Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Long Range Hunting & Shooting

Long Range Hunting & Shooting Nightforce Optics


225 Accubond vs Elk Report

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2009, 05:59 PM
Gold Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Western MI
Posts: 716
Re: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report

Here are some recovered 225 gr AB's shot from my 338 RUM and recovered from water jugs,

Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 11:43 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SW Montana
Posts: 4,381
Re: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report

It seems that there is allot of shooting at way to close of range with way to much cal for the job. If you shoot a 338 size bullet in the lower grain offerings and you push them fast enough at close range nearly any bullet will turn into a gernade with all that frontal area with no backside to back it up. I would think that maybe loading down to a lower velocity and using them for close shots may not be a bad idea or having some Barnes loaded up for close work. Shooting a 180 gr bullet in a real large magnum chambering at deer in close quarters is kinda like shooting a coyote with v-max's out of a 22-250.
In the quest of long range we typically build on larger cals and push bullets beyond there design capabilities in the short range to gain ballistics and killing power for the long range kill, during the first few hundred yards many of us are way out of the bullets design capabilities but by the time the bullet connects with our long range target it is within it's design capability and functions as we would expect. I think we have to keep in mind that we are building long range rigs, we don't expect a short range rifle and load to function at long distance why should we expect a long range one to function at close range.
Not trying to ruffle any feathers, just my take on it.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 12:15 AM
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 783
Re: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report

A few years ago I shot a big bull that was trotting straight away at around 200 yards with a 7mm rem mag with the 160 gr xlc and it went all the way through hitting the vitals exiting and killing him in one shot. I thought that was impressive as far as penetration but on second hand I worry about those barnes bullets just punching a hole and not expanding enough. I think they are probably great on Elk and larger game but for deer and other smaller game something that expands might be a little better in my opinion. Im using 180 gr accubonds this year for elk in my 300 ultra so I guess ill see how they work. Hope this is helpful...
Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 09:18 AM
Gold Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Western MI
Posts: 716
Re: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report

Have you considered the 338 250 gr AB with a BC of .575?


Last edited by JD338; 10-25-2009 at 12:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 09:49 AM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SW MO
Posts: 1,136
Re: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report

My one experience with this bullet is a muzzle velocity of 3050 fps and a shot of 320 yds on a bull elk. The first shot was slightly quartering away and went through onside ribs and centered the humerus on the offside, shattering the bone. There was no exit and only bullet fragments were found around the shattered humerus but that is a direct impact on a large bone. Followup shot was quartering towards and went down through neck towards chest. No exit and I did not locate bullet. In both cases, lots of bone was hit and I wouldn't have expected any bullet other than a TSX or such to remain intact. Just my two cents.
Lefties are the only ones in their right minds!
(and I ain't talkin' politics!)

NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 01:24 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,344
Re: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report


Nice picture display. That's about what my 7mm ABs look like, when they've been recovered in game. About 60-65% weight retention.

Not sure what's up with the 225 338s. Hoping LTLR provides an update and some photos of the bullets he's recovering. I've read of some hunters disappointments with the 225 338 AB on the Campfire site in the past also - based on some game taken in Africa. My tendency was to dismiss it as a fluke, but here's the same kind of incident again. If there's less than 35% weight retention, then their performance is clearly less than Nosler planned/designed for.

Maybe we will see some pics and retained weight data.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2013, 08:58 AM
rwk rwk is offline
Silver Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 107
Re: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report

I do'nt understand all you folks got your animals so whats the problem, dead is dead. So i guess the bullet worked. DUH
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: 225 Accubond vs Elk Report
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
whats the difference between Winchester Accubond and Nosler Accubond? matt_3479 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 06-29-2011 03:30 PM
Range Report 16 FSS .270 WSM remingtonman_25_06 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 10-12-2010 11:04 AM
7mm 150 gr E-Tip Report JD338 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 17 07-13-2008 07:24 PM
7mm 160 grain Accubond Field Report dakor Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 7 02-22-2005 08:50 AM

Current Poll
How Many Different Cartridges Do You Reload For?
ZERO, all factory ammo - 7.99%
349 Votes
1 - 2.79%
122 Votes
2 or 3 - 14.57%
636 Votes
4 or 5 - 20.32%
887 Votes
6 or 7 - 14.86%
649 Votes
8 or 9 - 8.66%
378 Votes
10 or more - 30.81%
1,345 Vote
Total Votes: 4,366
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC