I guess I wore the barrel out I shot it so much in summer. The thing that killed the 264 was the 2 step bullet( yeah back then 264 bullets were dual diameter) and the intro of the 7 mm rem mag. It's still the original long range western big game rifle.

Good luck with yours.
__________________
svenska50@hotmail.com

NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:21 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 29
im excited about it. it is a gorgeous rifle...a rem 700 CDL...with a fluted barrel. havent seen many like it and it looks great. it goes well with the .270 wsm that i have in a 700 lss. i might not can kill deer at 1000 yds...but you wouldnt know it by looking at these rifles!! id post pics if i was smart enough to do so
__________________
Brett Norton
SSG, USA
yoter13@yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2008, 03:46 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: western ND
Posts: 30
bn,

Welcome to the .264 shooters club! Most of us are, perhaps, getting a little long in the tooth, but new members are welcome!

Like you, I also recently acquired a new CDL .264, mine is the SF version. From what I've heard, there were only 75 of each made, the blued fluted and the stainless fluted. I haven't shot mine yet either, and I don't know when I'll get to it. It's not a pressing issue with me, I still shoot an old 700 Classic .264 from 1986, which is an extremely accurate rifle.

Also, like you, I shoot a 7mmRM, and in my case, a 7mmWSM. Both of which I like just fine, but that doesn't mean I can't shoot a .264WM as well! I don't think you will notice any difference in terminal performance among these cartridges, they are all in the same general category. The bullet used will determine terminal performance.

Like another poster said, the .264WM is the original long range western big game cartridge. As I type this, I am looking at an original print ad for the old pre-64 Model 70 Westerner. "It makes a helluva noise and packs a helluva wallop", the ad says. "It's most at home in one-shot-or-nothing country. You know the kind of terrain - it's out there where the plains seem endless and where the high sheep grazing seem to flow in and out the clouds. That's where your .264 earns its keep." Kinda romantic, don't you think! At any rate, the old .264WM is a genuine classic, at least among open country hunters. I will always have my .264's.

If you would be a .264WM shooter, then you should be a handloader as well. Factory loadings are limited, basically you have a choice between the Winchester or Remington 140gr. (Didn't I hear Nosler has a new .264 load?). The Winchester load is faster, the Remington load is extremely accurate in my .264WM Classic. Brass is generally available in a steady by jerks fashion. In other words, every so often Winchester puts out a batch, and when it is available, you should buy it, whether or not you think you need it at the time. 7mmRM brass works just as well, but since, like you, I also shoot the 7mmRM, I prefer brass with the correct head stamp.

A recent article on loading the for the .264WM, is John Barsness' "New Powders in the .264 Winchester Magnum", which appeared in the February 2005 issue of Handloader magazine. This article was written because .264 shooters could find very little information on loads using the newer slow powders in the reloading manuals, most of which just have loads for older powders, and haven't been updated in many years. You may still be able to get a back issue from Wolfe Publishing.

Good luck and happy hunting!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
I currently have hunting preference points in the following states

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC